Cargando…
Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS)
Objective: This study aimed to determine the extent to which robotic arm rehabilitation for chronic stroke may promote recovery of speech and language function in individuals with aphasia. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 17 individuals from a hemiparesis rehabilitation study pairing intensive rob...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00853 |
_version_ | 1783366627725672448 |
---|---|
author | Buchwald, Adam Falconer, Carolyn Rykman-Peltz, Avrielle Cortes, Mar Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Thickbroom, Gary W. Krebs, Hermano Igo Fregni, Felipe Gerber, Linda M. Oromendia, Clara Chang, Johanna Volpe, Bruce T. Edwards, Dylan J. |
author_facet | Buchwald, Adam Falconer, Carolyn Rykman-Peltz, Avrielle Cortes, Mar Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Thickbroom, Gary W. Krebs, Hermano Igo Fregni, Felipe Gerber, Linda M. Oromendia, Clara Chang, Johanna Volpe, Bruce T. Edwards, Dylan J. |
author_sort | Buchwald, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This study aimed to determine the extent to which robotic arm rehabilitation for chronic stroke may promote recovery of speech and language function in individuals with aphasia. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 17 individuals from a hemiparesis rehabilitation study pairing intensive robot assisted therapy with sham or active tDCS and evaluated their speech (N = 17) and language (N = 9) performance before and after a 12-week (36 session) treatment regimen. Performance changes were evaluated with paired t-tests comparing pre- and post-test measures. There was no speech therapy included in the treatment protocol. Results: Overall, the individuals significantly improved on measures of motor speech production from pre-test to post-test. Of the subset who performed language testing (N = 9), overall aphasia severity on a standardized aphasia battery improved from pre-test baseline to post-test. Active tDCS was not associated with greater gains than sham tDCS. Conclusions: This work indicates the importance of considering approaches to stroke rehabilitation across different domains of impairment, and warrants additional exploration of the possibility that robotic arm motor treatment may enhance rehabilitation for speech and language outcomes. Further investigation into the role of tDCS in the relationship of limb and speech/language rehabilitation is required, as active tDCS did not increase improvements over sham tDCS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6207995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62079952018-11-07 Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS) Buchwald, Adam Falconer, Carolyn Rykman-Peltz, Avrielle Cortes, Mar Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Thickbroom, Gary W. Krebs, Hermano Igo Fregni, Felipe Gerber, Linda M. Oromendia, Clara Chang, Johanna Volpe, Bruce T. Edwards, Dylan J. Front Neurol Neurology Objective: This study aimed to determine the extent to which robotic arm rehabilitation for chronic stroke may promote recovery of speech and language function in individuals with aphasia. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 17 individuals from a hemiparesis rehabilitation study pairing intensive robot assisted therapy with sham or active tDCS and evaluated their speech (N = 17) and language (N = 9) performance before and after a 12-week (36 session) treatment regimen. Performance changes were evaluated with paired t-tests comparing pre- and post-test measures. There was no speech therapy included in the treatment protocol. Results: Overall, the individuals significantly improved on measures of motor speech production from pre-test to post-test. Of the subset who performed language testing (N = 9), overall aphasia severity on a standardized aphasia battery improved from pre-test baseline to post-test. Active tDCS was not associated with greater gains than sham tDCS. Conclusions: This work indicates the importance of considering approaches to stroke rehabilitation across different domains of impairment, and warrants additional exploration of the possibility that robotic arm motor treatment may enhance rehabilitation for speech and language outcomes. Further investigation into the role of tDCS in the relationship of limb and speech/language rehabilitation is required, as active tDCS did not increase improvements over sham tDCS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6207995/ /pubmed/30405512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00853 Text en Copyright © 2018 Buchwald, Falconer, Rykman-Peltz, Cortes, Pascual-Leone, Thickbroom, Krebs, Fregni, Gerber, Oromendia, Chang, Volpe and Edwards. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Buchwald, Adam Falconer, Carolyn Rykman-Peltz, Avrielle Cortes, Mar Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Thickbroom, Gary W. Krebs, Hermano Igo Fregni, Felipe Gerber, Linda M. Oromendia, Clara Chang, Johanna Volpe, Bruce T. Edwards, Dylan J. Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS) |
title | Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS) |
title_full | Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS) |
title_fullStr | Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS) |
title_short | Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia May Promote Speech and Language Recovery (but Effect Is Not Enhanced by Supplementary tDCS) |
title_sort | robotic arm rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients with aphasia may promote speech and language recovery (but effect is not enhanced by supplementary tdcs) |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00853 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buchwaldadam roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT falconercarolyn roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT rykmanpeltzavrielle roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT cortesmar roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT pascualleonealvaro roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT thickbroomgaryw roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT krebshermanoigo roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT fregnifelipe roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT gerberlindam roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT oromendiaclara roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT changjohanna roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT volpebrucet roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs AT edwardsdylanj roboticarmrehabilitationinchronicstrokepatientswithaphasiamaypromotespeechandlanguagerecoverybuteffectisnotenhancedbysupplementarytdcs |