Cargando…

Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients

PURPOSE: The Patient Roles and Responsibilities Scale (PRRS) was developed to enable a broader evaluation of the impact of cancer and cancer treatment, measuring ‘real world’ roles and responsibilities such as caring for others and financial and employment responsibilities. Here, we report the devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shilling, Valerie, Starkings, Rachel, Jenkins, Valerie, Cella, David, Fallowfield, Lesley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1940-2
_version_ 1783366730283745280
author Shilling, Valerie
Starkings, Rachel
Jenkins, Valerie
Cella, David
Fallowfield, Lesley
author_facet Shilling, Valerie
Starkings, Rachel
Jenkins, Valerie
Cella, David
Fallowfield, Lesley
author_sort Shilling, Valerie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Patient Roles and Responsibilities Scale (PRRS) was developed to enable a broader evaluation of the impact of cancer and cancer treatment, measuring ‘real world’ roles and responsibilities such as caring for others and financial and employment responsibilities. Here, we report the development and initial validation. METHODS: The 29-item PRRS was developed from the thematic analysis of two interview studies with cancer patients and caregivers. In the evaluation study, participants completed the PRRS alongside the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI), the main criterion measure for concurrent validity, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General and WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) for additional convergent validity data. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, 7-days (PRRS only) and 2 months. Demographic data and patient characteristics were collected at baseline. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients with stage III/IV breast, lung or gynaecological cancer or melanoma completed the PRRS at least once. Five items performed poorly and were removed from the scale. The final 16 core items selected comprised 3 dimensions: family well-being, responsibilities and social life, and financial well-being, identified in principal component analysis, accounting for 61.5% of total variance. Missing data (0.6%) and floor/ceiling effects were low (0%/1.5%). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.9 for the PRRS-16; 0.79–0.87 for the subscales. PRRS showed good test–retest reliability (ICC-0.86), sensitivity to change and the predicted pattern of correlation with validation measures r = |0.65–0.77|. The standalone 7-item jobs and careers subscale requires further validation. CONCLUSIONS: Initial evaluation shows that the PRRS is psychometrically robust with potential to inform the evaluation of new treatments in clinical trials and real-world studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-018-1940-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6208586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62085862018-11-09 Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients Shilling, Valerie Starkings, Rachel Jenkins, Valerie Cella, David Fallowfield, Lesley Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The Patient Roles and Responsibilities Scale (PRRS) was developed to enable a broader evaluation of the impact of cancer and cancer treatment, measuring ‘real world’ roles and responsibilities such as caring for others and financial and employment responsibilities. Here, we report the development and initial validation. METHODS: The 29-item PRRS was developed from the thematic analysis of two interview studies with cancer patients and caregivers. In the evaluation study, participants completed the PRRS alongside the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI), the main criterion measure for concurrent validity, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General and WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) for additional convergent validity data. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, 7-days (PRRS only) and 2 months. Demographic data and patient characteristics were collected at baseline. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients with stage III/IV breast, lung or gynaecological cancer or melanoma completed the PRRS at least once. Five items performed poorly and were removed from the scale. The final 16 core items selected comprised 3 dimensions: family well-being, responsibilities and social life, and financial well-being, identified in principal component analysis, accounting for 61.5% of total variance. Missing data (0.6%) and floor/ceiling effects were low (0%/1.5%). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.9 for the PRRS-16; 0.79–0.87 for the subscales. PRRS showed good test–retest reliability (ICC-0.86), sensitivity to change and the predicted pattern of correlation with validation measures r = |0.65–0.77|. The standalone 7-item jobs and careers subscale requires further validation. CONCLUSIONS: Initial evaluation shows that the PRRS is psychometrically robust with potential to inform the evaluation of new treatments in clinical trials and real-world studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-018-1940-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-07-26 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6208586/ /pubmed/30051259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1940-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Shilling, Valerie
Starkings, Rachel
Jenkins, Valerie
Cella, David
Fallowfield, Lesley
Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients
title Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients
title_full Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients
title_fullStr Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients
title_short Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients
title_sort development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1940-2
work_keys_str_mv AT shillingvalerie developmentandvalidationofthepatientrolesandresponsibilitiesscaleincancerpatients
AT starkingsrachel developmentandvalidationofthepatientrolesandresponsibilitiesscaleincancerpatients
AT jenkinsvalerie developmentandvalidationofthepatientrolesandresponsibilitiesscaleincancerpatients
AT celladavid developmentandvalidationofthepatientrolesandresponsibilitiesscaleincancerpatients
AT fallowfieldlesley developmentandvalidationofthepatientrolesandresponsibilitiesscaleincancerpatients