Cargando…
Clinical Implications of the NICE 2015 Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Background: In response to concerns that the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria labeled too many women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) without evidence of clinical or economic benefit, NICE recommended a change in diagnostic criteria in 2015. Ai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30360376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100376 |
_version_ | 1783367009344421888 |
---|---|
author | Bhatia, Meena Mackillop, Lucy H. Bartlett, Katy Loerup, Lise Kenworthy, Yvonne Levy, Jonathan C. Farmer, Andrew J. Velardo, Carmelo Tarassenko, Lionel Hirst, Jane E. |
author_facet | Bhatia, Meena Mackillop, Lucy H. Bartlett, Katy Loerup, Lise Kenworthy, Yvonne Levy, Jonathan C. Farmer, Andrew J. Velardo, Carmelo Tarassenko, Lionel Hirst, Jane E. |
author_sort | Bhatia, Meena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In response to concerns that the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria labeled too many women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) without evidence of clinical or economic benefit, NICE recommended a change in diagnostic criteria in 2015. Aim: To compare diabetes associated maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies complicated by GDM diagnosed using IADPSG criteria only, to those with GDM diagnosed using both IADPSG and NICE 2015 criteria. GDM screening was risk factor based. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a trial of women with GDM diagnosed by the IADPSG criteria (fasting blood glucose (BG) ≥ 5.1 mmol/L, 1 h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L and 2 h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L). Outcomes were compared for two groups: NICE + IADPSG defined as those with GDM diagnosed by both the NICE 2015 and IADPSG criteria (fasting BG ≥ 5.6 mmol/L, 2 h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L); and IADPSG-ONLY (fasting BG 5.1 mmol/L to 5.5 mmol/L, and/or 1-hour ≥10.0 mmol/L, and 2 h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L). We were not able to obtain data for women with a 2-h value between BG 7.8–8.4 mmol/L (i.e., NICE-ONLY; NICE 2015 positive and IADPSG negative). All women were treated for GDM using targets of fasting BG < 5.3 mmol/L and 1-h post prandial BG < 7.8 mmol/L respectively. Results: Of 159 women, 65 (40.9%) were NICE + IADPSG and 94 (59.1%) IADPSG-ONLY. Hypoglycaemic medication use was similar in both groups: 52.3% NICE + IADPSG, 46.8% IADPSG-ONLY, OR 1.0 (0.5–1.9). The IADPSG-ONLY group delivered later than the NICE + IADPSG group; 39.0 weeks (sd 1.4) compared to 38.2 weeks (sd 2.5), p value 0.02. Fewer caesarean sections occurred in IADPSG-ONLY group 30.9% vs. 52.3%, OR 0.4 (0.2–0.9). Birthweight, large for gestational age, and other neonatal complications were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: Gestational diabetes-associated perinatal complications were similar in both groups. The IADPSG criteria detect women with evidence of ongoing hyperglycaemia who may benefit from treatment during pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6209967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62099672018-11-02 Clinical Implications of the NICE 2015 Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Bhatia, Meena Mackillop, Lucy H. Bartlett, Katy Loerup, Lise Kenworthy, Yvonne Levy, Jonathan C. Farmer, Andrew J. Velardo, Carmelo Tarassenko, Lionel Hirst, Jane E. J Clin Med Article Background: In response to concerns that the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria labeled too many women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) without evidence of clinical or economic benefit, NICE recommended a change in diagnostic criteria in 2015. Aim: To compare diabetes associated maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies complicated by GDM diagnosed using IADPSG criteria only, to those with GDM diagnosed using both IADPSG and NICE 2015 criteria. GDM screening was risk factor based. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a trial of women with GDM diagnosed by the IADPSG criteria (fasting blood glucose (BG) ≥ 5.1 mmol/L, 1 h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L and 2 h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L). Outcomes were compared for two groups: NICE + IADPSG defined as those with GDM diagnosed by both the NICE 2015 and IADPSG criteria (fasting BG ≥ 5.6 mmol/L, 2 h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L); and IADPSG-ONLY (fasting BG 5.1 mmol/L to 5.5 mmol/L, and/or 1-hour ≥10.0 mmol/L, and 2 h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L). We were not able to obtain data for women with a 2-h value between BG 7.8–8.4 mmol/L (i.e., NICE-ONLY; NICE 2015 positive and IADPSG negative). All women were treated for GDM using targets of fasting BG < 5.3 mmol/L and 1-h post prandial BG < 7.8 mmol/L respectively. Results: Of 159 women, 65 (40.9%) were NICE + IADPSG and 94 (59.1%) IADPSG-ONLY. Hypoglycaemic medication use was similar in both groups: 52.3% NICE + IADPSG, 46.8% IADPSG-ONLY, OR 1.0 (0.5–1.9). The IADPSG-ONLY group delivered later than the NICE + IADPSG group; 39.0 weeks (sd 1.4) compared to 38.2 weeks (sd 2.5), p value 0.02. Fewer caesarean sections occurred in IADPSG-ONLY group 30.9% vs. 52.3%, OR 0.4 (0.2–0.9). Birthweight, large for gestational age, and other neonatal complications were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: Gestational diabetes-associated perinatal complications were similar in both groups. The IADPSG criteria detect women with evidence of ongoing hyperglycaemia who may benefit from treatment during pregnancy. MDPI 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6209967/ /pubmed/30360376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100376 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bhatia, Meena Mackillop, Lucy H. Bartlett, Katy Loerup, Lise Kenworthy, Yvonne Levy, Jonathan C. Farmer, Andrew J. Velardo, Carmelo Tarassenko, Lionel Hirst, Jane E. Clinical Implications of the NICE 2015 Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus |
title | Clinical Implications of the NICE 2015 Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus |
title_full | Clinical Implications of the NICE 2015 Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus |
title_fullStr | Clinical Implications of the NICE 2015 Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Implications of the NICE 2015 Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus |
title_short | Clinical Implications of the NICE 2015 Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus |
title_sort | clinical implications of the nice 2015 criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30360376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100376 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhatiameena clinicalimplicationsofthenice2015criteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitus AT mackilloplucyh clinicalimplicationsofthenice2015criteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitus AT bartlettkaty clinicalimplicationsofthenice2015criteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitus AT loeruplise clinicalimplicationsofthenice2015criteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitus AT kenworthyyvonne clinicalimplicationsofthenice2015criteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitus AT levyjonathanc clinicalimplicationsofthenice2015criteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitus AT farmerandrewj clinicalimplicationsofthenice2015criteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitus AT velardocarmelo clinicalimplicationsofthenice2015criteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitus AT tarassenkolionel clinicalimplicationsofthenice2015criteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitus AT hirstjanee clinicalimplicationsofthenice2015criteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitus |