Cargando…

Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior breaks: VIPER Study Report No. 3

PURPOSE: To test if an encircling band improves outcomes in vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment (PRD) with inferior or with multiple (4 or more) breaks. METHODS: Subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial in patients with uncomplicated PRD assigned either t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumgarten, Sabine, Schiller, Petra, Hellmich, Martin, Walter, Peter, Agostini, Hansjürgen, Junker, Bernd, Helbig, Horst, Lommatzsch, Albrecht, Mazinani, Babac
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4106-6
_version_ 1783366761728442368
author Baumgarten, Sabine
Schiller, Petra
Hellmich, Martin
Walter, Peter
Agostini, Hansjürgen
Junker, Bernd
Helbig, Horst
Lommatzsch, Albrecht
Mazinani, Babac
author_facet Baumgarten, Sabine
Schiller, Petra
Hellmich, Martin
Walter, Peter
Agostini, Hansjürgen
Junker, Bernd
Helbig, Horst
Lommatzsch, Albrecht
Mazinani, Babac
author_sort Baumgarten, Sabine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To test if an encircling band improves outcomes in vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment (PRD) with inferior or with multiple (4 or more) breaks. METHODS: Subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial in patients with uncomplicated PRD assigned either to 20 G vitrectomy plus encircling band (group E1), or 20 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group C), or 23/25 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group E2). The primary endpoint was defined as no indication for any retina reattaching procedure during the review period of 6 months. One hundred out of 257 patients were identified with inferior breaks and 63 patients had 4 or more breaks. RESULTS: In patients with retinal breaks between 5:00 and 7:00, treatment was successful in 77.4% (24/31, treatment arm E1) versus 57.1% (16/28, treatment arm C) (p = 0.301, odds ratio (OR) 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 7.17). In patients with multiple breaks, success rates were 68.2% (15/22, E1) versus. 72.4% (21/29, C, p = 0.46, OR 0.52, CI 0.08–3.65). CONCLUSION: Combining an encircling band with vitrectomy in patients with pseudophakic retinal detachment and inferior or multiple breaks does not significantly improve primary anatomical success in comparison to treatment with 20 G or 23/25 G vitrectomy alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6208723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62087232018-11-09 Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior breaks: VIPER Study Report No. 3 Baumgarten, Sabine Schiller, Petra Hellmich, Martin Walter, Peter Agostini, Hansjürgen Junker, Bernd Helbig, Horst Lommatzsch, Albrecht Mazinani, Babac Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Retinal Disorders PURPOSE: To test if an encircling band improves outcomes in vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment (PRD) with inferior or with multiple (4 or more) breaks. METHODS: Subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial in patients with uncomplicated PRD assigned either to 20 G vitrectomy plus encircling band (group E1), or 20 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group C), or 23/25 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group E2). The primary endpoint was defined as no indication for any retina reattaching procedure during the review period of 6 months. One hundred out of 257 patients were identified with inferior breaks and 63 patients had 4 or more breaks. RESULTS: In patients with retinal breaks between 5:00 and 7:00, treatment was successful in 77.4% (24/31, treatment arm E1) versus 57.1% (16/28, treatment arm C) (p = 0.301, odds ratio (OR) 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 7.17). In patients with multiple breaks, success rates were 68.2% (15/22, E1) versus. 72.4% (21/29, C, p = 0.46, OR 0.52, CI 0.08–3.65). CONCLUSION: Combining an encircling band with vitrectomy in patients with pseudophakic retinal detachment and inferior or multiple breaks does not significantly improve primary anatomical success in comparison to treatment with 20 G or 23/25 G vitrectomy alone. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-08-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6208723/ /pubmed/30140963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4106-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Retinal Disorders
Baumgarten, Sabine
Schiller, Petra
Hellmich, Martin
Walter, Peter
Agostini, Hansjürgen
Junker, Bernd
Helbig, Horst
Lommatzsch, Albrecht
Mazinani, Babac
Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior breaks: VIPER Study Report No. 3
title Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior breaks: VIPER Study Report No. 3
title_full Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior breaks: VIPER Study Report No. 3
title_fullStr Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior breaks: VIPER Study Report No. 3
title_full_unstemmed Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior breaks: VIPER Study Report No. 3
title_short Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior breaks: VIPER Study Report No. 3
title_sort vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior breaks: viper study report no. 3
topic Retinal Disorders
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4106-6
work_keys_str_mv AT baumgartensabine vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentwithinferiorbreaksviperstudyreportno3
AT schillerpetra vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentwithinferiorbreaksviperstudyreportno3
AT hellmichmartin vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentwithinferiorbreaksviperstudyreportno3
AT walterpeter vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentwithinferiorbreaksviperstudyreportno3
AT agostinihansjurgen vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentwithinferiorbreaksviperstudyreportno3
AT junkerbernd vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentwithinferiorbreaksviperstudyreportno3
AT helbighorst vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentwithinferiorbreaksviperstudyreportno3
AT lommatzschalbrecht vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentwithinferiorbreaksviperstudyreportno3
AT mazinanibabac vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentwithinferiorbreaksviperstudyreportno3
AT vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentwithinferiorbreaksviperstudyreportno3