Cargando…
Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform
PURPOSE: The methods (IHC/FISH) typically used to assess ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 in FFPE specimens from breast cancer patients are difficult to set up, perform, and standardize for use in low and middle-income countries. Use of an automated diagnostic platform (GeneXpert®) and assay (Xpert® Breast Ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4889-5 |
_version_ | 1783366806270902272 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Natalie C. Wong, Wendy Ho, Kenneth E. Chu, Victor C. Rizo, Annaliza Davenport, Simon Kelly, Devon Makar, Rosemary Jassem, Jacek Duchnowska, Renata Biernat, Wojciech Radecka, Barbara Fujita, Tomoyuki Klein, Jonathan L. Stonecypher, Mark Ohta, Shoichiro Juhl, Hartmut Weidler, Jodi M. Bates, Michael Press, Michael F. |
author_facet | Wu, Natalie C. Wong, Wendy Ho, Kenneth E. Chu, Victor C. Rizo, Annaliza Davenport, Simon Kelly, Devon Makar, Rosemary Jassem, Jacek Duchnowska, Renata Biernat, Wojciech Radecka, Barbara Fujita, Tomoyuki Klein, Jonathan L. Stonecypher, Mark Ohta, Shoichiro Juhl, Hartmut Weidler, Jodi M. Bates, Michael Press, Michael F. |
author_sort | Wu, Natalie C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The methods (IHC/FISH) typically used to assess ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 in FFPE specimens from breast cancer patients are difficult to set up, perform, and standardize for use in low and middle-income countries. Use of an automated diagnostic platform (GeneXpert®) and assay (Xpert® Breast Cancer STRAT4) that employs RT-qPCR to quantitate ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67 mRNAs from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues facilitates analyses in less than 3 h. This study compares breast cancer biomarker analyses using an RT-qPCR-based platform with analyses using standard IHC and FISH for assessment of the same biomarkers. METHODS: FFPE tissue sections from 523 patients were sent to a College of American Pathologists-certified central reference laboratory to evaluate concordance between IHC/FISH and STRAT4 using the laboratory’s standard of care methods. A subset of 155 FFPE specimens was tested for concordance with STRAT4 using different IHC antibodies and scoring methods. RESULTS: Concordance between STRAT4 and IHC was 97.8% for ESR1, 90.4% for PGR, 93.3% for ERBB2 (IHC/FISH for HER2), and 78.6% for MKi67. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.99, 0.95, 0.99, and 0.85 were generated for ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67, respectively. Minor variabilities were observed depending on the IHC antibody comparator used. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of breast cancer biomarker status by STRAT4 was highly concordant with central IHC/FISH in this blinded, retrospectively analyzed collection of samples. STRAT4 may provide a means to cost-effectively generate standardized diagnostic results for breast cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-4889-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6208911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62089112018-11-09 Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform Wu, Natalie C. Wong, Wendy Ho, Kenneth E. Chu, Victor C. Rizo, Annaliza Davenport, Simon Kelly, Devon Makar, Rosemary Jassem, Jacek Duchnowska, Renata Biernat, Wojciech Radecka, Barbara Fujita, Tomoyuki Klein, Jonathan L. Stonecypher, Mark Ohta, Shoichiro Juhl, Hartmut Weidler, Jodi M. Bates, Michael Press, Michael F. Breast Cancer Res Treat Preclinical Study PURPOSE: The methods (IHC/FISH) typically used to assess ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 in FFPE specimens from breast cancer patients are difficult to set up, perform, and standardize for use in low and middle-income countries. Use of an automated diagnostic platform (GeneXpert®) and assay (Xpert® Breast Cancer STRAT4) that employs RT-qPCR to quantitate ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67 mRNAs from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues facilitates analyses in less than 3 h. This study compares breast cancer biomarker analyses using an RT-qPCR-based platform with analyses using standard IHC and FISH for assessment of the same biomarkers. METHODS: FFPE tissue sections from 523 patients were sent to a College of American Pathologists-certified central reference laboratory to evaluate concordance between IHC/FISH and STRAT4 using the laboratory’s standard of care methods. A subset of 155 FFPE specimens was tested for concordance with STRAT4 using different IHC antibodies and scoring methods. RESULTS: Concordance between STRAT4 and IHC was 97.8% for ESR1, 90.4% for PGR, 93.3% for ERBB2 (IHC/FISH for HER2), and 78.6% for MKi67. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.99, 0.95, 0.99, and 0.85 were generated for ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67, respectively. Minor variabilities were observed depending on the IHC antibody comparator used. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of breast cancer biomarker status by STRAT4 was highly concordant with central IHC/FISH in this blinded, retrospectively analyzed collection of samples. STRAT4 may provide a means to cost-effectively generate standardized diagnostic results for breast cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-4889-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-08-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6208911/ /pubmed/30120700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4889-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Preclinical Study Wu, Natalie C. Wong, Wendy Ho, Kenneth E. Chu, Victor C. Rizo, Annaliza Davenport, Simon Kelly, Devon Makar, Rosemary Jassem, Jacek Duchnowska, Renata Biernat, Wojciech Radecka, Barbara Fujita, Tomoyuki Klein, Jonathan L. Stonecypher, Mark Ohta, Shoichiro Juhl, Hartmut Weidler, Jodi M. Bates, Michael Press, Michael F. Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform |
title | Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform |
title_full | Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform |
title_fullStr | Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform |
title_short | Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform |
title_sort | comparison of central laboratory assessments of er, pr, her2, and ki67 by ihc/fish and the corresponding mrnas (esr1, pgr, erbb2, and mki67) by rt-qpcr on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform |
topic | Preclinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4889-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wunataliec comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT wongwendy comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT hokennethe comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT chuvictorc comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT rizoannaliza comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT davenportsimon comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT kellydevon comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT makarrosemary comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT jassemjacek comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT duchnowskarenata comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT biernatwojciech comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT radeckabarbara comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT fujitatomoyuki comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT kleinjonathanl comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT stonecyphermark comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT ohtashoichiro comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT juhlhartmut comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT weidlerjodim comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT batesmichael comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform AT pressmichaelf comparisonofcentrallaboratoryassessmentsoferprher2andki67byihcfishandthecorrespondingmrnasesr1pgrerbb2andmki67byrtqpcronanautomatedbroadlydeployeddiagnosticplatform |