Cargando…

Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews

Background The Medicines use review (MUR) service, provided by community pharmacists, seeks to optimise patients’ use of medicines. There is limited evidence on the clinical effectiveness of this service. Structuring MURs to include an assessment of prescribing appropriateness, facilitated by a vali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cardwell, Karen, Hughes, Carmel M., Ryan, Cristín
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29796962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z
_version_ 1783366731222220800
author Cardwell, Karen
Hughes, Carmel M.
Ryan, Cristín
author_facet Cardwell, Karen
Hughes, Carmel M.
Ryan, Cristín
author_sort Cardwell, Karen
collection PubMed
description Background The Medicines use review (MUR) service, provided by community pharmacists, seeks to optimise patients’ use of medicines. There is limited evidence on the clinical effectiveness of this service. Structuring MURs to include an assessment of prescribing appropriateness, facilitated by a validated prescribing screening tool, has the capacity to enhance this service. Objective To explore community pharmacists’ views on the facilitators and barriers towards the utilisation of a screening tool as a guide to conducting structured MURs. Setting Community Pharmacy, Northern Ireland. Method Using the 14 domain Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), semi-structured interviews were conducted with community pharmacists. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework method. Main Outcome Measure Pharmacists’ views towards utilisation of a screening tool as a guide to conducting structured MURs. Results Based on the analysis of 15 interviews, 11 TDF domains (‘Knowledge’, ‘Skills’, ‘Social and professional role and identity’, ‘Beliefs about capabilities’, ‘Beliefs about consequences’, ‘Reinforcement’, ‘Goals’, ‘Memory, attention and decision process’, ‘Environmental context and resources’, ‘Social influences’, ‘Behavioural regulation’) were deemed relevant. Facilitators included: knowledge of patients, clinical knowledge, perceived professional role, patients’ clinical outcomes, influence of peers. Barriers included: prioritisation of other clinical activities, inability to access patients’ clinical information, perceived alienation from the primary healthcare team and staffing issues. Conclusions Using the TDF, key facilitators and barriers were identified in the use of a screening tool as a guide to conducting MURs. These findings may assist in further development of MURs as a means to optimise patients’ medicines use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6208598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62085982018-11-09 Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews Cardwell, Karen Hughes, Carmel M. Ryan, Cristín Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background The Medicines use review (MUR) service, provided by community pharmacists, seeks to optimise patients’ use of medicines. There is limited evidence on the clinical effectiveness of this service. Structuring MURs to include an assessment of prescribing appropriateness, facilitated by a validated prescribing screening tool, has the capacity to enhance this service. Objective To explore community pharmacists’ views on the facilitators and barriers towards the utilisation of a screening tool as a guide to conducting structured MURs. Setting Community Pharmacy, Northern Ireland. Method Using the 14 domain Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), semi-structured interviews were conducted with community pharmacists. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework method. Main Outcome Measure Pharmacists’ views towards utilisation of a screening tool as a guide to conducting structured MURs. Results Based on the analysis of 15 interviews, 11 TDF domains (‘Knowledge’, ‘Skills’, ‘Social and professional role and identity’, ‘Beliefs about capabilities’, ‘Beliefs about consequences’, ‘Reinforcement’, ‘Goals’, ‘Memory, attention and decision process’, ‘Environmental context and resources’, ‘Social influences’, ‘Behavioural regulation’) were deemed relevant. Facilitators included: knowledge of patients, clinical knowledge, perceived professional role, patients’ clinical outcomes, influence of peers. Barriers included: prioritisation of other clinical activities, inability to access patients’ clinical information, perceived alienation from the primary healthcare team and staffing issues. Conclusions Using the TDF, key facilitators and barriers were identified in the use of a screening tool as a guide to conducting MURs. These findings may assist in further development of MURs as a means to optimise patients’ medicines use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-05-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6208598/ /pubmed/29796962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cardwell, Karen
Hughes, Carmel M.
Ryan, Cristín
Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews
title Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews
title_full Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews
title_fullStr Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews
title_full_unstemmed Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews
title_short Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews
title_sort community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29796962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z
work_keys_str_mv AT cardwellkaren communitypharmacistsviewsofusingascreeningtooltostructuremedicinesusereviewsforolderpeoplefindingsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT hughescarmelm communitypharmacistsviewsofusingascreeningtooltostructuremedicinesusereviewsforolderpeoplefindingsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT ryancristin communitypharmacistsviewsofusingascreeningtooltostructuremedicinesusereviewsforolderpeoplefindingsfromqualitativeinterviews