Cargando…

A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE

Several imaging modalities, including T1-weighted structural imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI can show chronological age related changes. Employing machine learning algorithms, an individual's imaging data can predict their age with reasonable accuracy. While details vary a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le, Trang T., Kuplicki, Rayus T., McKinney, Brett A., Yeh, Hung-Wen, Thompson, Wesley K., Paulus, Martin P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00317
_version_ 1783366629180047360
author Le, Trang T.
Kuplicki, Rayus T.
McKinney, Brett A.
Yeh, Hung-Wen
Thompson, Wesley K.
Paulus, Martin P.
author_facet Le, Trang T.
Kuplicki, Rayus T.
McKinney, Brett A.
Yeh, Hung-Wen
Thompson, Wesley K.
Paulus, Martin P.
author_sort Le, Trang T.
collection PubMed
description Several imaging modalities, including T1-weighted structural imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI can show chronological age related changes. Employing machine learning algorithms, an individual's imaging data can predict their age with reasonable accuracy. While details vary according to modality, the general strategy is to: (1) extract image-related features, (2) build a model on a training set that uses those features to predict an individual's age, (3) validate the model on a test dataset, producing a predicted age for each individual, (4) define the “Brain Age Gap Estimate” (BrainAGE) as the difference between an individual's predicted age and his/her chronological age, (5) estimate the relationship between BrainAGE and other variables of interest, and (6) make inferences about those variables and accelerated or delayed brain aging. For example, a group of individuals with overall positive BrainAGE may show signs of accelerated aging in other variables as well. There is inevitably an overestimation of the age of younger individuals and an underestimation of the age of older individuals due to “regression to the mean.” The correlation between chronological age and BrainAGE may significantly impact the relationship between BrainAGE and other variables of interest when they are also related to age. In this study, we examine the detectability of variable effects under different assumptions. We use empirical results from two separate datasets [training = 475 healthy volunteers, aged 18–60 years (259 female); testing = 489 participants including people with mood/anxiety, substance use, eating disorders and healthy controls, aged 18–56 years (312 female)] to inform simulation parameter selection. Outcomes in simulated and empirical data strongly support the proposal that models incorporating BrainAGE should include chronological age as a covariate. We propose either including age as a covariate in step 5 of the above framework, or employing a multistep procedure where age is regressed on BrainAGE prior to step 5, producing BrainAGE Residualized (BrainAGER) scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6208001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62080012018-11-07 A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE Le, Trang T. Kuplicki, Rayus T. McKinney, Brett A. Yeh, Hung-Wen Thompson, Wesley K. Paulus, Martin P. Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Several imaging modalities, including T1-weighted structural imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI can show chronological age related changes. Employing machine learning algorithms, an individual's imaging data can predict their age with reasonable accuracy. While details vary according to modality, the general strategy is to: (1) extract image-related features, (2) build a model on a training set that uses those features to predict an individual's age, (3) validate the model on a test dataset, producing a predicted age for each individual, (4) define the “Brain Age Gap Estimate” (BrainAGE) as the difference between an individual's predicted age and his/her chronological age, (5) estimate the relationship between BrainAGE and other variables of interest, and (6) make inferences about those variables and accelerated or delayed brain aging. For example, a group of individuals with overall positive BrainAGE may show signs of accelerated aging in other variables as well. There is inevitably an overestimation of the age of younger individuals and an underestimation of the age of older individuals due to “regression to the mean.” The correlation between chronological age and BrainAGE may significantly impact the relationship between BrainAGE and other variables of interest when they are also related to age. In this study, we examine the detectability of variable effects under different assumptions. We use empirical results from two separate datasets [training = 475 healthy volunteers, aged 18–60 years (259 female); testing = 489 participants including people with mood/anxiety, substance use, eating disorders and healthy controls, aged 18–56 years (312 female)] to inform simulation parameter selection. Outcomes in simulated and empirical data strongly support the proposal that models incorporating BrainAGE should include chronological age as a covariate. We propose either including age as a covariate in step 5 of the above framework, or employing a multistep procedure where age is regressed on BrainAGE prior to step 5, producing BrainAGE Residualized (BrainAGER) scores. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6208001/ /pubmed/30405393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00317 Text en Copyright © 2018 Le, Kuplicki, McKinney, Yeh, Thompson, and Paulus. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Le, Trang T.
Kuplicki, Rayus T.
McKinney, Brett A.
Yeh, Hung-Wen
Thompson, Wesley K.
Paulus, Martin P.
A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE
title A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE
title_full A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE
title_fullStr A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE
title_full_unstemmed A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE
title_short A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE
title_sort nonlinear simulation framework supports adjusting for age when analyzing brainage
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00317
work_keys_str_mv AT letrangt anonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT kuplickirayust anonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT mckinneybretta anonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT yehhungwen anonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT thompsonwesleyk anonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT paulusmartinp anonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT anonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT letrangt nonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT kuplickirayust nonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT mckinneybretta nonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT yehhungwen nonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT thompsonwesleyk nonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT paulusmartinp nonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage
AT nonlinearsimulationframeworksupportsadjustingforagewhenanalyzingbrainage