Cargando…
Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration?
Recent work found that experimental pain appeared to negate alterations in cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) that occurred in response to motor learning acquisition of a novel tracing task. The goal of this experiment was to further investigate the interactive effects of pain stimulus...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8100179 |
_version_ | 1783367022658191360 |
---|---|
author | Dancey, Erin Yielder, Paul Murphy, Bernadette |
author_facet | Dancey, Erin Yielder, Paul Murphy, Bernadette |
author_sort | Dancey, Erin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent work found that experimental pain appeared to negate alterations in cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) that occurred in response to motor learning acquisition of a novel tracing task. The goal of this experiment was to further investigate the interactive effects of pain stimulus location on motor learning acquisition, retention, and sensorimotor processing. Three groups of twelve participants (n = 36) were randomly assigned to either a local capsaicin group, remote capsaicin group or contralateral capsaicin group. SEPs were collected at baseline, post-application of capsaicin cream, and following a motor learning task. Participants performed a motor tracing acquisition task followed by a pain-free retention task 24–48 h later while accuracy data was recorded. The P25 (p < 0.001) SEP peak significantly decreased following capsaicin application for all groups. Following motor learning acquisition, the N18 SEP peak decreased for the remote capsaicin group (p = 0.02) while the N30 (p = 0.002) SEP peaks increased significantly following motor learning acquisition for all groups. The local, remote and contralateral capsaicin groups improved in accuracy following motor learning (p < 0.001) with no significant differences between the groups. Early SEP alterations are markers of the neuroplasticity that accompanies acute pain and motor learning acquisition. Improved motor learning while in acute pain may be due to an increase in arousal, as opposed to increased attention to the limb performing the task. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6210022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62100222018-11-06 Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration? Dancey, Erin Yielder, Paul Murphy, Bernadette Brain Sci Article Recent work found that experimental pain appeared to negate alterations in cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) that occurred in response to motor learning acquisition of a novel tracing task. The goal of this experiment was to further investigate the interactive effects of pain stimulus location on motor learning acquisition, retention, and sensorimotor processing. Three groups of twelve participants (n = 36) were randomly assigned to either a local capsaicin group, remote capsaicin group or contralateral capsaicin group. SEPs were collected at baseline, post-application of capsaicin cream, and following a motor learning task. Participants performed a motor tracing acquisition task followed by a pain-free retention task 24–48 h later while accuracy data was recorded. The P25 (p < 0.001) SEP peak significantly decreased following capsaicin application for all groups. Following motor learning acquisition, the N18 SEP peak decreased for the remote capsaicin group (p = 0.02) while the N30 (p = 0.002) SEP peaks increased significantly following motor learning acquisition for all groups. The local, remote and contralateral capsaicin groups improved in accuracy following motor learning (p < 0.001) with no significant differences between the groups. Early SEP alterations are markers of the neuroplasticity that accompanies acute pain and motor learning acquisition. Improved motor learning while in acute pain may be due to an increase in arousal, as opposed to increased attention to the limb performing the task. MDPI 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6210022/ /pubmed/30250009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8100179 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dancey, Erin Yielder, Paul Murphy, Bernadette Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration? |
title | Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration? |
title_full | Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration? |
title_fullStr | Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration? |
title_short | Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration? |
title_sort | does location of tonic pain differentially impact motor learning and sensorimotor integration? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8100179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danceyerin doeslocationoftonicpaindifferentiallyimpactmotorlearningandsensorimotorintegration AT yielderpaul doeslocationoftonicpaindifferentiallyimpactmotorlearningandsensorimotorintegration AT murphybernadette doeslocationoftonicpaindifferentiallyimpactmotorlearningandsensorimotorintegration |