Cargando…
Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews
Background The Medicines use review (MUR) service, provided by community pharmacists, seeks to optimise patients’ use of medicines. There is limited evidence on the clinical effectiveness of this service. Structuring MURs to include an assessment of prescribing appropriateness, facilitated by a vali...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29796962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z |
_version_ | 1783366731222220800 |
---|---|
author | Cardwell, Karen Hughes, Carmel M. Ryan, Cristín |
author_facet | Cardwell, Karen Hughes, Carmel M. Ryan, Cristín |
author_sort | Cardwell, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background The Medicines use review (MUR) service, provided by community pharmacists, seeks to optimise patients’ use of medicines. There is limited evidence on the clinical effectiveness of this service. Structuring MURs to include an assessment of prescribing appropriateness, facilitated by a validated prescribing screening tool, has the capacity to enhance this service. Objective To explore community pharmacists’ views on the facilitators and barriers towards the utilisation of a screening tool as a guide to conducting structured MURs. Setting Community Pharmacy, Northern Ireland. Method Using the 14 domain Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), semi-structured interviews were conducted with community pharmacists. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework method. Main Outcome Measure Pharmacists’ views towards utilisation of a screening tool as a guide to conducting structured MURs. Results Based on the analysis of 15 interviews, 11 TDF domains (‘Knowledge’, ‘Skills’, ‘Social and professional role and identity’, ‘Beliefs about capabilities’, ‘Beliefs about consequences’, ‘Reinforcement’, ‘Goals’, ‘Memory, attention and decision process’, ‘Environmental context and resources’, ‘Social influences’, ‘Behavioural regulation’) were deemed relevant. Facilitators included: knowledge of patients, clinical knowledge, perceived professional role, patients’ clinical outcomes, influence of peers. Barriers included: prioritisation of other clinical activities, inability to access patients’ clinical information, perceived alienation from the primary healthcare team and staffing issues. Conclusions Using the TDF, key facilitators and barriers were identified in the use of a screening tool as a guide to conducting MURs. These findings may assist in further development of MURs as a means to optimise patients’ medicines use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6208598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62085982018-11-09 Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews Cardwell, Karen Hughes, Carmel M. Ryan, Cristín Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background The Medicines use review (MUR) service, provided by community pharmacists, seeks to optimise patients’ use of medicines. There is limited evidence on the clinical effectiveness of this service. Structuring MURs to include an assessment of prescribing appropriateness, facilitated by a validated prescribing screening tool, has the capacity to enhance this service. Objective To explore community pharmacists’ views on the facilitators and barriers towards the utilisation of a screening tool as a guide to conducting structured MURs. Setting Community Pharmacy, Northern Ireland. Method Using the 14 domain Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), semi-structured interviews were conducted with community pharmacists. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework method. Main Outcome Measure Pharmacists’ views towards utilisation of a screening tool as a guide to conducting structured MURs. Results Based on the analysis of 15 interviews, 11 TDF domains (‘Knowledge’, ‘Skills’, ‘Social and professional role and identity’, ‘Beliefs about capabilities’, ‘Beliefs about consequences’, ‘Reinforcement’, ‘Goals’, ‘Memory, attention and decision process’, ‘Environmental context and resources’, ‘Social influences’, ‘Behavioural regulation’) were deemed relevant. Facilitators included: knowledge of patients, clinical knowledge, perceived professional role, patients’ clinical outcomes, influence of peers. Barriers included: prioritisation of other clinical activities, inability to access patients’ clinical information, perceived alienation from the primary healthcare team and staffing issues. Conclusions Using the TDF, key facilitators and barriers were identified in the use of a screening tool as a guide to conducting MURs. These findings may assist in further development of MURs as a means to optimise patients’ medicines use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-05-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6208598/ /pubmed/29796962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cardwell, Karen Hughes, Carmel M. Ryan, Cristín Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews |
title | Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews |
title_full | Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews |
title_fullStr | Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews |
title_short | Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews |
title_sort | community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29796962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cardwellkaren communitypharmacistsviewsofusingascreeningtooltostructuremedicinesusereviewsforolderpeoplefindingsfromqualitativeinterviews AT hughescarmelm communitypharmacistsviewsofusingascreeningtooltostructuremedicinesusereviewsforolderpeoplefindingsfromqualitativeinterviews AT ryancristin communitypharmacistsviewsofusingascreeningtooltostructuremedicinesusereviewsforolderpeoplefindingsfromqualitativeinterviews |