Cargando…
Perspective on Improving Environmental Monitoring of Biothreats
For more than a decade, the United States has performed environmental monitoring by collecting and analyzing air samples for a handful of biological threat agents (BTAs) in order to detect a possible biological attack. This effort has faced numerous technical challenges including timeliness, samplin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00147 |
_version_ | 1783366545760583680 |
---|---|
author | Dunbar, John Pillai, Segaran Wunschel, David Dickens, Michael Morse, Stephen A. Franz, David Bartko, Andrew Challacombe, Jean Persons, Timothy Hughes, Molly A. Blanke, Steve R. Holland, Robin Hutchison, Janine Merkley, Eric D. Campbell, Katrina Branda, Catherine S. Sharma, Shashi Lindler, Luther Anderson, Kevin Hodge, David |
author_facet | Dunbar, John Pillai, Segaran Wunschel, David Dickens, Michael Morse, Stephen A. Franz, David Bartko, Andrew Challacombe, Jean Persons, Timothy Hughes, Molly A. Blanke, Steve R. Holland, Robin Hutchison, Janine Merkley, Eric D. Campbell, Katrina Branda, Catherine S. Sharma, Shashi Lindler, Luther Anderson, Kevin Hodge, David |
author_sort | Dunbar, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | For more than a decade, the United States has performed environmental monitoring by collecting and analyzing air samples for a handful of biological threat agents (BTAs) in order to detect a possible biological attack. This effort has faced numerous technical challenges including timeliness, sampling efficiency, sensitivity, specificity, and robustness. The cost of city-wide environmental monitoring using conventional technology has also been a challenge. A large group of scientists with expertise in bioterrorism defense met to assess the objectives and current efficacy of environmental monitoring and to identify operational and technological changes that could enhance its efficacy and cost-effectiveness, thus enhancing its value. The highest priority operational change that was identified was to abandon the current concept of city-wide environmental monitoring because the operational costs were too high and its value was compromised by low detection sensitivity and other environmental factors. Instead, it was suggested that the focus should primarily be on indoor monitoring and secondarily on special-event monitoring because objectives are tractable and these operational settings are aligned with likelihood and risk assessments. The highest priority technological change identified was the development of a reagent-less, real-time sensor that can identify a potential airborne release and trigger secondary tests of greater sensitivity and specificity for occasional samples of interest. This technological change could be transformative with the potential to greatly reduce operational costs and thereby create the opportunity to expand the scope and effectiveness of environmental monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6207620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62076202018-11-07 Perspective on Improving Environmental Monitoring of Biothreats Dunbar, John Pillai, Segaran Wunschel, David Dickens, Michael Morse, Stephen A. Franz, David Bartko, Andrew Challacombe, Jean Persons, Timothy Hughes, Molly A. Blanke, Steve R. Holland, Robin Hutchison, Janine Merkley, Eric D. Campbell, Katrina Branda, Catherine S. Sharma, Shashi Lindler, Luther Anderson, Kevin Hodge, David Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology For more than a decade, the United States has performed environmental monitoring by collecting and analyzing air samples for a handful of biological threat agents (BTAs) in order to detect a possible biological attack. This effort has faced numerous technical challenges including timeliness, sampling efficiency, sensitivity, specificity, and robustness. The cost of city-wide environmental monitoring using conventional technology has also been a challenge. A large group of scientists with expertise in bioterrorism defense met to assess the objectives and current efficacy of environmental monitoring and to identify operational and technological changes that could enhance its efficacy and cost-effectiveness, thus enhancing its value. The highest priority operational change that was identified was to abandon the current concept of city-wide environmental monitoring because the operational costs were too high and its value was compromised by low detection sensitivity and other environmental factors. Instead, it was suggested that the focus should primarily be on indoor monitoring and secondarily on special-event monitoring because objectives are tractable and these operational settings are aligned with likelihood and risk assessments. The highest priority technological change identified was the development of a reagent-less, real-time sensor that can identify a potential airborne release and trigger secondary tests of greater sensitivity and specificity for occasional samples of interest. This technological change could be transformative with the potential to greatly reduce operational costs and thereby create the opportunity to expand the scope and effectiveness of environmental monitoring. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6207620/ /pubmed/30406093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00147 Text en Copyright © 2018 Dunbar, Pillai, Wunschel, Dickens, Morse, Franz, Bartko, Challacombe, Persons, Hughes, Blanke, Holland, Hutchison, Merkley, Campbell, Branda, Sharma, Lindler, Anderson and Hodge. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Dunbar, John Pillai, Segaran Wunschel, David Dickens, Michael Morse, Stephen A. Franz, David Bartko, Andrew Challacombe, Jean Persons, Timothy Hughes, Molly A. Blanke, Steve R. Holland, Robin Hutchison, Janine Merkley, Eric D. Campbell, Katrina Branda, Catherine S. Sharma, Shashi Lindler, Luther Anderson, Kevin Hodge, David Perspective on Improving Environmental Monitoring of Biothreats |
title | Perspective on Improving Environmental Monitoring of Biothreats |
title_full | Perspective on Improving Environmental Monitoring of Biothreats |
title_fullStr | Perspective on Improving Environmental Monitoring of Biothreats |
title_full_unstemmed | Perspective on Improving Environmental Monitoring of Biothreats |
title_short | Perspective on Improving Environmental Monitoring of Biothreats |
title_sort | perspective on improving environmental monitoring of biothreats |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dunbarjohn perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT pillaisegaran perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT wunscheldavid perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT dickensmichael perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT morsestephena perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT franzdavid perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT bartkoandrew perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT challacombejean perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT personstimothy perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT hughesmollya perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT blankestever perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT hollandrobin perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT hutchisonjanine perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT merkleyericd perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT campbellkatrina perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT brandacatherines perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT sharmashashi perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT lindlerluther perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT andersonkevin perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats AT hodgedavid perspectiveonimprovingenvironmentalmonitoringofbiothreats |