Cargando…

‘Sustainable’ Rather Than ‘Subsistence’ Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients’ Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models

South Australian (SA) food charity recipients’ perspectives were sought on existing services and ideas for improvement of food assistance models to address food insecurity. Seven focus groups were conducted between October and November 2017 with 54 adults. Thematically analysed data revealed five th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Booth, Sue, Pollard, Christina, Coveney, John, Goodwin-Smith, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30248978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102086
_version_ 1783367138901229568
author Booth, Sue
Pollard, Christina
Coveney, John
Goodwin-Smith, Ian
author_facet Booth, Sue
Pollard, Christina
Coveney, John
Goodwin-Smith, Ian
author_sort Booth, Sue
collection PubMed
description South Australian (SA) food charity recipients’ perspectives were sought on existing services and ideas for improvement of food assistance models to address food insecurity. Seven focus groups were conducted between October and November 2017 with 54 adults. Thematically analysed data revealed five themes: (1) Emotional cost and consequences of seeking food relief; (2) Dissatisfaction with inaccessible services and inappropriate food; (3) Returning the favour—a desire for reciprocity; (4) Desiring help beyond food; and, (5) “It’s a social thing”, the desire for social interaction and connection. Findings revealed that some aspects of the SA food assistance services were disempowering for recipients. Recipients desired more empowering forms of food assistance that humanise their experience and shift the locus of control and place power back into their hands. Some traditional models, such as provision of supermarket vouchers, empower individuals by fostering autonomy and enabling food choice in socially acceptable ways. Improvement in the quality of existing food assistance models, should focus on recipient informed models which re-dress existing power relations. Services which are more strongly aligned with typical features of social enterprise models were generally favoured over traditional models. Services which are recipient-centred, strive to empower recipients and provide opportunities for active involvement, social connection and broader support were preferred.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6210539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62105392018-11-02 ‘Sustainable’ Rather Than ‘Subsistence’ Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients’ Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models Booth, Sue Pollard, Christina Coveney, John Goodwin-Smith, Ian Int J Environ Res Public Health Article South Australian (SA) food charity recipients’ perspectives were sought on existing services and ideas for improvement of food assistance models to address food insecurity. Seven focus groups were conducted between October and November 2017 with 54 adults. Thematically analysed data revealed five themes: (1) Emotional cost and consequences of seeking food relief; (2) Dissatisfaction with inaccessible services and inappropriate food; (3) Returning the favour—a desire for reciprocity; (4) Desiring help beyond food; and, (5) “It’s a social thing”, the desire for social interaction and connection. Findings revealed that some aspects of the SA food assistance services were disempowering for recipients. Recipients desired more empowering forms of food assistance that humanise their experience and shift the locus of control and place power back into their hands. Some traditional models, such as provision of supermarket vouchers, empower individuals by fostering autonomy and enabling food choice in socially acceptable ways. Improvement in the quality of existing food assistance models, should focus on recipient informed models which re-dress existing power relations. Services which are more strongly aligned with typical features of social enterprise models were generally favoured over traditional models. Services which are recipient-centred, strive to empower recipients and provide opportunities for active involvement, social connection and broader support were preferred. MDPI 2018-09-21 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6210539/ /pubmed/30248978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102086 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Booth, Sue
Pollard, Christina
Coveney, John
Goodwin-Smith, Ian
‘Sustainable’ Rather Than ‘Subsistence’ Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients’ Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models
title ‘Sustainable’ Rather Than ‘Subsistence’ Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients’ Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models
title_full ‘Sustainable’ Rather Than ‘Subsistence’ Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients’ Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models
title_fullStr ‘Sustainable’ Rather Than ‘Subsistence’ Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients’ Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models
title_full_unstemmed ‘Sustainable’ Rather Than ‘Subsistence’ Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients’ Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models
title_short ‘Sustainable’ Rather Than ‘Subsistence’ Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients’ Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models
title_sort ‘sustainable’ rather than ‘subsistence’ food assistance solutions to food insecurity: south australian recipients’ perspectives on traditional and social enterprise models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30248978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102086
work_keys_str_mv AT boothsue sustainableratherthansubsistencefoodassistancesolutionstofoodinsecuritysouthaustralianrecipientsperspectivesontraditionalandsocialenterprisemodels
AT pollardchristina sustainableratherthansubsistencefoodassistancesolutionstofoodinsecuritysouthaustralianrecipientsperspectivesontraditionalandsocialenterprisemodels
AT coveneyjohn sustainableratherthansubsistencefoodassistancesolutionstofoodinsecuritysouthaustralianrecipientsperspectivesontraditionalandsocialenterprisemodels
AT goodwinsmithian sustainableratherthansubsistencefoodassistancesolutionstofoodinsecuritysouthaustralianrecipientsperspectivesontraditionalandsocialenterprisemodels