Cargando…

Gene editing and mutagenesis reveal inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of TaGW2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat

KEY MESSAGE: CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing and EMS mutagenesis revealed inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of TaGW2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat. ABSTRACT: The TaGW2 gene homoeologues have been reported to be negative regulators of grain size (GS) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Wei, Simmonds, James, Pan, Qianli, Davidson, Dwight, He, Fei, Battal, Abdulhamit, Akhunova, Alina, Trick, Harold N., Uauy, Cristobal, Akhunov, Eduard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30136108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3166-7
_version_ 1783366814402609152
author Wang, Wei
Simmonds, James
Pan, Qianli
Davidson, Dwight
He, Fei
Battal, Abdulhamit
Akhunova, Alina
Trick, Harold N.
Uauy, Cristobal
Akhunov, Eduard
author_facet Wang, Wei
Simmonds, James
Pan, Qianli
Davidson, Dwight
He, Fei
Battal, Abdulhamit
Akhunova, Alina
Trick, Harold N.
Uauy, Cristobal
Akhunov, Eduard
author_sort Wang, Wei
collection PubMed
description KEY MESSAGE: CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing and EMS mutagenesis revealed inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of TaGW2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat. ABSTRACT: The TaGW2 gene homoeologues have been reported to be negative regulators of grain size (GS) and thousand grain weight (TGW) in wheat. However, the contribution of each homoeologue to trait variation among different wheat cultivars is not well documented. We used the CRISPR-Cas9 system and TILLING to mutagenize each homoeologous gene copy in cultivars Bobwhite and Paragon, respectively. Plants carrying single-copy nonsense mutations in different genomes showed different levels of GS/TGW increase, with TGW increasing by an average of 5.5% (edited lines) and 5.3% (TILLING mutants). In any combination, the double homoeologue mutants showed higher phenotypic effects than the respective single-genome mutants. The double mutants had on average 12.1% (edited) and 10.5% (TILLING) higher TGW with respect to wild-type lines. The highest increase in GS and TGW was shown for triple mutants of both cultivars, with increases in 16.3% (edited) and 20.7% (TILLING) in TGW. The additive effects of the TaGW2 homoeologues were also demonstrated by the negative correlation between the functional gene copy number and GS/TGW in Bobwhite mutants and an F(2) population. The highest single-genome increases in GS and TGW in Paragon and Bobwhite were obtained by mutations in the B and D genomes, respectively. These inter-cultivar differences in the phenotypic effects between the TaGW2 gene homoeologues coincide with inter-cultivar differences in the homoeologue expression levels. These results indicate that GS/TGW variation in wheat can be modulated by the dosage of homoeologous genes with inter-cultivar differences in the magnitude of the individual homoeologue effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00122-018-3166-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6208945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62089452018-11-09 Gene editing and mutagenesis reveal inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of TaGW2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat Wang, Wei Simmonds, James Pan, Qianli Davidson, Dwight He, Fei Battal, Abdulhamit Akhunova, Alina Trick, Harold N. Uauy, Cristobal Akhunov, Eduard Theor Appl Genet Original Article KEY MESSAGE: CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing and EMS mutagenesis revealed inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of TaGW2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat. ABSTRACT: The TaGW2 gene homoeologues have been reported to be negative regulators of grain size (GS) and thousand grain weight (TGW) in wheat. However, the contribution of each homoeologue to trait variation among different wheat cultivars is not well documented. We used the CRISPR-Cas9 system and TILLING to mutagenize each homoeologous gene copy in cultivars Bobwhite and Paragon, respectively. Plants carrying single-copy nonsense mutations in different genomes showed different levels of GS/TGW increase, with TGW increasing by an average of 5.5% (edited lines) and 5.3% (TILLING mutants). In any combination, the double homoeologue mutants showed higher phenotypic effects than the respective single-genome mutants. The double mutants had on average 12.1% (edited) and 10.5% (TILLING) higher TGW with respect to wild-type lines. The highest increase in GS and TGW was shown for triple mutants of both cultivars, with increases in 16.3% (edited) and 20.7% (TILLING) in TGW. The additive effects of the TaGW2 homoeologues were also demonstrated by the negative correlation between the functional gene copy number and GS/TGW in Bobwhite mutants and an F(2) population. The highest single-genome increases in GS and TGW in Paragon and Bobwhite were obtained by mutations in the B and D genomes, respectively. These inter-cultivar differences in the phenotypic effects between the TaGW2 gene homoeologues coincide with inter-cultivar differences in the homoeologue expression levels. These results indicate that GS/TGW variation in wheat can be modulated by the dosage of homoeologous genes with inter-cultivar differences in the magnitude of the individual homoeologue effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00122-018-3166-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-08-22 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6208945/ /pubmed/30136108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3166-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wang, Wei
Simmonds, James
Pan, Qianli
Davidson, Dwight
He, Fei
Battal, Abdulhamit
Akhunova, Alina
Trick, Harold N.
Uauy, Cristobal
Akhunov, Eduard
Gene editing and mutagenesis reveal inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of TaGW2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat
title Gene editing and mutagenesis reveal inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of TaGW2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat
title_full Gene editing and mutagenesis reveal inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of TaGW2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat
title_fullStr Gene editing and mutagenesis reveal inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of TaGW2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat
title_full_unstemmed Gene editing and mutagenesis reveal inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of TaGW2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat
title_short Gene editing and mutagenesis reveal inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of TaGW2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat
title_sort gene editing and mutagenesis reveal inter-cultivar differences and additivity in the contribution of tagw2 homoeologues to grain size and weight in wheat
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30136108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3166-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wangwei geneeditingandmutagenesisrevealintercultivardifferencesandadditivityinthecontributionoftagw2homoeologuestograinsizeandweightinwheat
AT simmondsjames geneeditingandmutagenesisrevealintercultivardifferencesandadditivityinthecontributionoftagw2homoeologuestograinsizeandweightinwheat
AT panqianli geneeditingandmutagenesisrevealintercultivardifferencesandadditivityinthecontributionoftagw2homoeologuestograinsizeandweightinwheat
AT davidsondwight geneeditingandmutagenesisrevealintercultivardifferencesandadditivityinthecontributionoftagw2homoeologuestograinsizeandweightinwheat
AT hefei geneeditingandmutagenesisrevealintercultivardifferencesandadditivityinthecontributionoftagw2homoeologuestograinsizeandweightinwheat
AT battalabdulhamit geneeditingandmutagenesisrevealintercultivardifferencesandadditivityinthecontributionoftagw2homoeologuestograinsizeandweightinwheat
AT akhunovaalina geneeditingandmutagenesisrevealintercultivardifferencesandadditivityinthecontributionoftagw2homoeologuestograinsizeandweightinwheat
AT trickharoldn geneeditingandmutagenesisrevealintercultivardifferencesandadditivityinthecontributionoftagw2homoeologuestograinsizeandweightinwheat
AT uauycristobal geneeditingandmutagenesisrevealintercultivardifferencesandadditivityinthecontributionoftagw2homoeologuestograinsizeandweightinwheat
AT akhunoveduard geneeditingandmutagenesisrevealintercultivardifferencesandadditivityinthecontributionoftagw2homoeologuestograinsizeandweightinwheat