Cargando…

Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs

BACKGROUND: The European Food Safety Authority proposed a concept for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants in the EU that is based on the definition of thresholds for the acceptability of potential adverse effects on the environment. This concept, called Limits of Concern...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dolezel, Marion, Miklau, Marianne, Heissenberger, Andreas, Reichenbecher, Wolfram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30416927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0169-6
_version_ 1783366789163384832
author Dolezel, Marion
Miklau, Marianne
Heissenberger, Andreas
Reichenbecher, Wolfram
author_facet Dolezel, Marion
Miklau, Marianne
Heissenberger, Andreas
Reichenbecher, Wolfram
author_sort Dolezel, Marion
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The European Food Safety Authority proposed a concept for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants in the EU that is based on the definition of thresholds for the acceptability of potential adverse effects on the environment. This concept, called Limits of Concern (LoC), needs to be further refined to be implemented in the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms. METHODS: We analyse and discuss how LoC can be defined for the environmental risk assessment for three different types of genetically modified plants. We outline protection goals relevant to the genetically modified plants in question and discuss existing concepts and suggestions for acceptability thresholds from the environmental risk assessment of different regulatory areas. We make specific recommendations for the setting and use of LoC for each type of genetically modified plant. RESULTS: The LoC concept can be suitably applied for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, if the different protection goals in agro-environments are specifically considered. Not only biodiversity protection goals but also agricultural protection goals need to be addressed. The different ecosystem services provided by weeds inside and outside agricultural fields have to be considered for genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Exposure-based LoCs are suggested based on knowledge about dose–effect relationships between maize pollen and non-target Lepidoptera for insect-resistant maize. Due to the long-term nature of biological processes such as spread and establishment, LoCs for genetically modified oilseed rape should be defined for the presence of the genetically modified plant or its genetically modified traits in relevant protection goals. CONCLUSIONS: When setting LoCs, the focus should be on protection goals which are possibly affected. Potential overlaps of the LoC concept with the ecosystem service concept have to be clarified to harmonise protection levels in the agro-environment for different stressors. If additional impacts on agro-biodiversity resulting from the cultivation of genetically modified plants are to be avoided, then high protection levels and low thresholds for acceptable effects (i.e. LoC) should be set.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6208838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62088382018-11-09 Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs Dolezel, Marion Miklau, Marianne Heissenberger, Andreas Reichenbecher, Wolfram Environ Sci Eur Research BACKGROUND: The European Food Safety Authority proposed a concept for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants in the EU that is based on the definition of thresholds for the acceptability of potential adverse effects on the environment. This concept, called Limits of Concern (LoC), needs to be further refined to be implemented in the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms. METHODS: We analyse and discuss how LoC can be defined for the environmental risk assessment for three different types of genetically modified plants. We outline protection goals relevant to the genetically modified plants in question and discuss existing concepts and suggestions for acceptability thresholds from the environmental risk assessment of different regulatory areas. We make specific recommendations for the setting and use of LoC for each type of genetically modified plant. RESULTS: The LoC concept can be suitably applied for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, if the different protection goals in agro-environments are specifically considered. Not only biodiversity protection goals but also agricultural protection goals need to be addressed. The different ecosystem services provided by weeds inside and outside agricultural fields have to be considered for genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Exposure-based LoCs are suggested based on knowledge about dose–effect relationships between maize pollen and non-target Lepidoptera for insect-resistant maize. Due to the long-term nature of biological processes such as spread and establishment, LoCs for genetically modified oilseed rape should be defined for the presence of the genetically modified plant or its genetically modified traits in relevant protection goals. CONCLUSIONS: When setting LoCs, the focus should be on protection goals which are possibly affected. Potential overlaps of the LoC concept with the ecosystem service concept have to be clarified to harmonise protection levels in the agro-environment for different stressors. If additional impacts on agro-biodiversity resulting from the cultivation of genetically modified plants are to be avoided, then high protection levels and low thresholds for acceptable effects (i.e. LoC) should be set. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-10-25 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6208838/ /pubmed/30416927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0169-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Dolezel, Marion
Miklau, Marianne
Heissenberger, Andreas
Reichenbecher, Wolfram
Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs
title Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs
title_full Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs
title_fullStr Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs
title_full_unstemmed Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs
title_short Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs
title_sort limits of concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the era of gmos
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30416927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0169-6
work_keys_str_mv AT dolezelmarion limitsofconcernsuggestionsfortheoperationalisationofaconcepttodeterminetherelevanceofadverseeffectsintheeraofgmos
AT miklaumarianne limitsofconcernsuggestionsfortheoperationalisationofaconcepttodeterminetherelevanceofadverseeffectsintheeraofgmos
AT heissenbergerandreas limitsofconcernsuggestionsfortheoperationalisationofaconcepttodeterminetherelevanceofadverseeffectsintheeraofgmos
AT reichenbecherwolfram limitsofconcernsuggestionsfortheoperationalisationofaconcepttodeterminetherelevanceofadverseeffectsintheeraofgmos