Cargando…
A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures
3D bioprinting holds great promise in the field of regenerative medicine as it can create complex structures in a layer-by-layer manner using cell-laden bioinks, making it possible to imitate native tissues. Current bioinks lack both high printability and biocompatibility required in this respect. H...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels4030073 |
_version_ | 1783366873065193472 |
---|---|
author | Anil Kumar, Shweta Tasnim, Nishat Dominguez, Erick Allen, Shane Suggs, Laura J. Ito, Yoshihiro Joddar, Binata |
author_facet | Anil Kumar, Shweta Tasnim, Nishat Dominguez, Erick Allen, Shane Suggs, Laura J. Ito, Yoshihiro Joddar, Binata |
author_sort | Anil Kumar, Shweta |
collection | PubMed |
description | 3D bioprinting holds great promise in the field of regenerative medicine as it can create complex structures in a layer-by-layer manner using cell-laden bioinks, making it possible to imitate native tissues. Current bioinks lack both high printability and biocompatibility required in this respect. Hence, the development of bioinks that exhibit both properties is needed. In our previous study, a furfuryl-gelatin-based bioink, crosslinkable by visible light, was used for creating mouse mesenchymal stem cell-laden structures with a high fidelity. In this study, lattice mesh geometries were printed in a comparative study to test against the properties of a traditional rectangular-sheet. After 3D printing and crosslinking, both structures were analysed for swelling and rheological properties, and their porosity was estimated using scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that the lattice structure was relatively more porous with enhanced rheological properties and exhibited a lower degradation rate compared to the rectangular-sheet. Further, the lattice allowed cells to proliferate to a greater extent compared to the rectangular-sheet, which initially retained a lower number of cells. All of these results collectively affirmed that the lattice poses as a superior scaffold design for tissue engineering applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6209247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62092472019-01-17 A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures Anil Kumar, Shweta Tasnim, Nishat Dominguez, Erick Allen, Shane Suggs, Laura J. Ito, Yoshihiro Joddar, Binata Gels Article 3D bioprinting holds great promise in the field of regenerative medicine as it can create complex structures in a layer-by-layer manner using cell-laden bioinks, making it possible to imitate native tissues. Current bioinks lack both high printability and biocompatibility required in this respect. Hence, the development of bioinks that exhibit both properties is needed. In our previous study, a furfuryl-gelatin-based bioink, crosslinkable by visible light, was used for creating mouse mesenchymal stem cell-laden structures with a high fidelity. In this study, lattice mesh geometries were printed in a comparative study to test against the properties of a traditional rectangular-sheet. After 3D printing and crosslinking, both structures were analysed for swelling and rheological properties, and their porosity was estimated using scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that the lattice structure was relatively more porous with enhanced rheological properties and exhibited a lower degradation rate compared to the rectangular-sheet. Further, the lattice allowed cells to proliferate to a greater extent compared to the rectangular-sheet, which initially retained a lower number of cells. All of these results collectively affirmed that the lattice poses as a superior scaffold design for tissue engineering applications. MDPI 2018-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6209247/ /pubmed/30674849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels4030073 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Anil Kumar, Shweta Tasnim, Nishat Dominguez, Erick Allen, Shane Suggs, Laura J. Ito, Yoshihiro Joddar, Binata A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures |
title | A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures |
title_full | A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures |
title_short | A Comparative Study of a 3D Bioprinted Gelatin-Based Lattice and Rectangular-Sheet Structures |
title_sort | comparative study of a 3d bioprinted gelatin-based lattice and rectangular-sheet structures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels4030073 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anilkumarshweta acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT tasnimnishat acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT dominguezerick acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT allenshane acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT suggslauraj acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT itoyoshihiro acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT joddarbinata acomparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT anilkumarshweta comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT tasnimnishat comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT dominguezerick comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT allenshane comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT suggslauraj comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT itoyoshihiro comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures AT joddarbinata comparativestudyofa3dbioprintedgelatinbasedlatticeandrectangularsheetstructures |