Cargando…

Discrimination of Malus Taxa with Different Scent Intensities Using Electronic Nose and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Floral scent is important in plant reproduction and also has aesthetic implications. However, the accurate determination of aroma is presently limited by the available collection and analysis tools. In this study, the floral scents of four crabapple taxa exhibiting faint, weak, clear, and strong sce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Junjun, Zhang, Wangxiang, Zhou, Ting, Zhang, Dandan, Zhang, Donglin, Zhang, Long, Wang, Guibin, Cao, Fuliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30322071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18103429
_version_ 1783367039085182976
author Fan, Junjun
Zhang, Wangxiang
Zhou, Ting
Zhang, Dandan
Zhang, Donglin
Zhang, Long
Wang, Guibin
Cao, Fuliang
author_facet Fan, Junjun
Zhang, Wangxiang
Zhou, Ting
Zhang, Dandan
Zhang, Donglin
Zhang, Long
Wang, Guibin
Cao, Fuliang
author_sort Fan, Junjun
collection PubMed
description Floral scent is important in plant reproduction and also has aesthetic implications. However, the accurate determination of aroma is presently limited by the available collection and analysis tools. In this study, the floral scents of four crabapple taxa exhibiting faint, weak, clear, and strong scent intensities were comparatively analyzed by electronic nose (E-nose) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The E-nose was able to effectively group the different taxa in the principal component analysis in correspondence with scent intensity. GC–MS analysis identified a total of 60 volatile compounds. The content of nitrogen-containing compounds and aliphatics and the number of unique components of the more aromatic taxa was significantly higher than the less aromatic taxa. α-Cedrene, β-cedrene, 5-methyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one, benzyl alcohol, linalool, and 4-pyrrolidinopyridine contributed significantly to taxon separation. The pattern recognition results confirmed that the E-nose results corroborated the GC–MS results. Furthermore, partial least squares regression analysis between the aromatic constituents and sensors indicated that particular sensors were highly sensitive to N-containing compounds, aliphatics, and terpenes. In conclusion, the E-nose is capable of discriminating crabapple taxa of different scent intensities in both a qualitative and quantitative respect, presenting a rapid and accurate reference approach for future applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6210091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62100912018-11-02 Discrimination of Malus Taxa with Different Scent Intensities Using Electronic Nose and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Fan, Junjun Zhang, Wangxiang Zhou, Ting Zhang, Dandan Zhang, Donglin Zhang, Long Wang, Guibin Cao, Fuliang Sensors (Basel) Article Floral scent is important in plant reproduction and also has aesthetic implications. However, the accurate determination of aroma is presently limited by the available collection and analysis tools. In this study, the floral scents of four crabapple taxa exhibiting faint, weak, clear, and strong scent intensities were comparatively analyzed by electronic nose (E-nose) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The E-nose was able to effectively group the different taxa in the principal component analysis in correspondence with scent intensity. GC–MS analysis identified a total of 60 volatile compounds. The content of nitrogen-containing compounds and aliphatics and the number of unique components of the more aromatic taxa was significantly higher than the less aromatic taxa. α-Cedrene, β-cedrene, 5-methyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one, benzyl alcohol, linalool, and 4-pyrrolidinopyridine contributed significantly to taxon separation. The pattern recognition results confirmed that the E-nose results corroborated the GC–MS results. Furthermore, partial least squares regression analysis between the aromatic constituents and sensors indicated that particular sensors were highly sensitive to N-containing compounds, aliphatics, and terpenes. In conclusion, the E-nose is capable of discriminating crabapple taxa of different scent intensities in both a qualitative and quantitative respect, presenting a rapid and accurate reference approach for future applications. MDPI 2018-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6210091/ /pubmed/30322071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18103429 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fan, Junjun
Zhang, Wangxiang
Zhou, Ting
Zhang, Dandan
Zhang, Donglin
Zhang, Long
Wang, Guibin
Cao, Fuliang
Discrimination of Malus Taxa with Different Scent Intensities Using Electronic Nose and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
title Discrimination of Malus Taxa with Different Scent Intensities Using Electronic Nose and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
title_full Discrimination of Malus Taxa with Different Scent Intensities Using Electronic Nose and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
title_fullStr Discrimination of Malus Taxa with Different Scent Intensities Using Electronic Nose and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Discrimination of Malus Taxa with Different Scent Intensities Using Electronic Nose and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
title_short Discrimination of Malus Taxa with Different Scent Intensities Using Electronic Nose and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
title_sort discrimination of malus taxa with different scent intensities using electronic nose and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30322071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18103429
work_keys_str_mv AT fanjunjun discriminationofmalustaxawithdifferentscentintensitiesusingelectronicnoseandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT zhangwangxiang discriminationofmalustaxawithdifferentscentintensitiesusingelectronicnoseandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT zhouting discriminationofmalustaxawithdifferentscentintensitiesusingelectronicnoseandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT zhangdandan discriminationofmalustaxawithdifferentscentintensitiesusingelectronicnoseandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT zhangdonglin discriminationofmalustaxawithdifferentscentintensitiesusingelectronicnoseandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT zhanglong discriminationofmalustaxawithdifferentscentintensitiesusingelectronicnoseandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT wangguibin discriminationofmalustaxawithdifferentscentintensitiesusingelectronicnoseandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT caofuliang discriminationofmalustaxawithdifferentscentintensitiesusingelectronicnoseandgaschromatographymassspectrometry