Cargando…

Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the amount of EEG suppression achieved in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) patients treated with pharmacologically-induced coma (PIC). METHODS: We analyzed EEG recordings from 35 RSE patients between 21–84 years-old who received PIC that target burst suppression and qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Jingzhi, Jonnalagadda, Durga, Moura, Valdery, Purdon, Patrick L., Brown, Emery N., Westover, M. Brandon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30379935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205789
_version_ 1783366865076092928
author An, Jingzhi
Jonnalagadda, Durga
Moura, Valdery
Purdon, Patrick L.
Brown, Emery N.
Westover, M. Brandon
author_facet An, Jingzhi
Jonnalagadda, Durga
Moura, Valdery
Purdon, Patrick L.
Brown, Emery N.
Westover, M. Brandon
author_sort An, Jingzhi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To characterize the amount of EEG suppression achieved in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) patients treated with pharmacologically-induced coma (PIC). METHODS: We analyzed EEG recordings from 35 RSE patients between 21–84 years-old who received PIC that target burst suppression and quantified the amount of EEG suppression using the burst suppression probability (BSP). Then we measured the variability of BSPs with respect to a reference level of BSP 0.8 ± 0.15. Finally, we also measured the variability of BSPs with respect to the amount of intravenous anesthetic drugs (IVADs) received by the patients. RESULTS: Patients remained in the reference BSP range for only 8% (median, interquartile range IQR [0, 29] %) of the total time under treatment. The median time with BSP below the reference range was 84% (IQR [37, 100] %). BSPs in some patients drifted significantly over time despite constant infusion rates of IVADs. Similar weight-normalized infusion rates of IVADs in different patients nearly always resulted in distinct BSPs (probability 0.93 (IQR [0.82, 1.0]). CONCLUSION: This study quantitatively identified high variability in the amount of EEG suppression achieved in clinical practice when treating RSE patients. While some of this variability may arise from clinicians purposefully deviating from clinical practice guidelines, our results show that the high variability also arises in part from significant inter- and intra- individual pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variation. Our results indicate that the delicate balance between maintaining sufficient EEG suppression in RSE patients and minimizing IVAD exposure in clinical practice is challenging to achieve. This may affect patient outcomes and confound studies seeking to determine an optimal amount of EEG suppression for treatment of RSE. Therefore, our analysis points to the need for developing an alternative paradigm, such as vigilant anesthetic management as happens in operating rooms, or closed-loop anesthesia delivery, for investigating and providing induced-coma therapy to RSE patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6209214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62092142018-11-19 Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus An, Jingzhi Jonnalagadda, Durga Moura, Valdery Purdon, Patrick L. Brown, Emery N. Westover, M. Brandon PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To characterize the amount of EEG suppression achieved in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) patients treated with pharmacologically-induced coma (PIC). METHODS: We analyzed EEG recordings from 35 RSE patients between 21–84 years-old who received PIC that target burst suppression and quantified the amount of EEG suppression using the burst suppression probability (BSP). Then we measured the variability of BSPs with respect to a reference level of BSP 0.8 ± 0.15. Finally, we also measured the variability of BSPs with respect to the amount of intravenous anesthetic drugs (IVADs) received by the patients. RESULTS: Patients remained in the reference BSP range for only 8% (median, interquartile range IQR [0, 29] %) of the total time under treatment. The median time with BSP below the reference range was 84% (IQR [37, 100] %). BSPs in some patients drifted significantly over time despite constant infusion rates of IVADs. Similar weight-normalized infusion rates of IVADs in different patients nearly always resulted in distinct BSPs (probability 0.93 (IQR [0.82, 1.0]). CONCLUSION: This study quantitatively identified high variability in the amount of EEG suppression achieved in clinical practice when treating RSE patients. While some of this variability may arise from clinicians purposefully deviating from clinical practice guidelines, our results show that the high variability also arises in part from significant inter- and intra- individual pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variation. Our results indicate that the delicate balance between maintaining sufficient EEG suppression in RSE patients and minimizing IVAD exposure in clinical practice is challenging to achieve. This may affect patient outcomes and confound studies seeking to determine an optimal amount of EEG suppression for treatment of RSE. Therefore, our analysis points to the need for developing an alternative paradigm, such as vigilant anesthetic management as happens in operating rooms, or closed-loop anesthesia delivery, for investigating and providing induced-coma therapy to RSE patients. Public Library of Science 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6209214/ /pubmed/30379935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205789 Text en © 2018 An et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
An, Jingzhi
Jonnalagadda, Durga
Moura, Valdery
Purdon, Patrick L.
Brown, Emery N.
Westover, M. Brandon
Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title_full Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title_fullStr Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title_full_unstemmed Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title_short Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title_sort variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30379935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205789
work_keys_str_mv AT anjingzhi variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT jonnalagaddadurga variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT mouravaldery variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT purdonpatrickl variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT brownemeryn variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT westovermbrandon variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus