Cargando…

A Bayesian Approach to Understanding Sex Differences in Tuberculosis Disease Burden

Globally, men have a higher epidemiologic burden of tuberculosis (incidence, prevalence, mortality) than women do, possibly due to differences in disease incidence, treatment initiation, self-cure, and/or untreated-tuberculosis mortality rates. Using a simple, sex-stratified compartmental model, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horton, Katherine C, Sumner, Tom, Houben, Rein M G J, Corbett, Elizabeth L, White, Richard G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29955827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy131
_version_ 1783367296133103616
author Horton, Katherine C
Sumner, Tom
Houben, Rein M G J
Corbett, Elizabeth L
White, Richard G
author_facet Horton, Katherine C
Sumner, Tom
Houben, Rein M G J
Corbett, Elizabeth L
White, Richard G
author_sort Horton, Katherine C
collection PubMed
description Globally, men have a higher epidemiologic burden of tuberculosis (incidence, prevalence, mortality) than women do, possibly due to differences in disease incidence, treatment initiation, self-cure, and/or untreated-tuberculosis mortality rates. Using a simple, sex-stratified compartmental model, we employed a Bayesian approach to explore which factors most likely explain men’s higher burden. We applied the model to smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis in Vietnam (2006–2007) and Malawi (2013–2014). Posterior estimates were consistent with sex-specific prevalence and notifications in both countries. Results supported higher incidence in men and showed that both sexes faced longer durations of untreated disease than estimated by self-reports. Prior untreated disease durations were revised upward 8- to 24-fold, to 2.2 (95% credible interval: 1.7, 2.9) years for men in Vietnam and 2.8 (1.8, 4.1) years for men in Malawi, approximately a year longer than for women in each country. Results imply that substantial sex differences in tuberculosis burden are almost solely attributable to men’s disadvantages in disease incidence and untreated disease duration. The latter, for which self-reports provide a poor proxy, implies inadequate coverage of case-finding strategies. These results highlight an urgent need for better understanding of gender-related barriers faced by men and support the systematic targeting of men for screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6211250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62112502018-11-05 A Bayesian Approach to Understanding Sex Differences in Tuberculosis Disease Burden Horton, Katherine C Sumner, Tom Houben, Rein M G J Corbett, Elizabeth L White, Richard G Am J Epidemiol Practice of Epidemiology Globally, men have a higher epidemiologic burden of tuberculosis (incidence, prevalence, mortality) than women do, possibly due to differences in disease incidence, treatment initiation, self-cure, and/or untreated-tuberculosis mortality rates. Using a simple, sex-stratified compartmental model, we employed a Bayesian approach to explore which factors most likely explain men’s higher burden. We applied the model to smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis in Vietnam (2006–2007) and Malawi (2013–2014). Posterior estimates were consistent with sex-specific prevalence and notifications in both countries. Results supported higher incidence in men and showed that both sexes faced longer durations of untreated disease than estimated by self-reports. Prior untreated disease durations were revised upward 8- to 24-fold, to 2.2 (95% credible interval: 1.7, 2.9) years for men in Vietnam and 2.8 (1.8, 4.1) years for men in Malawi, approximately a year longer than for women in each country. Results imply that substantial sex differences in tuberculosis burden are almost solely attributable to men’s disadvantages in disease incidence and untreated disease duration. The latter, for which self-reports provide a poor proxy, implies inadequate coverage of case-finding strategies. These results highlight an urgent need for better understanding of gender-related barriers faced by men and support the systematic targeting of men for screening. Oxford University Press 2018-11 2018-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6211250/ /pubmed/29955827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy131 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Practice of Epidemiology
Horton, Katherine C
Sumner, Tom
Houben, Rein M G J
Corbett, Elizabeth L
White, Richard G
A Bayesian Approach to Understanding Sex Differences in Tuberculosis Disease Burden
title A Bayesian Approach to Understanding Sex Differences in Tuberculosis Disease Burden
title_full A Bayesian Approach to Understanding Sex Differences in Tuberculosis Disease Burden
title_fullStr A Bayesian Approach to Understanding Sex Differences in Tuberculosis Disease Burden
title_full_unstemmed A Bayesian Approach to Understanding Sex Differences in Tuberculosis Disease Burden
title_short A Bayesian Approach to Understanding Sex Differences in Tuberculosis Disease Burden
title_sort bayesian approach to understanding sex differences in tuberculosis disease burden
topic Practice of Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29955827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy131
work_keys_str_mv AT hortonkatherinec abayesianapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintuberculosisdiseaseburden
AT sumnertom abayesianapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintuberculosisdiseaseburden
AT houbenreinmgj abayesianapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintuberculosisdiseaseburden
AT corbettelizabethl abayesianapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintuberculosisdiseaseburden
AT whiterichardg abayesianapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintuberculosisdiseaseburden
AT hortonkatherinec bayesianapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintuberculosisdiseaseburden
AT sumnertom bayesianapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintuberculosisdiseaseburden
AT houbenreinmgj bayesianapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintuberculosisdiseaseburden
AT corbettelizabethl bayesianapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintuberculosisdiseaseburden
AT whiterichardg bayesianapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintuberculosisdiseaseburden