Cargando…

Universal ocular screening of 481 infants using wide-field digital imaging system

BACKGROUND: Universal ocular screening of infants is not a standard procedure in children’s health care system in China. This pilot study investigated prevalence of ocular abnormalities of 6 weeks-age infants using wide-field digital imaging system. METHODS: Infants aged 6 weeks around were consecut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yan, Deng, Guangda, Ma, Jing, Liu, Jinghua, Li, Songfeng, Lu, Hai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0943-7
_version_ 1783366649227771904
author Ma, Yan
Deng, Guangda
Ma, Jing
Liu, Jinghua
Li, Songfeng
Lu, Hai
author_facet Ma, Yan
Deng, Guangda
Ma, Jing
Liu, Jinghua
Li, Songfeng
Lu, Hai
author_sort Ma, Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Universal ocular screening of infants is not a standard procedure in children’s health care system in China. This pilot study investigated prevalence of ocular abnormalities of 6 weeks-age infants using wide-field digital imaging system. METHODS: Infants aged 6 weeks around were consecutively enrolled in a public hospital between April 2015 and August 2016. All the infants who were enrolled in the study underwent vision assessment, eye position examination, external eye check, pupillary light reflex, red reflex examination, anterior and posterior ocular segments were examined using flashlight, ophthalmoscope, and wide-field digital imaging system. RESULTS: A total of 481 infants at 45.1 ± 6.1 days after birth were enrolled in the study. 198 infants had abnormal findings (41.2%). Retinal white spots and retinal white areas were the most common findings (42.9% of abnormalities and 17.7% of all infants screened). The second major finding was retinal hemorrhage (16.2% of abnormalities and 6.7% of all infants screened). Other abnormal findings include retinal pigmentation, concomitant exotropia, neonatal dacryocystitis, retinopathy of prematurity, ‘albinism-like fundus’, congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction, familial exudative vitreoretinopathy, immature retina, corneal dermoid tumor, large physiologic cupping of optic disc, congenital persistent pupillary membrane, entropion trichiasis, subconjunctival hemorrhage, congenital cataract, vitreous hemorrhage, ptosis and choroidal nevus. Intervention of any form was required in 22 infants, which accounted for 11.1% of abnormalities detected and 4.6% of all infants screened. CONCLUSION: Universal ocular screening is not only necessary for preterm infants but also for full-term infants. Addition of red reflex examination with wide-field digital imaging system can enhance the sensitivity of screening for ocular fundus abnormities. Further study with a long-term follow-up is needed in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6208088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62080882018-11-16 Universal ocular screening of 481 infants using wide-field digital imaging system Ma, Yan Deng, Guangda Ma, Jing Liu, Jinghua Li, Songfeng Lu, Hai BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Universal ocular screening of infants is not a standard procedure in children’s health care system in China. This pilot study investigated prevalence of ocular abnormalities of 6 weeks-age infants using wide-field digital imaging system. METHODS: Infants aged 6 weeks around were consecutively enrolled in a public hospital between April 2015 and August 2016. All the infants who were enrolled in the study underwent vision assessment, eye position examination, external eye check, pupillary light reflex, red reflex examination, anterior and posterior ocular segments were examined using flashlight, ophthalmoscope, and wide-field digital imaging system. RESULTS: A total of 481 infants at 45.1 ± 6.1 days after birth were enrolled in the study. 198 infants had abnormal findings (41.2%). Retinal white spots and retinal white areas were the most common findings (42.9% of abnormalities and 17.7% of all infants screened). The second major finding was retinal hemorrhage (16.2% of abnormalities and 6.7% of all infants screened). Other abnormal findings include retinal pigmentation, concomitant exotropia, neonatal dacryocystitis, retinopathy of prematurity, ‘albinism-like fundus’, congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction, familial exudative vitreoretinopathy, immature retina, corneal dermoid tumor, large physiologic cupping of optic disc, congenital persistent pupillary membrane, entropion trichiasis, subconjunctival hemorrhage, congenital cataract, vitreous hemorrhage, ptosis and choroidal nevus. Intervention of any form was required in 22 infants, which accounted for 11.1% of abnormalities detected and 4.6% of all infants screened. CONCLUSION: Universal ocular screening is not only necessary for preterm infants but also for full-term infants. Addition of red reflex examination with wide-field digital imaging system can enhance the sensitivity of screening for ocular fundus abnormities. Further study with a long-term follow-up is needed in the future. BioMed Central 2018-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6208088/ /pubmed/30376816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0943-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ma, Yan
Deng, Guangda
Ma, Jing
Liu, Jinghua
Li, Songfeng
Lu, Hai
Universal ocular screening of 481 infants using wide-field digital imaging system
title Universal ocular screening of 481 infants using wide-field digital imaging system
title_full Universal ocular screening of 481 infants using wide-field digital imaging system
title_fullStr Universal ocular screening of 481 infants using wide-field digital imaging system
title_full_unstemmed Universal ocular screening of 481 infants using wide-field digital imaging system
title_short Universal ocular screening of 481 infants using wide-field digital imaging system
title_sort universal ocular screening of 481 infants using wide-field digital imaging system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0943-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mayan universalocularscreeningof481infantsusingwidefielddigitalimagingsystem
AT dengguangda universalocularscreeningof481infantsusingwidefielddigitalimagingsystem
AT majing universalocularscreeningof481infantsusingwidefielddigitalimagingsystem
AT liujinghua universalocularscreeningof481infantsusingwidefielddigitalimagingsystem
AT lisongfeng universalocularscreeningof481infantsusingwidefielddigitalimagingsystem
AT luhai universalocularscreeningof481infantsusingwidefielddigitalimagingsystem