Cargando…

Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics

The study of animal behavior, especially regarding welfare, needs the development of tools to identify, quantify and compare animal postures with interobserver reliability. While most studies subjectively describe animal postures, or quantify only limited parts of the body, the usage of geometric mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sénèque, Emilie, Morisset, Stéphane, Lesimple, Clémence, Hausberger, Martine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30379841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204208
_version_ 1783366847930826752
author Sénèque, Emilie
Morisset, Stéphane
Lesimple, Clémence
Hausberger, Martine
author_facet Sénèque, Emilie
Morisset, Stéphane
Lesimple, Clémence
Hausberger, Martine
author_sort Sénèque, Emilie
collection PubMed
description The study of animal behavior, especially regarding welfare, needs the development of tools to identify, quantify and compare animal postures with interobserver reliability. While most studies subjectively describe animal postures, or quantify only limited parts of the body, the usage of geometric morphometrics has allowed for the description of horses’ and pigs’ upper body outline and the comparison of postures from different populations thanks to robust statistical analysis. We have attempted here to optimize the geometric morphometrics (GM) method already used in horses by introducing the outline analysis with sliding semilandmarks (SSL), by eliminating the balance movement of the neck and by focusing only on parts of the upper line. For this purpose, photographs of 85 horses from 11 riding schools, known for differing in terms of housing and working conditions, were analyzed with previous and new GM methods and these results were compared with each other. Using SSL and eliminating the neck movement appeared to better discriminate the horse populations than the previous GM method. Study of parts of the dorsum proved efficient too. This new methodology should now be used to examine if posture could be an indicator of horse welfare state, and similar studies should be performed in other species in order to validate the same methodology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6209139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62091392018-11-19 Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics Sénèque, Emilie Morisset, Stéphane Lesimple, Clémence Hausberger, Martine PLoS One Research Article The study of animal behavior, especially regarding welfare, needs the development of tools to identify, quantify and compare animal postures with interobserver reliability. While most studies subjectively describe animal postures, or quantify only limited parts of the body, the usage of geometric morphometrics has allowed for the description of horses’ and pigs’ upper body outline and the comparison of postures from different populations thanks to robust statistical analysis. We have attempted here to optimize the geometric morphometrics (GM) method already used in horses by introducing the outline analysis with sliding semilandmarks (SSL), by eliminating the balance movement of the neck and by focusing only on parts of the upper line. For this purpose, photographs of 85 horses from 11 riding schools, known for differing in terms of housing and working conditions, were analyzed with previous and new GM methods and these results were compared with each other. Using SSL and eliminating the neck movement appeared to better discriminate the horse populations than the previous GM method. Study of parts of the dorsum proved efficient too. This new methodology should now be used to examine if posture could be an indicator of horse welfare state, and similar studies should be performed in other species in order to validate the same methodology. Public Library of Science 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6209139/ /pubmed/30379841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204208 Text en © 2018 Sénèque et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sénèque, Emilie
Morisset, Stéphane
Lesimple, Clémence
Hausberger, Martine
Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics
title Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics
title_full Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics
title_fullStr Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics
title_full_unstemmed Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics
title_short Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics
title_sort testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30379841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204208
work_keys_str_mv AT senequeemilie testingoptimalmethodstocomparehorseposturesusinggeometricmorphometrics
AT morissetstephane testingoptimalmethodstocomparehorseposturesusinggeometricmorphometrics
AT lesimpleclemence testingoptimalmethodstocomparehorseposturesusinggeometricmorphometrics
AT hausbergermartine testingoptimalmethodstocomparehorseposturesusinggeometricmorphometrics