Cargando…
A Field Procedure for the Assessment of the Centring Uncertainty of Geodetic and Surveying Instruments
The uncertainty evaluation of survey measurements is a daily and essential task in any surveying work. The result of a measurement is, in fact, only complete when accompanied by a statement of its uncertainty. Miscentring, or centring error, is one of the sources of uncertainty in every basic survey...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18103187 |
_version_ | 1783367177063104512 |
---|---|
author | García-Balboa, José L. Ruiz-Armenteros, Antonio M. Rodríguez-Avi, José Reinoso-Gordo, Juan F. Robledillo-Román, Juan |
author_facet | García-Balboa, José L. Ruiz-Armenteros, Antonio M. Rodríguez-Avi, José Reinoso-Gordo, Juan F. Robledillo-Román, Juan |
author_sort | García-Balboa, José L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The uncertainty evaluation of survey measurements is a daily and essential task in any surveying work. The result of a measurement is, in fact, only complete when accompanied by a statement of its uncertainty. Miscentring, or centring error, is one of the sources of uncertainty in every basic survey measurement which may have a great effect on horizontal angle measurement for short distances. In the literature, different terms and values are considered to refer to this source of uncertainty. Standard ISO 17123 provides different procedures for assessing the measurement uncertainty of geodetic and surveying instruments, with the aim of checking their suitability for the intending and immediate task in field conditions. ISO 17123 is aware of the importance of uncertainty in the instrument centring, but it does not propose any standardised procedure for its assessment. In this study, we propose such a procedure following a Type A evaluation (through the statistical analysis of series of observations), avoiding using values from Type B evaluations (from manufacturer’s specifications, handbooks, personal experiences, etc.) that could be unsuitable for the conditions of the task. Uncertainty can be individualised for a particular instrument (which includes the plummet type), ground mark, operator, and other factors on which the results could be dependent. The testing methodology includes a configuration of the test field, measurements, and calculation, following the structure of each part of the standard ISO 17123. An experimental application is included with two different total stations, which also includes a statistical analysis of the results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6210703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62107032018-11-02 A Field Procedure for the Assessment of the Centring Uncertainty of Geodetic and Surveying Instruments García-Balboa, José L. Ruiz-Armenteros, Antonio M. Rodríguez-Avi, José Reinoso-Gordo, Juan F. Robledillo-Román, Juan Sensors (Basel) Article The uncertainty evaluation of survey measurements is a daily and essential task in any surveying work. The result of a measurement is, in fact, only complete when accompanied by a statement of its uncertainty. Miscentring, or centring error, is one of the sources of uncertainty in every basic survey measurement which may have a great effect on horizontal angle measurement for short distances. In the literature, different terms and values are considered to refer to this source of uncertainty. Standard ISO 17123 provides different procedures for assessing the measurement uncertainty of geodetic and surveying instruments, with the aim of checking their suitability for the intending and immediate task in field conditions. ISO 17123 is aware of the importance of uncertainty in the instrument centring, but it does not propose any standardised procedure for its assessment. In this study, we propose such a procedure following a Type A evaluation (through the statistical analysis of series of observations), avoiding using values from Type B evaluations (from manufacturer’s specifications, handbooks, personal experiences, etc.) that could be unsuitable for the conditions of the task. Uncertainty can be individualised for a particular instrument (which includes the plummet type), ground mark, operator, and other factors on which the results could be dependent. The testing methodology includes a configuration of the test field, measurements, and calculation, following the structure of each part of the standard ISO 17123. An experimental application is included with two different total stations, which also includes a statistical analysis of the results. MDPI 2018-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6210703/ /pubmed/30241396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18103187 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article García-Balboa, José L. Ruiz-Armenteros, Antonio M. Rodríguez-Avi, José Reinoso-Gordo, Juan F. Robledillo-Román, Juan A Field Procedure for the Assessment of the Centring Uncertainty of Geodetic and Surveying Instruments |
title | A Field Procedure for the Assessment of the Centring Uncertainty of Geodetic and Surveying Instruments |
title_full | A Field Procedure for the Assessment of the Centring Uncertainty of Geodetic and Surveying Instruments |
title_fullStr | A Field Procedure for the Assessment of the Centring Uncertainty of Geodetic and Surveying Instruments |
title_full_unstemmed | A Field Procedure for the Assessment of the Centring Uncertainty of Geodetic and Surveying Instruments |
title_short | A Field Procedure for the Assessment of the Centring Uncertainty of Geodetic and Surveying Instruments |
title_sort | field procedure for the assessment of the centring uncertainty of geodetic and surveying instruments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18103187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciabalboajosel afieldprocedurefortheassessmentofthecentringuncertaintyofgeodeticandsurveyinginstruments AT ruizarmenterosantoniom afieldprocedurefortheassessmentofthecentringuncertaintyofgeodeticandsurveyinginstruments AT rodriguezavijose afieldprocedurefortheassessmentofthecentringuncertaintyofgeodeticandsurveyinginstruments AT reinosogordojuanf afieldprocedurefortheassessmentofthecentringuncertaintyofgeodeticandsurveyinginstruments AT robledilloromanjuan afieldprocedurefortheassessmentofthecentringuncertaintyofgeodeticandsurveyinginstruments AT garciabalboajosel fieldprocedurefortheassessmentofthecentringuncertaintyofgeodeticandsurveyinginstruments AT ruizarmenterosantoniom fieldprocedurefortheassessmentofthecentringuncertaintyofgeodeticandsurveyinginstruments AT rodriguezavijose fieldprocedurefortheassessmentofthecentringuncertaintyofgeodeticandsurveyinginstruments AT reinosogordojuanf fieldprocedurefortheassessmentofthecentringuncertaintyofgeodeticandsurveyinginstruments AT robledilloromanjuan fieldprocedurefortheassessmentofthecentringuncertaintyofgeodeticandsurveyinginstruments |