Cargando…

An Optimized Two-Step Magnetic Correction Strategy by Means of a Lagrange Multiplier Estimator with an Ellipsoid Constraint

The geomagnetic field is as fundamental a constituent of passive navigation as Earth’s gravity. In cases where no other external attitude reference is available, for the direct heading angle estimation by a typical magnetic compass, a two-step optimized correction algorithm is proposed to correct th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Linlin, Geng, Jingtong, Yang, Hanrui, Wang, Yunqi, Fu, Zhaolong, Meng, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274309
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18103284
_version_ 1783367188873216000
author Xia, Linlin
Geng, Jingtong
Yang, Hanrui
Wang, Yunqi
Fu, Zhaolong
Meng, Bo
author_facet Xia, Linlin
Geng, Jingtong
Yang, Hanrui
Wang, Yunqi
Fu, Zhaolong
Meng, Bo
author_sort Xia, Linlin
collection PubMed
description The geomagnetic field is as fundamental a constituent of passive navigation as Earth’s gravity. In cases where no other external attitude reference is available, for the direct heading angle estimation by a typical magnetic compass, a two-step optimized correction algorithm is proposed to correct the model coefficients caused by hard and soft iron nearby. Specifically, in Step 1, a Levenberg-Marquardt (L-M) fitting estimator with an ellipsoid constraint is applied to solve the hard magnetic coefficients. In Step 2, a Lagrange multiplier estimator is used to deal with the soft magnetic iron circumstance. The essential attribute of “the two-step” lies in its eliminating the coupling effects of hard and soft magnetic fields, and their mutual interferences on the pure geomagnetic field. Under the conditions of non-deterministic magnetic interference sources with noise, the numerical simulation by referring to International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF), and the laboratory tests based upon the turntable experiments with Honeywell HMR3000 compass (Honeywell, Morristown, NJ, USA) conducted, the experimental results indicate that, in the presence of the variation of multi-magnetic interferences, the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) value of the estimated total magnetic flux density by the proposed two-step estimator falls to 0.125 μT from its initial 2.503 μT, and the mean values of the heading angle error estimates are less than 1°. The proposed solution therefore, exhibits ideal convergent properties, fairly meeting the accuracy requirements of non-tactical level navigation applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6210750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62107502018-11-02 An Optimized Two-Step Magnetic Correction Strategy by Means of a Lagrange Multiplier Estimator with an Ellipsoid Constraint Xia, Linlin Geng, Jingtong Yang, Hanrui Wang, Yunqi Fu, Zhaolong Meng, Bo Sensors (Basel) Article The geomagnetic field is as fundamental a constituent of passive navigation as Earth’s gravity. In cases where no other external attitude reference is available, for the direct heading angle estimation by a typical magnetic compass, a two-step optimized correction algorithm is proposed to correct the model coefficients caused by hard and soft iron nearby. Specifically, in Step 1, a Levenberg-Marquardt (L-M) fitting estimator with an ellipsoid constraint is applied to solve the hard magnetic coefficients. In Step 2, a Lagrange multiplier estimator is used to deal with the soft magnetic iron circumstance. The essential attribute of “the two-step” lies in its eliminating the coupling effects of hard and soft magnetic fields, and their mutual interferences on the pure geomagnetic field. Under the conditions of non-deterministic magnetic interference sources with noise, the numerical simulation by referring to International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF), and the laboratory tests based upon the turntable experiments with Honeywell HMR3000 compass (Honeywell, Morristown, NJ, USA) conducted, the experimental results indicate that, in the presence of the variation of multi-magnetic interferences, the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) value of the estimated total magnetic flux density by the proposed two-step estimator falls to 0.125 μT from its initial 2.503 μT, and the mean values of the heading angle error estimates are less than 1°. The proposed solution therefore, exhibits ideal convergent properties, fairly meeting the accuracy requirements of non-tactical level navigation applications. MDPI 2018-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6210750/ /pubmed/30274309 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18103284 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xia, Linlin
Geng, Jingtong
Yang, Hanrui
Wang, Yunqi
Fu, Zhaolong
Meng, Bo
An Optimized Two-Step Magnetic Correction Strategy by Means of a Lagrange Multiplier Estimator with an Ellipsoid Constraint
title An Optimized Two-Step Magnetic Correction Strategy by Means of a Lagrange Multiplier Estimator with an Ellipsoid Constraint
title_full An Optimized Two-Step Magnetic Correction Strategy by Means of a Lagrange Multiplier Estimator with an Ellipsoid Constraint
title_fullStr An Optimized Two-Step Magnetic Correction Strategy by Means of a Lagrange Multiplier Estimator with an Ellipsoid Constraint
title_full_unstemmed An Optimized Two-Step Magnetic Correction Strategy by Means of a Lagrange Multiplier Estimator with an Ellipsoid Constraint
title_short An Optimized Two-Step Magnetic Correction Strategy by Means of a Lagrange Multiplier Estimator with an Ellipsoid Constraint
title_sort optimized two-step magnetic correction strategy by means of a lagrange multiplier estimator with an ellipsoid constraint
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274309
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18103284
work_keys_str_mv AT xialinlin anoptimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint
AT gengjingtong anoptimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint
AT yanghanrui anoptimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint
AT wangyunqi anoptimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint
AT fuzhaolong anoptimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint
AT mengbo anoptimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint
AT xialinlin optimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint
AT gengjingtong optimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint
AT yanghanrui optimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint
AT wangyunqi optimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint
AT fuzhaolong optimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint
AT mengbo optimizedtwostepmagneticcorrectionstrategybymeansofalagrangemultiplierestimatorwithanellipsoidconstraint