Cargando…
Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the amount of EEG suppression achieved in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) patients treated with pharmacologically-induced coma (PIC). METHODS: We analyzed EEG recordings from 35 RSE patients between 21–84 years-old who received PIC that target burst suppression and qua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30379935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205789 |
_version_ | 1783366865076092928 |
---|---|
author | An, Jingzhi Jonnalagadda, Durga Moura, Valdery Purdon, Patrick L. Brown, Emery N. Westover, M. Brandon |
author_facet | An, Jingzhi Jonnalagadda, Durga Moura, Valdery Purdon, Patrick L. Brown, Emery N. Westover, M. Brandon |
author_sort | An, Jingzhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To characterize the amount of EEG suppression achieved in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) patients treated with pharmacologically-induced coma (PIC). METHODS: We analyzed EEG recordings from 35 RSE patients between 21–84 years-old who received PIC that target burst suppression and quantified the amount of EEG suppression using the burst suppression probability (BSP). Then we measured the variability of BSPs with respect to a reference level of BSP 0.8 ± 0.15. Finally, we also measured the variability of BSPs with respect to the amount of intravenous anesthetic drugs (IVADs) received by the patients. RESULTS: Patients remained in the reference BSP range for only 8% (median, interquartile range IQR [0, 29] %) of the total time under treatment. The median time with BSP below the reference range was 84% (IQR [37, 100] %). BSPs in some patients drifted significantly over time despite constant infusion rates of IVADs. Similar weight-normalized infusion rates of IVADs in different patients nearly always resulted in distinct BSPs (probability 0.93 (IQR [0.82, 1.0]). CONCLUSION: This study quantitatively identified high variability in the amount of EEG suppression achieved in clinical practice when treating RSE patients. While some of this variability may arise from clinicians purposefully deviating from clinical practice guidelines, our results show that the high variability also arises in part from significant inter- and intra- individual pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variation. Our results indicate that the delicate balance between maintaining sufficient EEG suppression in RSE patients and minimizing IVAD exposure in clinical practice is challenging to achieve. This may affect patient outcomes and confound studies seeking to determine an optimal amount of EEG suppression for treatment of RSE. Therefore, our analysis points to the need for developing an alternative paradigm, such as vigilant anesthetic management as happens in operating rooms, or closed-loop anesthesia delivery, for investigating and providing induced-coma therapy to RSE patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6209214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62092142018-11-19 Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus An, Jingzhi Jonnalagadda, Durga Moura, Valdery Purdon, Patrick L. Brown, Emery N. Westover, M. Brandon PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To characterize the amount of EEG suppression achieved in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) patients treated with pharmacologically-induced coma (PIC). METHODS: We analyzed EEG recordings from 35 RSE patients between 21–84 years-old who received PIC that target burst suppression and quantified the amount of EEG suppression using the burst suppression probability (BSP). Then we measured the variability of BSPs with respect to a reference level of BSP 0.8 ± 0.15. Finally, we also measured the variability of BSPs with respect to the amount of intravenous anesthetic drugs (IVADs) received by the patients. RESULTS: Patients remained in the reference BSP range for only 8% (median, interquartile range IQR [0, 29] %) of the total time under treatment. The median time with BSP below the reference range was 84% (IQR [37, 100] %). BSPs in some patients drifted significantly over time despite constant infusion rates of IVADs. Similar weight-normalized infusion rates of IVADs in different patients nearly always resulted in distinct BSPs (probability 0.93 (IQR [0.82, 1.0]). CONCLUSION: This study quantitatively identified high variability in the amount of EEG suppression achieved in clinical practice when treating RSE patients. While some of this variability may arise from clinicians purposefully deviating from clinical practice guidelines, our results show that the high variability also arises in part from significant inter- and intra- individual pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variation. Our results indicate that the delicate balance between maintaining sufficient EEG suppression in RSE patients and minimizing IVAD exposure in clinical practice is challenging to achieve. This may affect patient outcomes and confound studies seeking to determine an optimal amount of EEG suppression for treatment of RSE. Therefore, our analysis points to the need for developing an alternative paradigm, such as vigilant anesthetic management as happens in operating rooms, or closed-loop anesthesia delivery, for investigating and providing induced-coma therapy to RSE patients. Public Library of Science 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6209214/ /pubmed/30379935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205789 Text en © 2018 An et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article An, Jingzhi Jonnalagadda, Durga Moura, Valdery Purdon, Patrick L. Brown, Emery N. Westover, M. Brandon Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus |
title | Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus |
title_full | Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus |
title_fullStr | Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus |
title_full_unstemmed | Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus |
title_short | Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus |
title_sort | variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30379935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205789 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anjingzhi variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus AT jonnalagaddadurga variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus AT mouravaldery variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus AT purdonpatrickl variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus AT brownemeryn variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus AT westovermbrandon variabilityinpharmacologicallyinducedcomafortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus |