Cargando…

Cytological Scoring of Breast Lesions and Comparison with Histopathological Findings

CONTEXT: Cytological assessment using various morphological parameters helps segregate breast lesions in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) into different categories. The prognosis and the line of management of each category differ accordingly. AIMS: This study aims at assessing the validity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abraham, Betty, Sarojini, T. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30498293
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_84_17
_version_ 1783367202288697344
author Abraham, Betty
Sarojini, T. R.
author_facet Abraham, Betty
Sarojini, T. R.
author_sort Abraham, Betty
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Cytological assessment using various morphological parameters helps segregate breast lesions in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) into different categories. The prognosis and the line of management of each category differ accordingly. AIMS: This study aims at assessing the validity of Modified Masood's Scoring Index (MMSI) by the evaluation of cytomorphological features of various breast lesions compared with histopathological findings. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study done in 65 female patients with palpable or nonpalpable breast lesions, undergoing FNAC and biopsy over a period of 18 months from December 1, 2012, to May 31, 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MMSI categorizes breast lesions, based on six cytological parameters into different categories such as nonproliferative breast disease (NPBD), proliferative breast disease (PBD) without atypia, PBD with atypia, and malignancy. The findings are compared with gold standard histopathological diagnosis. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Percentage of agreement, Kappa statistics, and Chi-square test. RESULTS: Of the total 65 cases, all cases in MMSI category I and IV showed good histopathological correlation. The agreement between MMSI and histopathology was 93.8% which is more when compared with 72.3% agreement between cytology without scoring and histopathology. MMSI has increased the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC to 93.8% from 80%. CONCLUSION: The scoring system is easily reproducible, simple, and reliable. MMSI proved good histopathological correlation in category I and IV. This scoring technique has clearly demarcated those cases requiring surgical management. It is applicable for palpable and nonpalpable cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6210810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62108102018-11-29 Cytological Scoring of Breast Lesions and Comparison with Histopathological Findings Abraham, Betty Sarojini, T. R. J Cytol Original Article CONTEXT: Cytological assessment using various morphological parameters helps segregate breast lesions in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) into different categories. The prognosis and the line of management of each category differ accordingly. AIMS: This study aims at assessing the validity of Modified Masood's Scoring Index (MMSI) by the evaluation of cytomorphological features of various breast lesions compared with histopathological findings. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study done in 65 female patients with palpable or nonpalpable breast lesions, undergoing FNAC and biopsy over a period of 18 months from December 1, 2012, to May 31, 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MMSI categorizes breast lesions, based on six cytological parameters into different categories such as nonproliferative breast disease (NPBD), proliferative breast disease (PBD) without atypia, PBD with atypia, and malignancy. The findings are compared with gold standard histopathological diagnosis. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Percentage of agreement, Kappa statistics, and Chi-square test. RESULTS: Of the total 65 cases, all cases in MMSI category I and IV showed good histopathological correlation. The agreement between MMSI and histopathology was 93.8% which is more when compared with 72.3% agreement between cytology without scoring and histopathology. MMSI has increased the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC to 93.8% from 80%. CONCLUSION: The scoring system is easily reproducible, simple, and reliable. MMSI proved good histopathological correlation in category I and IV. This scoring technique has clearly demarcated those cases requiring surgical management. It is applicable for palpable and nonpalpable cases. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6210810/ /pubmed/30498293 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_84_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Cytology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abraham, Betty
Sarojini, T. R.
Cytological Scoring of Breast Lesions and Comparison with Histopathological Findings
title Cytological Scoring of Breast Lesions and Comparison with Histopathological Findings
title_full Cytological Scoring of Breast Lesions and Comparison with Histopathological Findings
title_fullStr Cytological Scoring of Breast Lesions and Comparison with Histopathological Findings
title_full_unstemmed Cytological Scoring of Breast Lesions and Comparison with Histopathological Findings
title_short Cytological Scoring of Breast Lesions and Comparison with Histopathological Findings
title_sort cytological scoring of breast lesions and comparison with histopathological findings
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30498293
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_84_17
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahambetty cytologicalscoringofbreastlesionsandcomparisonwithhistopathologicalfindings
AT sarojinitr cytologicalscoringofbreastlesionsandcomparisonwithhistopathologicalfindings