Cargando…

Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes

Impact evaluations of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have demonstrated lower than expected health gains, in some cases due to low uptake and sustained adoption of interventions at a community level. These findings represent common challenges for public health and development programmes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delea, Maryann G., Sclar, Gloria D., Woreta, Mulat, Haardörfer, Regine, Nagel, Corey L., Caruso, Bethany A., Dreibelbis, Robert, Gobezayehu, Abebe G., Clasen, Thomas F., Freeman, Matthew C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274212
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102139
_version_ 1783367250276777984
author Delea, Maryann G.
Sclar, Gloria D.
Woreta, Mulat
Haardörfer, Regine
Nagel, Corey L.
Caruso, Bethany A.
Dreibelbis, Robert
Gobezayehu, Abebe G.
Clasen, Thomas F.
Freeman, Matthew C.
author_facet Delea, Maryann G.
Sclar, Gloria D.
Woreta, Mulat
Haardörfer, Regine
Nagel, Corey L.
Caruso, Bethany A.
Dreibelbis, Robert
Gobezayehu, Abebe G.
Clasen, Thomas F.
Freeman, Matthew C.
author_sort Delea, Maryann G.
collection PubMed
description Impact evaluations of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have demonstrated lower than expected health gains, in some cases due to low uptake and sustained adoption of interventions at a community level. These findings represent common challenges for public health and development programmes relying on collective action. One possible explanation may be low collective efficacy (CE)—perceptions regarding a group’s ability to execute actions related to a common goal. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a metric to assess factors related to CE. We conducted this research within a cluster-randomised sanitation and hygiene trial in Amhara, Ethiopia. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine underlying structures of CE for men and women in rural Ethiopia. We produced three CE scales: one each for men and women that allow for examinations of gender-specific mechanisms through which CE operates, and one 26-item CE scale that can be used across genders. All scales demonstrated high construct validity. CE factor scores were significantly higher for men than women, even among household-level male-female dyads. These CE scales will allow implementers to better design and target community-level interventions, and examine the role of CE in the effectiveness of community-based programming.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6211028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62110282018-11-02 Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes Delea, Maryann G. Sclar, Gloria D. Woreta, Mulat Haardörfer, Regine Nagel, Corey L. Caruso, Bethany A. Dreibelbis, Robert Gobezayehu, Abebe G. Clasen, Thomas F. Freeman, Matthew C. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Impact evaluations of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have demonstrated lower than expected health gains, in some cases due to low uptake and sustained adoption of interventions at a community level. These findings represent common challenges for public health and development programmes relying on collective action. One possible explanation may be low collective efficacy (CE)—perceptions regarding a group’s ability to execute actions related to a common goal. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a metric to assess factors related to CE. We conducted this research within a cluster-randomised sanitation and hygiene trial in Amhara, Ethiopia. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine underlying structures of CE for men and women in rural Ethiopia. We produced three CE scales: one each for men and women that allow for examinations of gender-specific mechanisms through which CE operates, and one 26-item CE scale that can be used across genders. All scales demonstrated high construct validity. CE factor scores were significantly higher for men than women, even among household-level male-female dyads. These CE scales will allow implementers to better design and target community-level interventions, and examine the role of CE in the effectiveness of community-based programming. MDPI 2018-09-28 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6211028/ /pubmed/30274212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102139 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Delea, Maryann G.
Sclar, Gloria D.
Woreta, Mulat
Haardörfer, Regine
Nagel, Corey L.
Caruso, Bethany A.
Dreibelbis, Robert
Gobezayehu, Abebe G.
Clasen, Thomas F.
Freeman, Matthew C.
Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes
title Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes
title_full Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes
title_fullStr Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes
title_full_unstemmed Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes
title_short Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes
title_sort collective efficacy: development and validation of a measurement scale for use in public health and development programmes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274212
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102139
work_keys_str_mv AT deleamaryanng collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes
AT sclargloriad collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes
AT woretamulat collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes
AT haardorferregine collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes
AT nagelcoreyl collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes
AT carusobethanya collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes
AT dreibelbisrobert collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes
AT gobezayehuabebeg collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes
AT clasenthomasf collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes
AT freemanmatthewc collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes