Cargando…

Which one is more effective for the treatment of very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: PVP or PKP?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of the elderly with very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (vsOVCFs). METHODS: From September 2012 to Septembe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Feng, Wang, Lin-Feng, Miao, De-Chao, Dong, Zhen, Shen, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464581
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S179022
_version_ 1783366843084308480
author Wang, Feng
Wang, Lin-Feng
Miao, De-Chao
Dong, Zhen
Shen, Yong
author_facet Wang, Feng
Wang, Lin-Feng
Miao, De-Chao
Dong, Zhen
Shen, Yong
author_sort Wang, Feng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of the elderly with very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (vsOVCFs). METHODS: From September 2012 to September 2015, 57 patients with vsOVCFs who had undergone PVP and PKP surgeries at our medical center were reviewed retrospectively, at least 2 years follow-up. All patients were divided into PVP group (n=31) and PKP group (n=26). Clinical data including clinical and radiological evaluation results were performed pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: The operation time of PVP group (29.6±3.3 minutes) was less than that of PKP group (37.4±4.2 minutes), with significant differences (P<0.05). Compared with preoperative data, the VAS scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and local kyphotic angle were improved with significant differences at 1 day after surgery and the last follow-up in two groups (P<0.05). However, there were no differences in VAS and ODI scores between the two groups (P>0.05). The local kyphotic angle of PVP group was more than that of PKP group after surgery, with significant differences (P<0.05). At 1 day after surgery and the last follow-up, the anterior height of vertebrae fractured was significantly improved compared with preoperative in PKP group (P<0.05), and there was no statistical difference compared with preoperative in PVP group (P>0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the leakage rate of bone cement (P>0.05) and incidence of adjacent-level vertebra fracture (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Both PVP and PKP can significantly relieve the pain of the patients with vsOVCFs. Restoring the vertebral height and local kyphotic angle corrections of PKP are comparatively better than those of PVP. However, the operation time of PKP is significantly longer than that of PVP and PKP is not superior in the leakage rate of bone cement and incidence of adjacent-level vertebra fracture compared to PVP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6209074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62090742018-11-21 Which one is more effective for the treatment of very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: PVP or PKP? Wang, Feng Wang, Lin-Feng Miao, De-Chao Dong, Zhen Shen, Yong J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of the elderly with very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (vsOVCFs). METHODS: From September 2012 to September 2015, 57 patients with vsOVCFs who had undergone PVP and PKP surgeries at our medical center were reviewed retrospectively, at least 2 years follow-up. All patients were divided into PVP group (n=31) and PKP group (n=26). Clinical data including clinical and radiological evaluation results were performed pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: The operation time of PVP group (29.6±3.3 minutes) was less than that of PKP group (37.4±4.2 minutes), with significant differences (P<0.05). Compared with preoperative data, the VAS scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and local kyphotic angle were improved with significant differences at 1 day after surgery and the last follow-up in two groups (P<0.05). However, there were no differences in VAS and ODI scores between the two groups (P>0.05). The local kyphotic angle of PVP group was more than that of PKP group after surgery, with significant differences (P<0.05). At 1 day after surgery and the last follow-up, the anterior height of vertebrae fractured was significantly improved compared with preoperative in PKP group (P<0.05), and there was no statistical difference compared with preoperative in PVP group (P>0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the leakage rate of bone cement (P>0.05) and incidence of adjacent-level vertebra fracture (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Both PVP and PKP can significantly relieve the pain of the patients with vsOVCFs. Restoring the vertebral height and local kyphotic angle corrections of PKP are comparatively better than those of PVP. However, the operation time of PKP is significantly longer than that of PVP and PKP is not superior in the leakage rate of bone cement and incidence of adjacent-level vertebra fracture compared to PVP. Dove Medical Press 2018-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6209074/ /pubmed/30464581 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S179022 Text en © 2018 Wang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wang, Feng
Wang, Lin-Feng
Miao, De-Chao
Dong, Zhen
Shen, Yong
Which one is more effective for the treatment of very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: PVP or PKP?
title Which one is more effective for the treatment of very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: PVP or PKP?
title_full Which one is more effective for the treatment of very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: PVP or PKP?
title_fullStr Which one is more effective for the treatment of very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: PVP or PKP?
title_full_unstemmed Which one is more effective for the treatment of very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: PVP or PKP?
title_short Which one is more effective for the treatment of very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: PVP or PKP?
title_sort which one is more effective for the treatment of very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: pvp or pkp?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464581
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S179022
work_keys_str_mv AT wangfeng whichoneismoreeffectiveforthetreatmentofverysevereosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturespvporpkp
AT wanglinfeng whichoneismoreeffectiveforthetreatmentofverysevereosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturespvporpkp
AT miaodechao whichoneismoreeffectiveforthetreatmentofverysevereosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturespvporpkp
AT dongzhen whichoneismoreeffectiveforthetreatmentofverysevereosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturespvporpkp
AT shenyong whichoneismoreeffectiveforthetreatmentofverysevereosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturespvporpkp