Cargando…

Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS)

Objective: This study aimed to determine the extent to which robotic arm rehabilitation for chronic stroke may promote recovery of speech and language function in individuals with aphasia. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 17 individuals from a hemiparesis rehabilitation study pairing intensive rob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buchwald, Adam, Falconer, Carolyn, Rykman-Peltz, Avrielle, Cortes, Mar, Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, Thickbroom, Gary W., Krebs, Hermano Igo, Fregni, Felipe, Gerber, Linda M., Oromendia, Clara, Chang, Johanna, Volpe, Bruce T., Edwards, Dylan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00853
_version_ 1783366627725672448
author Buchwald, Adam
Falconer, Carolyn
Rykman-Peltz, Avrielle
Cortes, Mar
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
Thickbroom, Gary W.
Krebs, Hermano Igo
Fregni, Felipe
Gerber, Linda M.
Oromendia, Clara
Chang, Johanna
Volpe, Bruce T.
Edwards, Dylan J.
author_facet Buchwald, Adam
Falconer, Carolyn
Rykman-Peltz, Avrielle
Cortes, Mar
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
Thickbroom, Gary W.
Krebs, Hermano Igo
Fregni, Felipe
Gerber, Linda M.
Oromendia, Clara
Chang, Johanna
Volpe, Bruce T.
Edwards, Dylan J.
author_sort Buchwald, Adam
collection PubMed
description Objective: This study aimed to determine the extent to which robotic arm rehabilitation for chronic stroke may promote recovery of speech and language function in individuals with aphasia. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 17 individuals from a hemiparesis rehabilitation study pairing intensive robot assisted therapy with sham or active tDCS and evaluated their speech (N = 17) and language (N = 9) performance before and after a 12-week (36 session) treatment regimen. Performance changes were evaluated with paired t-tests comparing pre- and post-test measures. There was no speech therapy included in the treatment protocol. Results: Overall, the individuals significantly improved on measures of motor speech production from pre-test to post-test. Of the subset who performed language testing (N = 9), overall aphasia severity on a standardized aphasia battery improved from pre-test baseline to post-test. Active tDCS was not associated with greater gains than sham tDCS. Conclusions: This work indicates the importance of considering approaches to stroke rehabilitation across different domains of impairment, and warrants additional exploration of the possibility that robotic arm motor treatment may enhance rehabilitation for speech and language outcomes. Further investigation into the role of tDCS in the relationship of limb and speech/language rehabilitation is required, as active tDCS did not increase improvements over sham tDCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6207995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62079952018-11-07 Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS) Buchwald, Adam Falconer, Carolyn Rykman-Peltz, Avrielle Cortes, Mar Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Thickbroom, Gary W. Krebs, Hermano Igo Fregni, Felipe Gerber, Linda M. Oromendia, Clara Chang, Johanna Volpe, Bruce T. Edwards, Dylan J. Front Neurol Neurology Objective: This study aimed to determine the extent to which robotic arm rehabilitation for chronic stroke may promote recovery of speech and language function in individuals with aphasia. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 17 individuals from a hemiparesis rehabilitation study pairing intensive robot assisted therapy with sham or active tDCS and evaluated their speech (N = 17) and language (N = 9) performance before and after a 12-week (36 session) treatment regimen. Performance changes were evaluated with paired t-tests comparing pre- and post-test measures. There was no speech therapy included in the treatment protocol. Results: Overall, the individuals significantly improved on measures of motor speech production from pre-test to post-test. Of the subset who performed language testing (N = 9), overall aphasia severity on a standardized aphasia battery improved from pre-test baseline to post-test. Active tDCS was not associated with greater gains than sham tDCS. Conclusions: This work indicates the importance of considering approaches to stroke rehabilitation across different domains of impairment, and warrants additional exploration of the possibility that robotic arm motor treatment may enhance rehabilitation for speech and language outcomes. Further investigation into the role of tDCS in the relationship of limb and speech/language rehabilitation is required, as active tDCS did not increase improvements over sham tDCS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6207995/ /pubmed/30405512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00853 Text en Copyright © 2018 Buchwald, Falconer, Rykman-Peltz, Cortes, Pascual-Leone, Thickbroom, Krebs, Fregni, Gerber, Oromendia, Chang, Volpe and Edwards. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Buchwald, Adam
Falconer, Carolyn
Rykman-Peltz, Avrielle
Cortes, Mar
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
Thickbroom, Gary W.
Krebs, Hermano Igo
Fregni, Felipe
Gerber, Linda M.
Oromendia, Clara
Chang, Johanna
Volpe, Bruce T.
Edwards, Dylan J.
Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS)
title Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS)
title_full Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS)
title_fullStr Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS)
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS)
title_short Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS)
title_sort robotic arm rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients with aphasia may promote speech and language recovery (but effect is not enhanced by supplementary tdcs)
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00853
work_keys_str_mv AT buchwaldadam roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT falconercarolyn roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT rykmanpeltzavrielle roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT cortesmar roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT pascualleonealvaro roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT thickbroomgaryw roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT krebshermanoigo roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT fregnifelipe roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT gerberlindam roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT oromendiaclara roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT changjohanna roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT volpebrucet roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs
AT edwardsdylanj roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs