Cargando…

Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review

Background: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD) occurs as a result of numerous agents, but the risk often only becomes apparent after the marketing authorisation of such agents. Methods: In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review, we aimed to evaluate and synthesise the current literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skeoch, Sarah, Weatherley, Nicholas, Swift, Andrew J., Oldroyd, Alexander, Johns, Christopher, Hayton, Conal, Giollo, Alessandro, Wild, James M., Waterton, John C., Buch, Maya, Linton, Kim, Bruce, Ian N., Leonard, Colm, Bianchi, Stephen, Chaudhuri, Nazia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100356
_version_ 1783366987474272256
author Skeoch, Sarah
Weatherley, Nicholas
Swift, Andrew J.
Oldroyd, Alexander
Johns, Christopher
Hayton, Conal
Giollo, Alessandro
Wild, James M.
Waterton, John C.
Buch, Maya
Linton, Kim
Bruce, Ian N.
Leonard, Colm
Bianchi, Stephen
Chaudhuri, Nazia
author_facet Skeoch, Sarah
Weatherley, Nicholas
Swift, Andrew J.
Oldroyd, Alexander
Johns, Christopher
Hayton, Conal
Giollo, Alessandro
Wild, James M.
Waterton, John C.
Buch, Maya
Linton, Kim
Bruce, Ian N.
Leonard, Colm
Bianchi, Stephen
Chaudhuri, Nazia
author_sort Skeoch, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Background: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD) occurs as a result of numerous agents, but the risk often only becomes apparent after the marketing authorisation of such agents. Methods: In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review, we aimed to evaluate and synthesise the current literature on DIILD. Results: Following a quality assessment, 156 full-text papers describing more than 6000 DIILD cases were included in the review. However, the majority of the papers were of low or very low quality in relation to the review question (78%). Thus, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis, and descriptive review was undertaken instead. DIILD incidence rates varied between 4.1 and 12.4 cases/million/year. DIILD accounted for 3–5% of prevalent ILD cases. Cancer drugs, followed by rheumatology drugs, amiodarone and antibiotics, were the most common causes of DIILD. The radiopathological phenotype of DIILD varied between and within agents, and no typical radiological pattern specific to DIILD was identified. Mortality rates of over 50% were reported in some studies. Severity at presentation was the most reliable predictor of mortality. Glucocorticoids (GCs) were commonly used to treat DIILD, but no prospective studies examined their effect on outcome. Conclusions: Overall high-quality evidence in DIILD is lacking, and the current review will inform larger prospective studies to investigate the diagnosis and management of DIILD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6209877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62098772018-11-02 Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review Skeoch, Sarah Weatherley, Nicholas Swift, Andrew J. Oldroyd, Alexander Johns, Christopher Hayton, Conal Giollo, Alessandro Wild, James M. Waterton, John C. Buch, Maya Linton, Kim Bruce, Ian N. Leonard, Colm Bianchi, Stephen Chaudhuri, Nazia J Clin Med Review Background: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD) occurs as a result of numerous agents, but the risk often only becomes apparent after the marketing authorisation of such agents. Methods: In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review, we aimed to evaluate and synthesise the current literature on DIILD. Results: Following a quality assessment, 156 full-text papers describing more than 6000 DIILD cases were included in the review. However, the majority of the papers were of low or very low quality in relation to the review question (78%). Thus, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis, and descriptive review was undertaken instead. DIILD incidence rates varied between 4.1 and 12.4 cases/million/year. DIILD accounted for 3–5% of prevalent ILD cases. Cancer drugs, followed by rheumatology drugs, amiodarone and antibiotics, were the most common causes of DIILD. The radiopathological phenotype of DIILD varied between and within agents, and no typical radiological pattern specific to DIILD was identified. Mortality rates of over 50% were reported in some studies. Severity at presentation was the most reliable predictor of mortality. Glucocorticoids (GCs) were commonly used to treat DIILD, but no prospective studies examined their effect on outcome. Conclusions: Overall high-quality evidence in DIILD is lacking, and the current review will inform larger prospective studies to investigate the diagnosis and management of DIILD. MDPI 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6209877/ /pubmed/30326612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100356 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Skeoch, Sarah
Weatherley, Nicholas
Swift, Andrew J.
Oldroyd, Alexander
Johns, Christopher
Hayton, Conal
Giollo, Alessandro
Wild, James M.
Waterton, John C.
Buch, Maya
Linton, Kim
Bruce, Ian N.
Leonard, Colm
Bianchi, Stephen
Chaudhuri, Nazia
Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review
title Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review
title_full Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review
title_short Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review
title_sort drug-induced interstitial lung disease: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100356
work_keys_str_mv AT skeochsarah druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT weatherleynicholas druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT swiftandrewj druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT oldroydalexander druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT johnschristopher druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT haytonconal druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT giolloalessandro druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT wildjamesm druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT watertonjohnc druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT buchmaya druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT lintonkim druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT bruceiann druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT leonardcolm druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT bianchistephen druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview
AT chaudhurinazia druginducedinterstitiallungdiseaseasystematicreview