Cargando…
Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation
The size or stage of interacting individuals is known to affect the outcome of ecological interactions and can have important consequences for population dynamics. This is also true for intraguild predation (the killing and eating of potential competitors), where the size or ontogenetic stage of an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30173383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4256-6 |
_version_ | 1783366754718711808 |
---|---|
author | Fonseca, Morgana Maria Pallini, Angelo Lima, Eraldo Janssen, Arne |
author_facet | Fonseca, Morgana Maria Pallini, Angelo Lima, Eraldo Janssen, Arne |
author_sort | Fonseca, Morgana Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | The size or stage of interacting individuals is known to affect the outcome of ecological interactions and can have important consequences for population dynamics. This is also true for intraguild predation (the killing and eating of potential competitors), where the size or ontogenetic stage of an individual determines whether it is the intraguild predator or the intraguild prey. Studying size- or stage-specific interactions is therefore important, but can be challenging in species with complex life histories. Here, we investigated predatory interactions of all feeding stages of the two predatory mite species Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus macropilis, both of which have complex life cycles, typical for predatory arthropods. Populations of these two species compete for two-spotted spider mites, their prey. We evaluated both the capacity to kill stages of the other predator species and the capacity to benefit from feeding on these stages, both prerequisites for the occurrence of intraguild predation. Ontogeny played a critical role in the occurrence of intraguild predation. Whereas the juveniles of P. macropilis developed from larva until adulthood when feeding on N. californicus eggs, interestingly, adult female P. macropilis did not feed on the smaller stages of the other species. We furthermore show that intraguild predation was reciprocal: both juveniles and adult females of N. californicus preyed on the smallest stages of P. macropilis. These results suggest that a proper analysis of the interactions between pairs of species involved in intraguild predation should start with an inventory of the interactions among all ontogenetic stages of these species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6208696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62086962018-11-09 Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation Fonseca, Morgana Maria Pallini, Angelo Lima, Eraldo Janssen, Arne Oecologia Population Ecology–Original Research The size or stage of interacting individuals is known to affect the outcome of ecological interactions and can have important consequences for population dynamics. This is also true for intraguild predation (the killing and eating of potential competitors), where the size or ontogenetic stage of an individual determines whether it is the intraguild predator or the intraguild prey. Studying size- or stage-specific interactions is therefore important, but can be challenging in species with complex life histories. Here, we investigated predatory interactions of all feeding stages of the two predatory mite species Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus macropilis, both of which have complex life cycles, typical for predatory arthropods. Populations of these two species compete for two-spotted spider mites, their prey. We evaluated both the capacity to kill stages of the other predator species and the capacity to benefit from feeding on these stages, both prerequisites for the occurrence of intraguild predation. Ontogeny played a critical role in the occurrence of intraguild predation. Whereas the juveniles of P. macropilis developed from larva until adulthood when feeding on N. californicus eggs, interestingly, adult female P. macropilis did not feed on the smaller stages of the other species. We furthermore show that intraguild predation was reciprocal: both juveniles and adult females of N. californicus preyed on the smallest stages of P. macropilis. These results suggest that a proper analysis of the interactions between pairs of species involved in intraguild predation should start with an inventory of the interactions among all ontogenetic stages of these species. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-09-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6208696/ /pubmed/30173383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4256-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Population Ecology–Original Research Fonseca, Morgana Maria Pallini, Angelo Lima, Eraldo Janssen, Arne Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation |
title | Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation |
title_full | Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation |
title_fullStr | Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation |
title_full_unstemmed | Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation |
title_short | Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation |
title_sort | ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation |
topic | Population Ecology–Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30173383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4256-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fonsecamorganamaria ontogeneticstagespecificreciprocalintraguildpredation AT palliniangelo ontogeneticstagespecificreciprocalintraguildpredation AT limaeraldo ontogeneticstagespecificreciprocalintraguildpredation AT janssenarne ontogeneticstagespecificreciprocalintraguildpredation |