Cargando…

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Continuous epidural infusion (CEI) is the standard application setting for epidural infusion. A new mode, the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) technique, showed reduced local anesthetic (LA) consumption and improved analgesia in obstetric analgesia. Goal of this trial was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiesmann, Thomas, Hoff, Lilli, Prien, Lara, Torossian, Alexander, Eberhart, Leopold, Wulf, Hinnerk, Feldmann, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0613-6
_version_ 1783366653115891712
author Wiesmann, Thomas
Hoff, Lilli
Prien, Lara
Torossian, Alexander
Eberhart, Leopold
Wulf, Hinnerk
Feldmann, Carsten
author_facet Wiesmann, Thomas
Hoff, Lilli
Prien, Lara
Torossian, Alexander
Eberhart, Leopold
Wulf, Hinnerk
Feldmann, Carsten
author_sort Wiesmann, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Continuous epidural infusion (CEI) is the standard application setting for epidural infusion. A new mode, the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) technique, showed reduced local anesthetic (LA) consumption and improved analgesia in obstetric analgesia. Goal of this trial was to evaluate the effects of PIEB versus CEI [combined with patient-controlled bolus (PCEA)] on LA consumption and pain scorings in major abdominal cancer surgery. METHODS: Following ethical approval, patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery under general anesthesia in combination with epidural analgesia were randomized to receive either a PIEB mode of 6 mL/h or a CEI mode set at 6 mL/h of ropivacaine 0.2%, both combined with a PCEA mode set at a 4 mL bolus. LA consumptions and pain scorings were documented until the second postoperative evening. RESULTS: Eighty-four datasets were analyzed (CEI: n = 40, PIEB: n = 44). Regarding the primary endpoint, cumulative LA PCEA bolus volumes until day 2 differed significantly between the groups [PIEB 10 mL (2–28 mL) versus CEI, 28 mL (12–64 mL), median (25th–75th percentiles), p = 0.002]. Overall, LA consumption volumes were significantly lower in the PIEB group versus in the CEI group [PIEB: 329 mL (291–341 mL) vs. CEI: 350 mL (327–381 mL), p = 0.003]. Pain scores were comparable at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrates reduced needs for PCEA bolus in the PIEB group. There were no clinically relevant benefits regarding morphine consumption, pain scorings, or other secondary outcome parameters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered retrospectively in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT03378804), date of registration: December, 20th 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0613-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6208106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62081062018-11-16 Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial Wiesmann, Thomas Hoff, Lilli Prien, Lara Torossian, Alexander Eberhart, Leopold Wulf, Hinnerk Feldmann, Carsten BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Continuous epidural infusion (CEI) is the standard application setting for epidural infusion. A new mode, the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) technique, showed reduced local anesthetic (LA) consumption and improved analgesia in obstetric analgesia. Goal of this trial was to evaluate the effects of PIEB versus CEI [combined with patient-controlled bolus (PCEA)] on LA consumption and pain scorings in major abdominal cancer surgery. METHODS: Following ethical approval, patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery under general anesthesia in combination with epidural analgesia were randomized to receive either a PIEB mode of 6 mL/h or a CEI mode set at 6 mL/h of ropivacaine 0.2%, both combined with a PCEA mode set at a 4 mL bolus. LA consumptions and pain scorings were documented until the second postoperative evening. RESULTS: Eighty-four datasets were analyzed (CEI: n = 40, PIEB: n = 44). Regarding the primary endpoint, cumulative LA PCEA bolus volumes until day 2 differed significantly between the groups [PIEB 10 mL (2–28 mL) versus CEI, 28 mL (12–64 mL), median (25th–75th percentiles), p = 0.002]. Overall, LA consumption volumes were significantly lower in the PIEB group versus in the CEI group [PIEB: 329 mL (291–341 mL) vs. CEI: 350 mL (327–381 mL), p = 0.003]. Pain scores were comparable at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrates reduced needs for PCEA bolus in the PIEB group. There were no clinically relevant benefits regarding morphine consumption, pain scorings, or other secondary outcome parameters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered retrospectively in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT03378804), date of registration: December, 20th 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0613-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6208106/ /pubmed/30376810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0613-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wiesmann, Thomas
Hoff, Lilli
Prien, Lara
Torossian, Alexander
Eberhart, Leopold
Wulf, Hinnerk
Feldmann, Carsten
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial
title Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial
title_full Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial
title_fullStr Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial
title_short Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial
title_sort programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0613-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wiesmannthomas programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial
AT hofflilli programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial
AT prienlara programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial
AT torossianalexander programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial
AT eberhartleopold programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial
AT wulfhinnerk programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial
AT feldmanncarsten programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial