Cargando…

A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures

3D bioprinting holds great promise in the field of regenerative medicine as it can create complex structures in a layer-by-layer manner using cell-laden bioinks, making it possible to imitate native tissues. Current bioinks lack both high printability and biocompatibility required in this respect. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anil Kumar, Shweta, Tasnim, Nishat, Dominguez, Erick, Allen, Shane, Suggs, Laura J., Ito, Yoshihiro, Joddar, Binata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels4030073
_version_ 1783366873065193472
author Anil Kumar, Shweta
Tasnim, Nishat
Dominguez, Erick
Allen, Shane
Suggs, Laura J.
Ito, Yoshihiro
Joddar, Binata
author_facet Anil Kumar, Shweta
Tasnim, Nishat
Dominguez, Erick
Allen, Shane
Suggs, Laura J.
Ito, Yoshihiro
Joddar, Binata
author_sort Anil Kumar, Shweta
collection PubMed
description 3D bioprinting holds great promise in the field of regenerative medicine as it can create complex structures in a layer-by-layer manner using cell-laden bioinks, making it possible to imitate native tissues. Current bioinks lack both high printability and biocompatibility required in this respect. Hence, the development of bioinks that exhibit both properties is needed. In our previous study, a furfuryl-gelatin-based bioink, crosslinkable by visible light, was used for creating mouse mesenchymal stem cell-laden structures with a high fidelity. In this study, lattice mesh geometries were printed in a comparative study to test against the properties of a traditional rectangular-sheet. After 3D printing and crosslinking, both structures were analysed for swelling and rheological properties, and their porosity was estimated using scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that the lattice structure was relatively more porous with enhanced rheological properties and exhibited a lower degradation rate compared to the rectangular-sheet. Further, the lattice allowed cells to proliferate to a greater extent compared to the rectangular-sheet, which initially retained a lower number of cells. All of these results collectively affirmed that the lattice poses as a superior scaffold design for tissue engineering applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6209247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62092472019-01-17 A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures Anil Kumar, Shweta Tasnim, Nishat Dominguez, Erick Allen, Shane Suggs, Laura J. Ito, Yoshihiro Joddar, Binata Gels Article 3D bioprinting holds great promise in the field of regenerative medicine as it can create complex structures in a layer-by-layer manner using cell-laden bioinks, making it possible to imitate native tissues. Current bioinks lack both high printability and biocompatibility required in this respect. Hence, the development of bioinks that exhibit both properties is needed. In our previous study, a furfuryl-gelatin-based bioink, crosslinkable by visible light, was used for creating mouse mesenchymal stem cell-laden structures with a high fidelity. In this study, lattice mesh geometries were printed in a comparative study to test against the properties of a traditional rectangular-sheet. After 3D printing and crosslinking, both structures were analysed for swelling and rheological properties, and their porosity was estimated using scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that the lattice structure was relatively more porous with enhanced rheological properties and exhibited a lower degradation rate compared to the rectangular-sheet. Further, the lattice allowed cells to proliferate to a greater extent compared to the rectangular-sheet, which initially retained a lower number of cells. All of these results collectively affirmed that the lattice poses as a superior scaffold design for tissue engineering applications. MDPI 2018-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6209247/ /pubmed/30674849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels4030073 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Anil Kumar, Shweta
Tasnim, Nishat
Dominguez, Erick
Allen, Shane
Suggs, Laura J.
Ito, Yoshihiro
Joddar, Binata
A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures
title A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures
title_full A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures
title_short A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures
title_sort comparative study of a 3d bioprinted gelatin-based lattice and rectangular-sheet structures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels4030073
work_keys_str_mv AT anilkumarshweta acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT tasnimnishat acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT dominguezerick acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT allenshane acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT suggslauraj acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT itoyoshihiro acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT joddarbinata acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT anilkumarshweta comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT tasnimnishat comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT dominguezerick comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT allenshane comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT suggslauraj comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT itoyoshihiro comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures
AT joddarbinata comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures