Cargando…
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Continuous epidural infusion (CEI) is the standard application setting for epidural infusion. A new mode, the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) technique, showed reduced local anesthetic (LA) consumption and improved analgesia in obstetric analgesia. Goal of this trial was to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0613-6 |
_version_ | 1783366653115891712 |
---|---|
author | Wiesmann, Thomas Hoff, Lilli Prien, Lara Torossian, Alexander Eberhart, Leopold Wulf, Hinnerk Feldmann, Carsten |
author_facet | Wiesmann, Thomas Hoff, Lilli Prien, Lara Torossian, Alexander Eberhart, Leopold Wulf, Hinnerk Feldmann, Carsten |
author_sort | Wiesmann, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Continuous epidural infusion (CEI) is the standard application setting for epidural infusion. A new mode, the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) technique, showed reduced local anesthetic (LA) consumption and improved analgesia in obstetric analgesia. Goal of this trial was to evaluate the effects of PIEB versus CEI [combined with patient-controlled bolus (PCEA)] on LA consumption and pain scorings in major abdominal cancer surgery. METHODS: Following ethical approval, patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery under general anesthesia in combination with epidural analgesia were randomized to receive either a PIEB mode of 6 mL/h or a CEI mode set at 6 mL/h of ropivacaine 0.2%, both combined with a PCEA mode set at a 4 mL bolus. LA consumptions and pain scorings were documented until the second postoperative evening. RESULTS: Eighty-four datasets were analyzed (CEI: n = 40, PIEB: n = 44). Regarding the primary endpoint, cumulative LA PCEA bolus volumes until day 2 differed significantly between the groups [PIEB 10 mL (2–28 mL) versus CEI, 28 mL (12–64 mL), median (25th–75th percentiles), p = 0.002]. Overall, LA consumption volumes were significantly lower in the PIEB group versus in the CEI group [PIEB: 329 mL (291–341 mL) vs. CEI: 350 mL (327–381 mL), p = 0.003]. Pain scores were comparable at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrates reduced needs for PCEA bolus in the PIEB group. There were no clinically relevant benefits regarding morphine consumption, pain scorings, or other secondary outcome parameters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered retrospectively in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT03378804), date of registration: December, 20th 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0613-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6208106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62081062018-11-16 Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial Wiesmann, Thomas Hoff, Lilli Prien, Lara Torossian, Alexander Eberhart, Leopold Wulf, Hinnerk Feldmann, Carsten BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Continuous epidural infusion (CEI) is the standard application setting for epidural infusion. A new mode, the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) technique, showed reduced local anesthetic (LA) consumption and improved analgesia in obstetric analgesia. Goal of this trial was to evaluate the effects of PIEB versus CEI [combined with patient-controlled bolus (PCEA)] on LA consumption and pain scorings in major abdominal cancer surgery. METHODS: Following ethical approval, patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery under general anesthesia in combination with epidural analgesia were randomized to receive either a PIEB mode of 6 mL/h or a CEI mode set at 6 mL/h of ropivacaine 0.2%, both combined with a PCEA mode set at a 4 mL bolus. LA consumptions and pain scorings were documented until the second postoperative evening. RESULTS: Eighty-four datasets were analyzed (CEI: n = 40, PIEB: n = 44). Regarding the primary endpoint, cumulative LA PCEA bolus volumes until day 2 differed significantly between the groups [PIEB 10 mL (2–28 mL) versus CEI, 28 mL (12–64 mL), median (25th–75th percentiles), p = 0.002]. Overall, LA consumption volumes were significantly lower in the PIEB group versus in the CEI group [PIEB: 329 mL (291–341 mL) vs. CEI: 350 mL (327–381 mL), p = 0.003]. Pain scores were comparable at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrates reduced needs for PCEA bolus in the PIEB group. There were no clinically relevant benefits regarding morphine consumption, pain scorings, or other secondary outcome parameters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered retrospectively in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT03378804), date of registration: December, 20th 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0613-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6208106/ /pubmed/30376810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0613-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wiesmann, Thomas Hoff, Lilli Prien, Lara Torossian, Alexander Eberhart, Leopold Wulf, Hinnerk Feldmann, Carsten Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial |
title | Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial |
title_full | Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial |
title_short | Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial |
title_sort | programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0613-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiesmannthomas programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial AT hofflilli programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial AT prienlara programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial AT torossianalexander programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial AT eberhartleopold programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial AT wulfhinnerk programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial AT feldmanncarsten programmedintermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftermajorabdominalandgynecologicalcancersurgeryarandomizedtripleblindedclinicaltrial |