Cargando…
Number Needed to Diagnose, Predict, or Misdiagnose: Useful Metrics for Non-Canonical Signs of Cognitive Status?
BACKGROUND/AIMS: “Number needed to” metrics may hold more intuitive appeal for clinicians than standard diagnostic accuracy measures. The aim of this study was to calculate “number needed to diagnose” (NND), “number needed to predict” (NNP), and “number needed to misdiagnose” (NNM) for neurological...
Autor principal: | Larner, A.J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000492783 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Canonical metrics in Kähler geometry
por: Tian, Gang
Publicado: (2000) -
Cognitive screening instruments for dementia: comparing metrics of test limitation
por: Larner, Andrew J.
Publicado: (2021) -
A perspective on canonical Riemannian metrics
por: Catino, Giovanni, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Benefit–Risk Assessment of Galcanezumab Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Episodic and Chronic Migraine Using the Metrics of Number Needed to Treat and Number Needed to Harm
por: Citrome, Leslie, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Missed diagnoses and misdiagnoses of adults with autism spectrum disorder
por: Fusar-Poli, Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2020)