Cargando…
Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes
Impact evaluations of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have demonstrated lower than expected health gains, in some cases due to low uptake and sustained adoption of interventions at a community level. These findings represent common challenges for public health and development programmes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102139 |
_version_ | 1783367250276777984 |
---|---|
author | Delea, Maryann G. Sclar, Gloria D. Woreta, Mulat Haardörfer, Regine Nagel, Corey L. Caruso, Bethany A. Dreibelbis, Robert Gobezayehu, Abebe G. Clasen, Thomas F. Freeman, Matthew C. |
author_facet | Delea, Maryann G. Sclar, Gloria D. Woreta, Mulat Haardörfer, Regine Nagel, Corey L. Caruso, Bethany A. Dreibelbis, Robert Gobezayehu, Abebe G. Clasen, Thomas F. Freeman, Matthew C. |
author_sort | Delea, Maryann G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Impact evaluations of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have demonstrated lower than expected health gains, in some cases due to low uptake and sustained adoption of interventions at a community level. These findings represent common challenges for public health and development programmes relying on collective action. One possible explanation may be low collective efficacy (CE)—perceptions regarding a group’s ability to execute actions related to a common goal. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a metric to assess factors related to CE. We conducted this research within a cluster-randomised sanitation and hygiene trial in Amhara, Ethiopia. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine underlying structures of CE for men and women in rural Ethiopia. We produced three CE scales: one each for men and women that allow for examinations of gender-specific mechanisms through which CE operates, and one 26-item CE scale that can be used across genders. All scales demonstrated high construct validity. CE factor scores were significantly higher for men than women, even among household-level male-female dyads. These CE scales will allow implementers to better design and target community-level interventions, and examine the role of CE in the effectiveness of community-based programming. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6211028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62110282018-11-02 Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes Delea, Maryann G. Sclar, Gloria D. Woreta, Mulat Haardörfer, Regine Nagel, Corey L. Caruso, Bethany A. Dreibelbis, Robert Gobezayehu, Abebe G. Clasen, Thomas F. Freeman, Matthew C. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Impact evaluations of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have demonstrated lower than expected health gains, in some cases due to low uptake and sustained adoption of interventions at a community level. These findings represent common challenges for public health and development programmes relying on collective action. One possible explanation may be low collective efficacy (CE)—perceptions regarding a group’s ability to execute actions related to a common goal. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a metric to assess factors related to CE. We conducted this research within a cluster-randomised sanitation and hygiene trial in Amhara, Ethiopia. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine underlying structures of CE for men and women in rural Ethiopia. We produced three CE scales: one each for men and women that allow for examinations of gender-specific mechanisms through which CE operates, and one 26-item CE scale that can be used across genders. All scales demonstrated high construct validity. CE factor scores were significantly higher for men than women, even among household-level male-female dyads. These CE scales will allow implementers to better design and target community-level interventions, and examine the role of CE in the effectiveness of community-based programming. MDPI 2018-09-28 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6211028/ /pubmed/30274212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102139 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Delea, Maryann G. Sclar, Gloria D. Woreta, Mulat Haardörfer, Regine Nagel, Corey L. Caruso, Bethany A. Dreibelbis, Robert Gobezayehu, Abebe G. Clasen, Thomas F. Freeman, Matthew C. Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes |
title | Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes |
title_full | Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes |
title_fullStr | Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes |
title_full_unstemmed | Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes |
title_short | Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes |
title_sort | collective efficacy: development and validation of a measurement scale for use in public health and development programmes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deleamaryanng collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes AT sclargloriad collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes AT woretamulat collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes AT haardorferregine collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes AT nagelcoreyl collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes AT carusobethanya collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes AT dreibelbisrobert collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes AT gobezayehuabebeg collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes AT clasenthomasf collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes AT freemanmatthewc collectiveefficacydevelopmentandvalidationofameasurementscaleforuseinpublichealthanddevelopmentprogrammes |