Cargando…

Evolution of Bacterial Gene Transfer Agents

Bacterial gene transfer agents (GTAs) are small virus-like particles that package DNA fragments and inject them into cells. They are encoded by gene clusters resembling defective prophages, with genes for capsid head and tail components. These gene clusters are usually assumed to be maintained by se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Redfield, Rosemary J., Soucy, Shannon M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02527
_version_ 1783366941940908032
author Redfield, Rosemary J.
Soucy, Shannon M.
author_facet Redfield, Rosemary J.
Soucy, Shannon M.
author_sort Redfield, Rosemary J.
collection PubMed
description Bacterial gene transfer agents (GTAs) are small virus-like particles that package DNA fragments and inject them into cells. They are encoded by gene clusters resembling defective prophages, with genes for capsid head and tail components. These gene clusters are usually assumed to be maintained by selection for the benefits of GTA-mediated recombination, but this has never been tested. We rigorously examined the potential benefits of GTA-mediated recombination, considering separately transmission of GTA-encoding genes and recombination of all chromosomal genes. In principle GTA genes could be directly maintained if GTA particles spread them to GTA(-) cells often enough to compensate for the loss of GTA-producing cells. However, careful bookkeeping showed that losses inevitably exceed gains for two reasons. First, cells must lyse to release particles to the environment. Second, GTA genes are not preferentially replicated before DNA is packaged. A simulation model was then used to search for conditions where recombination of chromosomal genes makes GTA(+) populations fitter than GTA(-) populations. Although the model showed that both synergistic epistasis and some modes of regulation could generate fitness benefits large enough to overcome the cost of lysis, these benefits neither allowed GTA(+) cells to invade GTA(-) populations, nor allowed GTA(+) populations to resist invasion by GTA(-) cells. Importantly, the benefits depended on highly improbable assumptions about the efficiencies of GTA production and recombination. Thus, the selective benefits that maintain GTA gene clusters over many millions of years must arise from consequences other than transfer of GTA genes or recombination of chromosomal genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6209664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62096642018-11-08 Evolution of Bacterial Gene Transfer Agents Redfield, Rosemary J. Soucy, Shannon M. Front Microbiol Microbiology Bacterial gene transfer agents (GTAs) are small virus-like particles that package DNA fragments and inject them into cells. They are encoded by gene clusters resembling defective prophages, with genes for capsid head and tail components. These gene clusters are usually assumed to be maintained by selection for the benefits of GTA-mediated recombination, but this has never been tested. We rigorously examined the potential benefits of GTA-mediated recombination, considering separately transmission of GTA-encoding genes and recombination of all chromosomal genes. In principle GTA genes could be directly maintained if GTA particles spread them to GTA(-) cells often enough to compensate for the loss of GTA-producing cells. However, careful bookkeeping showed that losses inevitably exceed gains for two reasons. First, cells must lyse to release particles to the environment. Second, GTA genes are not preferentially replicated before DNA is packaged. A simulation model was then used to search for conditions where recombination of chromosomal genes makes GTA(+) populations fitter than GTA(-) populations. Although the model showed that both synergistic epistasis and some modes of regulation could generate fitness benefits large enough to overcome the cost of lysis, these benefits neither allowed GTA(+) cells to invade GTA(-) populations, nor allowed GTA(+) populations to resist invasion by GTA(-) cells. Importantly, the benefits depended on highly improbable assumptions about the efficiencies of GTA production and recombination. Thus, the selective benefits that maintain GTA gene clusters over many millions of years must arise from consequences other than transfer of GTA genes or recombination of chromosomal genes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6209664/ /pubmed/30410473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02527 Text en Copyright © 2018 Redfield and Soucy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Redfield, Rosemary J.
Soucy, Shannon M.
Evolution of Bacterial Gene Transfer Agents
title Evolution of Bacterial Gene Transfer Agents
title_full Evolution of Bacterial Gene Transfer Agents
title_fullStr Evolution of Bacterial Gene Transfer Agents
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of Bacterial Gene Transfer Agents
title_short Evolution of Bacterial Gene Transfer Agents
title_sort evolution of bacterial gene transfer agents
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02527
work_keys_str_mv AT redfieldrosemaryj evolutionofbacterialgenetransferagents
AT soucyshannonm evolutionofbacterialgenetransferagents