Cargando…

Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: A rising incidence of kidney stone disease has led to an increase in ureteroscopy (URS) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Our aim was to compare the cost of URS and SWL for treatment of stones. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on Cochrane and PRISMA standards was co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Geraghty, Robert M., Jones, Patrick, Herrmann, Thomas R. W., Aboumarzouk, Omar, Somani, Bhaskar K.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:	Invited Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29730839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2320-9

Ejemplares similares

Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in anomalous kidneys: a systematic review
por: Lavan, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy
por: Khalil, Mostafa
Publicado: (2013)

Semi-rigid ureteroscopy: indications, tips, and tricks
por: Whitehurst, Lily A., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment Outcomes between Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteral Stones
por: Lee, Jong-Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in patients with proximal ureteral stones under the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Wang, Peng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Management of upper ureteral stones exceeding 15 mm in diameter: Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy with holmium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser lithotripsy
por: Aboutaleb, Hamdy, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole and non-lower pole stones from a university teaching hospital: Parallel group comparison during the same time period
por: Geraghty, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Ureteroscopy and stone treatment in the elderly (≥70 years): prospective outcomes over 5- years with a review of literature
por: Prattley, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Ureteroscopy for stones in solitary kidney: Preferred not just a standard option
por: Jones, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy? Opinion: NO
por: Vicentini, Fabio C.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm
por: Yao, Feng, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Shock-wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy for renal stones?
por: Ferraro, Pietro Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Paediatric Ureteroscopy (P-URS) reporting checklist: a new tool to aid studies report the essential items on paediatric ureteroscopy for stone disease
por: Juliebø-Jones, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Safety and feasibility of day case ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (URSL) in patients with a solitary kidney
por: Ghosh, Anngona, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Outcomes of ureteroscopy for patients with stones in a solitary kidney: evidence from a systematic review
por: Jones, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy? Opinion: YES
por: J.F., Donaldson
Publicado: (2015)

Ureteroscopy for stone disease: expanding roles in the modern era
por: Ho, Adrian, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Is flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy the new gold standard for lower pole renal stones when compared to shock wave lithotripsy: Comparative outcomes from a University hospital over similar time period
por: Burr, Jacob, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Successful ureteroscopy for kidney stone disease leads to resolution of urinary tract infections: Prospective outcomes with a 12-month follow-up
por: Oliver, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Factors affecting operative time during ureteroscopy and stone treatment and its effect on outcomes: retrospective results over 6.5 years
por: Whitehurst, Lily, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Association between time to lithotripsy and stone-free rate in patients with ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy
por: Washino, Satoshi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Current Place of Shock-Wave Lithotripsy for Bile Duct Stones
por: Toouli, J.
Publicado: (1990)

Lower pole renal stone: flexible ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy? The anatomy is the key
Publicado: (2018)

Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors
por: Yazici, Ozgur, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A Systematic Review on Comparative Analyses between Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Shock-Wave Lithotripsy for Ureter Stone According to Stone Size
por: Jung, Hae Do, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Outcomes of ureteroscopy (URS) for stone disease in the paediatric population: results of over 100 URS procedures from a UK tertiary centre
por: Jones, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effects of hydrochlorothiazide on kidney stone therapy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
por: Tehranchi, Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Feasibility and safety of bilateral same-session flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for renal and ureteral stone disease
por: Drake, Tamsin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Outcome of ureteroscopy for stone disease in patients with horseshoe kidney: Review of world literature
por: Ishii, Hiro, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Ureteric stents on extraction strings: a systematic review of literature
por: Oliver, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Primary ureteroscopy versus emergency stenting and delayed ureteroscopy: Is there a winner?
por: Somani, Bhaskar K., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease in Paediatric Population is Safe and Effective in Medium-Volume and High-Volume Centres: Evidence from a Systematic Review
por: Rob, Shazna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Role of Minimally Invasive (Micro and Ultra-mini) PCNL for Adult Urinary Stone Disease in the Modern Era: Evidence from a Systematic Review
por: Jones, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evaluation of Possible Predictive Variables for the Outcome of Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Stones
por: Park, Yong Il, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success
por: Abdelghany, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Usefulness of Early Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Colic Patients with Ureteral Stones
por: Choi, Hyeung Joon, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones according to ESWL intensity
por: Yoon, Ji Hyung, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A new prediction model for operative time of flexible ureteroscopy with lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones
por: Kuroda, Shinnosuke, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Trends of intervention for paediatric stone disease over the last two decades (2000–2015): A systematic review of literature
por: Pietropaolo, Amelia, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater: A single institutional experience
por: Huang, Jian-Sheng, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_qmsmk9784g1vl69mdt8v2ieesv