Cargando…

Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation

The size or stage of interacting individuals is known to affect the outcome of ecological interactions and can have important consequences for population dynamics. This is also true for intraguild predation (the killing and eating of potential competitors), where the size or ontogenetic stage of an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fonseca, Morgana Maria, Pallini, Angelo, Lima, Eraldo, Janssen, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30173383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4256-6
_version_ 1783366754718711808
author Fonseca, Morgana Maria
Pallini, Angelo
Lima, Eraldo
Janssen, Arne
author_facet Fonseca, Morgana Maria
Pallini, Angelo
Lima, Eraldo
Janssen, Arne
author_sort Fonseca, Morgana Maria
collection PubMed
description The size or stage of interacting individuals is known to affect the outcome of ecological interactions and can have important consequences for population dynamics. This is also true for intraguild predation (the killing and eating of potential competitors), where the size or ontogenetic stage of an individual determines whether it is the intraguild predator or the intraguild prey. Studying size- or stage-specific interactions is therefore important, but can be challenging in species with complex life histories. Here, we investigated predatory interactions of all feeding stages of the two predatory mite species Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus macropilis, both of which have complex life cycles, typical for predatory arthropods. Populations of these two species compete for two-spotted spider mites, their prey. We evaluated both the capacity to kill stages of the other predator species and the capacity to benefit from feeding on these stages, both prerequisites for the occurrence of intraguild predation. Ontogeny played a critical role in the occurrence of intraguild predation. Whereas the juveniles of P. macropilis developed from larva until adulthood when feeding on N. californicus eggs, interestingly, adult female P. macropilis did not feed on the smaller stages of the other species. We furthermore show that intraguild predation was reciprocal: both juveniles and adult females of N. californicus preyed on the smallest stages of P. macropilis. These results suggest that a proper analysis of the interactions between pairs of species involved in intraguild predation should start with an inventory of the interactions among all ontogenetic stages of these species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6208696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62086962018-11-09 Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation Fonseca, Morgana Maria Pallini, Angelo Lima, Eraldo Janssen, Arne Oecologia Population Ecology–Original Research The size or stage of interacting individuals is known to affect the outcome of ecological interactions and can have important consequences for population dynamics. This is also true for intraguild predation (the killing and eating of potential competitors), where the size or ontogenetic stage of an individual determines whether it is the intraguild predator or the intraguild prey. Studying size- or stage-specific interactions is therefore important, but can be challenging in species with complex life histories. Here, we investigated predatory interactions of all feeding stages of the two predatory mite species Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus macropilis, both of which have complex life cycles, typical for predatory arthropods. Populations of these two species compete for two-spotted spider mites, their prey. We evaluated both the capacity to kill stages of the other predator species and the capacity to benefit from feeding on these stages, both prerequisites for the occurrence of intraguild predation. Ontogeny played a critical role in the occurrence of intraguild predation. Whereas the juveniles of P. macropilis developed from larva until adulthood when feeding on N. californicus eggs, interestingly, adult female P. macropilis did not feed on the smaller stages of the other species. We furthermore show that intraguild predation was reciprocal: both juveniles and adult females of N. californicus preyed on the smallest stages of P. macropilis. These results suggest that a proper analysis of the interactions between pairs of species involved in intraguild predation should start with an inventory of the interactions among all ontogenetic stages of these species. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-09-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6208696/ /pubmed/30173383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4256-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Population Ecology–Original Research
Fonseca, Morgana Maria
Pallini, Angelo
Lima, Eraldo
Janssen, Arne
Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation
title Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation
title_full Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation
title_fullStr Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation
title_full_unstemmed Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation
title_short Ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation
title_sort ontogenetic stage-specific reciprocal intraguild predation
topic Population Ecology–Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30173383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4256-6
work_keys_str_mv AT fonsecamorganamaria ontogeneticstagespecificreciprocalintraguildpredation
AT palliniangelo ontogeneticstagespecificreciprocalintraguildpredation
AT limaeraldo ontogeneticstagespecificreciprocalintraguildpredation
AT janssenarne ontogeneticstagespecificreciprocalintraguildpredation