Cargando…

Use of Clomiphene Citrate in minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization negatively impacts endometrial thickness: an argument for a freeze-all approach

OBJECTIVE: Minimal stimulation IVF is a treatment option that uses clomiphene citrate (CC). We sought to evaluate how CC impacts endometrial thickness during minimal stimulation IVF cycles. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 230 cycles in 119 poor ovarian response patients. The IVF cyc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reed, Beverly G., Wu, John L., Nemer, Laurice Bou, Carr, Bruce R, Bukulmez, Orhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30264948
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20180070
_version_ 1783367154929762304
author Reed, Beverly G.
Wu, John L.
Nemer, Laurice Bou
Carr, Bruce R
Bukulmez, Orhan
author_facet Reed, Beverly G.
Wu, John L.
Nemer, Laurice Bou
Carr, Bruce R
Bukulmez, Orhan
author_sort Reed, Beverly G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Minimal stimulation IVF is a treatment option that uses clomiphene citrate (CC). We sought to evaluate how CC impacts endometrial thickness during minimal stimulation IVF cycles. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 230 cycles in 119 poor ovarian response patients. The IVF cycles were studied in three groups: 130 minimal stimulation cycles, 29 mild stimulation cycles, and 30 conventional high dose gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cycles. Thirty-three minimal stimulation IVF patients had 41 frozen embryo transfers (FET) which allowed us to study whether the CC effects were prolonged. RESULTS: Endometrial thickness in the minimal stimulation group was significantly lower than the mild and conventional stimulation groups (7.3±2.2mm versus 11.4±3.3mm versus 12.9±3.8mm, respectively, p<0.0001). In patients who underwent minimal stimulation IVF followed by FET, significantly thicker endometrial thickness was achieved during their FET cycles as compared to their minimal stimulation cycles (7.95±2.1mm versus 10.3±1.8mm, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: We concluded that endometrial thickness is impacted during minimal stimulation IVF cycles. Since negative effects on endometrial thickness are not observed in the patients’ subsequent FET cycle, a freeze-all approach is justified to mitigate adverse endometrial effects of CC in minimal stimulation IVF cycles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6210609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62106092018-11-13 Use of Clomiphene Citrate in minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization negatively impacts endometrial thickness: an argument for a freeze-all approach Reed, Beverly G. Wu, John L. Nemer, Laurice Bou Carr, Bruce R Bukulmez, Orhan JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVE: Minimal stimulation IVF is a treatment option that uses clomiphene citrate (CC). We sought to evaluate how CC impacts endometrial thickness during minimal stimulation IVF cycles. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 230 cycles in 119 poor ovarian response patients. The IVF cycles were studied in three groups: 130 minimal stimulation cycles, 29 mild stimulation cycles, and 30 conventional high dose gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cycles. Thirty-three minimal stimulation IVF patients had 41 frozen embryo transfers (FET) which allowed us to study whether the CC effects were prolonged. RESULTS: Endometrial thickness in the minimal stimulation group was significantly lower than the mild and conventional stimulation groups (7.3±2.2mm versus 11.4±3.3mm versus 12.9±3.8mm, respectively, p<0.0001). In patients who underwent minimal stimulation IVF followed by FET, significantly thicker endometrial thickness was achieved during their FET cycles as compared to their minimal stimulation cycles (7.95±2.1mm versus 10.3±1.8mm, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: We concluded that endometrial thickness is impacted during minimal stimulation IVF cycles. Since negative effects on endometrial thickness are not observed in the patients’ subsequent FET cycle, a freeze-all approach is justified to mitigate adverse endometrial effects of CC in minimal stimulation IVF cycles. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6210609/ /pubmed/30264948 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20180070 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Reed, Beverly G.
Wu, John L.
Nemer, Laurice Bou
Carr, Bruce R
Bukulmez, Orhan
Use of Clomiphene Citrate in minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization negatively impacts endometrial thickness: an argument for a freeze-all approach
title Use of Clomiphene Citrate in minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization negatively impacts endometrial thickness: an argument for a freeze-all approach
title_full Use of Clomiphene Citrate in minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization negatively impacts endometrial thickness: an argument for a freeze-all approach
title_fullStr Use of Clomiphene Citrate in minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization negatively impacts endometrial thickness: an argument for a freeze-all approach
title_full_unstemmed Use of Clomiphene Citrate in minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization negatively impacts endometrial thickness: an argument for a freeze-all approach
title_short Use of Clomiphene Citrate in minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization negatively impacts endometrial thickness: an argument for a freeze-all approach
title_sort use of clomiphene citrate in minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization negatively impacts endometrial thickness: an argument for a freeze-all approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30264948
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20180070
work_keys_str_mv AT reedbeverlyg useofclomiphenecitrateinminimalstimulationinvitrofertilizationnegativelyimpactsendometrialthicknessanargumentforafreezeallapproach
AT wujohnl useofclomiphenecitrateinminimalstimulationinvitrofertilizationnegativelyimpactsendometrialthicknessanargumentforafreezeallapproach
AT nemerlauricebou useofclomiphenecitrateinminimalstimulationinvitrofertilizationnegativelyimpactsendometrialthicknessanargumentforafreezeallapproach
AT carrbrucer useofclomiphenecitrateinminimalstimulationinvitrofertilizationnegativelyimpactsendometrialthicknessanargumentforafreezeallapproach
AT bukulmezorhan useofclomiphenecitrateinminimalstimulationinvitrofertilizationnegativelyimpactsendometrialthicknessanargumentforafreezeallapproach