Cargando…

Satisfaction level in dental-phobic patients with implant-supported rehabilitation performed under general anaesthesia: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Phobic patients avoid dental treatment impairing their oral health and making it challenging to offer them prosthetic rehabilitation. This study evaluated patients’ experience of implant-supported prosthetic treatment after implantation performed under general anaesthesia due to dental p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sidenö, Louise, Hmaidouch, Rim, Brandt, Jan, von Krockow, Nadine, Weigl, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30382830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0644-x
_version_ 1783367339876548608
author Sidenö, Louise
Hmaidouch, Rim
Brandt, Jan
von Krockow, Nadine
Weigl, Paul
author_facet Sidenö, Louise
Hmaidouch, Rim
Brandt, Jan
von Krockow, Nadine
Weigl, Paul
author_sort Sidenö, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phobic patients avoid dental treatment impairing their oral health and making it challenging to offer them prosthetic rehabilitation. This study evaluated patients’ experience of implant-supported prosthetic treatment after implantation performed under general anaesthesia due to dental phobia and severe pharyngeal reflexes (SPR). The effect of gender, age and location of implantation on patient satisfaction was tested. METHODS: Two hundred five patients underwent implantation under general anesthesia both in maxilla and mandible, respectively. After a trans-gingival healing period of 6–8 weeks, fixed implant bridges were inserted. Patients completed oral health impact profile questionnaire (OHIP-14). An additional set of six special questions was also developed and considered. Analysis of the OHIP-14 total score was made using logistics regression. Wald chi-square test was used to analyse the effect of age, gender and location of implantation. Effect sizes were estimated as odds-ratios and associated 95% Wald confidence intervals. RESULTS: Eighty two of 205 patients were included after prosthetic treatment. After start, 38 patients were excluded (4 died and 34 couldn’t be reached). OHIP-14-analyses were made by 43 patients (30–90 years). 67% of patients were totally satisfied with the whole implant rehabilitation (scoring 0). Mean of total score was 2.5. Only age affected significantly (p = 0.014) patients satisfaction. The obtained data indicate that younger patients (30–64 years) especially women are less satisfied (4.95) than older patients (0.3) for age group (65–90 years).Special questions’ data showed that 94.5% were satisfied with their treatment. 77.3% continued regular check-up after treatment and 96.9% would undergo the same treatment again. 95.5% would recommend implants to a friend of colleague. CONCLUSION: Gender and location of implantation have no significant influence on patient satisfaction. Younger patients especially women are less satisfied than older patients. Phobic patients are totally satisfied with implant rehabilitation under general anaesthesia which means that this treatment can be considered as a treatment of choice giving these patients the same opportunity like others to improve their oral health and well-being.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6211469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62114692018-11-08 Satisfaction level in dental-phobic patients with implant-supported rehabilitation performed under general anaesthesia: a prospective study Sidenö, Louise Hmaidouch, Rim Brandt, Jan von Krockow, Nadine Weigl, Paul BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Phobic patients avoid dental treatment impairing their oral health and making it challenging to offer them prosthetic rehabilitation. This study evaluated patients’ experience of implant-supported prosthetic treatment after implantation performed under general anaesthesia due to dental phobia and severe pharyngeal reflexes (SPR). The effect of gender, age and location of implantation on patient satisfaction was tested. METHODS: Two hundred five patients underwent implantation under general anesthesia both in maxilla and mandible, respectively. After a trans-gingival healing period of 6–8 weeks, fixed implant bridges were inserted. Patients completed oral health impact profile questionnaire (OHIP-14). An additional set of six special questions was also developed and considered. Analysis of the OHIP-14 total score was made using logistics regression. Wald chi-square test was used to analyse the effect of age, gender and location of implantation. Effect sizes were estimated as odds-ratios and associated 95% Wald confidence intervals. RESULTS: Eighty two of 205 patients were included after prosthetic treatment. After start, 38 patients were excluded (4 died and 34 couldn’t be reached). OHIP-14-analyses were made by 43 patients (30–90 years). 67% of patients were totally satisfied with the whole implant rehabilitation (scoring 0). Mean of total score was 2.5. Only age affected significantly (p = 0.014) patients satisfaction. The obtained data indicate that younger patients (30–64 years) especially women are less satisfied (4.95) than older patients (0.3) for age group (65–90 years).Special questions’ data showed that 94.5% were satisfied with their treatment. 77.3% continued regular check-up after treatment and 96.9% would undergo the same treatment again. 95.5% would recommend implants to a friend of colleague. CONCLUSION: Gender and location of implantation have no significant influence on patient satisfaction. Younger patients especially women are less satisfied than older patients. Phobic patients are totally satisfied with implant rehabilitation under general anaesthesia which means that this treatment can be considered as a treatment of choice giving these patients the same opportunity like others to improve their oral health and well-being. BioMed Central 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6211469/ /pubmed/30382830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0644-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sidenö, Louise
Hmaidouch, Rim
Brandt, Jan
von Krockow, Nadine
Weigl, Paul
Satisfaction level in dental-phobic patients with implant-supported rehabilitation performed under general anaesthesia: a prospective study
title Satisfaction level in dental-phobic patients with implant-supported rehabilitation performed under general anaesthesia: a prospective study
title_full Satisfaction level in dental-phobic patients with implant-supported rehabilitation performed under general anaesthesia: a prospective study
title_fullStr Satisfaction level in dental-phobic patients with implant-supported rehabilitation performed under general anaesthesia: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Satisfaction level in dental-phobic patients with implant-supported rehabilitation performed under general anaesthesia: a prospective study
title_short Satisfaction level in dental-phobic patients with implant-supported rehabilitation performed under general anaesthesia: a prospective study
title_sort satisfaction level in dental-phobic patients with implant-supported rehabilitation performed under general anaesthesia: a prospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30382830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0644-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sidenolouise satisfactionlevelindentalphobicpatientswithimplantsupportedrehabilitationperformedundergeneralanaesthesiaaprospectivestudy
AT hmaidouchrim satisfactionlevelindentalphobicpatientswithimplantsupportedrehabilitationperformedundergeneralanaesthesiaaprospectivestudy
AT brandtjan satisfactionlevelindentalphobicpatientswithimplantsupportedrehabilitationperformedundergeneralanaesthesiaaprospectivestudy
AT vonkrockownadine satisfactionlevelindentalphobicpatientswithimplantsupportedrehabilitationperformedundergeneralanaesthesiaaprospectivestudy
AT weiglpaul satisfactionlevelindentalphobicpatientswithimplantsupportedrehabilitationperformedundergeneralanaesthesiaaprospectivestudy