Cargando…

Bone density and pain response following intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for vertebral metastases - secondary results of a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized trial that analyzed bone density and pain response following fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for palliative management of spinal metastases. METHODS/MAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sprave, Tanja, Verma, Vivek, Förster, Robert, Schlampp, Ingmar, Hees, Katharina, Bruckner, Thomas, Bostel, Tilman, El Shafie, Rami Ateyah, Welzel, Thomas, Nicolay, Nils Henrik, Debus, Jürgen, Rief, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1161-4
_version_ 1783366655138594816
author Sprave, Tanja
Verma, Vivek
Förster, Robert
Schlampp, Ingmar
Hees, Katharina
Bruckner, Thomas
Bostel, Tilman
El Shafie, Rami Ateyah
Welzel, Thomas
Nicolay, Nils Henrik
Debus, Jürgen
Rief, Harald
author_facet Sprave, Tanja
Verma, Vivek
Förster, Robert
Schlampp, Ingmar
Hees, Katharina
Bruckner, Thomas
Bostel, Tilman
El Shafie, Rami Ateyah
Welzel, Thomas
Nicolay, Nils Henrik
Debus, Jürgen
Rief, Harald
author_sort Sprave, Tanja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized trial that analyzed bone density and pain response following fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for palliative management of spinal metastases. METHODS/MATERIALS: Sixty patients were enrolled in the single-institutional randomized exploratory trial, randomly assigned to receive IMRT or 3DCRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions). Along with pain response (measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Chow criteria), quantitative bone density was evaluated at baseline, 3, and 6 months in both irradiated and unirradiated spinal bodies, along with rates of pathologic fractures and vertebral compression fractures. RESULTS: Relative to baseline, bone density increased at 3 and 6 months following IMRT by a median of 24.8% and 33.8%, respectively (p < 0.01 and p = 0.048). These figures in the 3DCRT cohort were 18.5% and 48.4%, respectively (p < 0.01 for both). There were no statistical differences in bone density between IMRT and 3DCRT at 3 (p = 0.723) or 6 months (p = 0.341). Subgroup analysis of osteolytic and osteoblastic metastases showed no differences between groups; however, mixed metastases showed an increase in bone density over baseline in the IMRT (but not 3DCRT) arm. The 3-month rate of the pathological fractures was 15.0% in the IMRT arm vs. 10.5% in the 3DCRT arm. There were no differences in pathological fractures at 3 (p = 0.676) and 6 (p = 1.000) months. The IMRT arm showed improved VAS scores at 3 (p = 0.037) but not 6 months (p = 0.430). Using Chow criteria, pain response was similar at both 3 (p = 0.395) and 6 (p = 0.732) months. CONCLUSIONS: This the first prospective investigation evaluating the impact of IMRT vs. 3DCRT on bone density. Along with pain response and pathologic fracture rates, significant rises in bone density after 3 and 6 months were similar in both cohorts. Future randomized investigations with larger sample sizes are recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT, NCT02832830. Registered 14 July 2016
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6208115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62081152018-11-16 Bone density and pain response following intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for vertebral metastases - secondary results of a randomized trial Sprave, Tanja Verma, Vivek Förster, Robert Schlampp, Ingmar Hees, Katharina Bruckner, Thomas Bostel, Tilman El Shafie, Rami Ateyah Welzel, Thomas Nicolay, Nils Henrik Debus, Jürgen Rief, Harald Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized trial that analyzed bone density and pain response following fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for palliative management of spinal metastases. METHODS/MATERIALS: Sixty patients were enrolled in the single-institutional randomized exploratory trial, randomly assigned to receive IMRT or 3DCRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions). Along with pain response (measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Chow criteria), quantitative bone density was evaluated at baseline, 3, and 6 months in both irradiated and unirradiated spinal bodies, along with rates of pathologic fractures and vertebral compression fractures. RESULTS: Relative to baseline, bone density increased at 3 and 6 months following IMRT by a median of 24.8% and 33.8%, respectively (p < 0.01 and p = 0.048). These figures in the 3DCRT cohort were 18.5% and 48.4%, respectively (p < 0.01 for both). There were no statistical differences in bone density between IMRT and 3DCRT at 3 (p = 0.723) or 6 months (p = 0.341). Subgroup analysis of osteolytic and osteoblastic metastases showed no differences between groups; however, mixed metastases showed an increase in bone density over baseline in the IMRT (but not 3DCRT) arm. The 3-month rate of the pathological fractures was 15.0% in the IMRT arm vs. 10.5% in the 3DCRT arm. There were no differences in pathological fractures at 3 (p = 0.676) and 6 (p = 1.000) months. The IMRT arm showed improved VAS scores at 3 (p = 0.037) but not 6 months (p = 0.430). Using Chow criteria, pain response was similar at both 3 (p = 0.395) and 6 (p = 0.732) months. CONCLUSIONS: This the first prospective investigation evaluating the impact of IMRT vs. 3DCRT on bone density. Along with pain response and pathologic fracture rates, significant rises in bone density after 3 and 6 months were similar in both cohorts. Future randomized investigations with larger sample sizes are recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT, NCT02832830. Registered 14 July 2016 BioMed Central 2018-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6208115/ /pubmed/30376859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1161-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sprave, Tanja
Verma, Vivek
Förster, Robert
Schlampp, Ingmar
Hees, Katharina
Bruckner, Thomas
Bostel, Tilman
El Shafie, Rami Ateyah
Welzel, Thomas
Nicolay, Nils Henrik
Debus, Jürgen
Rief, Harald
Bone density and pain response following intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for vertebral metastases - secondary results of a randomized trial
title Bone density and pain response following intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for vertebral metastases - secondary results of a randomized trial
title_full Bone density and pain response following intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for vertebral metastases - secondary results of a randomized trial
title_fullStr Bone density and pain response following intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for vertebral metastases - secondary results of a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Bone density and pain response following intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for vertebral metastases - secondary results of a randomized trial
title_short Bone density and pain response following intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for vertebral metastases - secondary results of a randomized trial
title_sort bone density and pain response following intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for vertebral metastases - secondary results of a randomized trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1161-4
work_keys_str_mv AT spravetanja bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial
AT vermavivek bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial
AT forsterrobert bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial
AT schlamppingmar bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial
AT heeskatharina bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial
AT brucknerthomas bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial
AT bosteltilman bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial
AT elshafieramiateyah bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial
AT welzelthomas bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial
AT nicolaynilshenrik bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial
AT debusjurgen bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial
AT riefharald bonedensityandpainresponsefollowingintensitymodulatedradiotherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiotherapyforvertebralmetastasessecondaryresultsofarandomizedtrial