Cargando…

Cross-sectional survey evaluating blood pressure control ACHIEVEment in hypertensive patients treated with multiple anti-hypertensive agents in Belgium and Luxembourg

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the actual blood pressure control rate and its estimation by general practitioners, the use of single-pill or free combinations, and the attitude towards single-pill combinations in primary care. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational survey in primary care between Ja...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leeman, Marc, Dramaix, Michèle, Van Nieuwenhuyse, Bregt, Thomas, Josse R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30383839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206510
_version_ 1783367388856582144
author Leeman, Marc
Dramaix, Michèle
Van Nieuwenhuyse, Bregt
Thomas, Josse R.
author_facet Leeman, Marc
Dramaix, Michèle
Van Nieuwenhuyse, Bregt
Thomas, Josse R.
author_sort Leeman, Marc
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the actual blood pressure control rate and its estimation by general practitioners, the use of single-pill or free combinations, and the attitude towards single-pill combinations in primary care. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational survey in primary care between January 2015 and September 2016 in Belgium and Luxembourg. The participating general practitioners enrolled hypertensive patients taking at least 2 antihypertensive molecules (as fixed or free associations). RESULTS: 742 general practitioners included a total of 8,006 patients, with a mean age of 66 ± 12 years. Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were respectively 141 ± 17 mmHg and 82 ± 10 mmHg (means ± SD). These patients had a blood pressure control rate of 45%, whereas it was estimated by general practitioners to be 60%. General practitioners with 11–25 years’ experience performed better than general practitioners with 36–51 years’ experience in the evaluation of blood pressure control. Combinations used were free in 39%, single-pill in 34% and mixed in 27% of the patients. Patients receiving single-pill combinations were younger than those treated with free combinations (63 ± 12 vs. 68 ± 12 years, p < 0.001), with fewer comorbidities (39 vs. 55%, p < 0.001). In patients treated solely with free pill associations, 66% of patient cases, general practitioners were willing to switch to a single-pill combination. The main reasons were improved adherence (76%) and better blood pressure control (64%). CONCLUSION: In patients requiring at least two antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure control rate remains low and is overestimated by general practitioners. Free combinations remain largely used although many general practitioners seem willing to shift to single-pill combinations. Treatment simplification could improve adherence and blood pressure control rate, which has been shown to lead to reduced morbidity and mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6211697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62116972018-11-19 Cross-sectional survey evaluating blood pressure control ACHIEVEment in hypertensive patients treated with multiple anti-hypertensive agents in Belgium and Luxembourg Leeman, Marc Dramaix, Michèle Van Nieuwenhuyse, Bregt Thomas, Josse R. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the actual blood pressure control rate and its estimation by general practitioners, the use of single-pill or free combinations, and the attitude towards single-pill combinations in primary care. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational survey in primary care between January 2015 and September 2016 in Belgium and Luxembourg. The participating general practitioners enrolled hypertensive patients taking at least 2 antihypertensive molecules (as fixed or free associations). RESULTS: 742 general practitioners included a total of 8,006 patients, with a mean age of 66 ± 12 years. Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were respectively 141 ± 17 mmHg and 82 ± 10 mmHg (means ± SD). These patients had a blood pressure control rate of 45%, whereas it was estimated by general practitioners to be 60%. General practitioners with 11–25 years’ experience performed better than general practitioners with 36–51 years’ experience in the evaluation of blood pressure control. Combinations used were free in 39%, single-pill in 34% and mixed in 27% of the patients. Patients receiving single-pill combinations were younger than those treated with free combinations (63 ± 12 vs. 68 ± 12 years, p < 0.001), with fewer comorbidities (39 vs. 55%, p < 0.001). In patients treated solely with free pill associations, 66% of patient cases, general practitioners were willing to switch to a single-pill combination. The main reasons were improved adherence (76%) and better blood pressure control (64%). CONCLUSION: In patients requiring at least two antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure control rate remains low and is overestimated by general practitioners. Free combinations remain largely used although many general practitioners seem willing to shift to single-pill combinations. Treatment simplification could improve adherence and blood pressure control rate, which has been shown to lead to reduced morbidity and mortality. Public Library of Science 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6211697/ /pubmed/30383839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206510 Text en © 2018 Leeman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leeman, Marc
Dramaix, Michèle
Van Nieuwenhuyse, Bregt
Thomas, Josse R.
Cross-sectional survey evaluating blood pressure control ACHIEVEment in hypertensive patients treated with multiple anti-hypertensive agents in Belgium and Luxembourg
title Cross-sectional survey evaluating blood pressure control ACHIEVEment in hypertensive patients treated with multiple anti-hypertensive agents in Belgium and Luxembourg
title_full Cross-sectional survey evaluating blood pressure control ACHIEVEment in hypertensive patients treated with multiple anti-hypertensive agents in Belgium and Luxembourg
title_fullStr Cross-sectional survey evaluating blood pressure control ACHIEVEment in hypertensive patients treated with multiple anti-hypertensive agents in Belgium and Luxembourg
title_full_unstemmed Cross-sectional survey evaluating blood pressure control ACHIEVEment in hypertensive patients treated with multiple anti-hypertensive agents in Belgium and Luxembourg
title_short Cross-sectional survey evaluating blood pressure control ACHIEVEment in hypertensive patients treated with multiple anti-hypertensive agents in Belgium and Luxembourg
title_sort cross-sectional survey evaluating blood pressure control achievement in hypertensive patients treated with multiple anti-hypertensive agents in belgium and luxembourg
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30383839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206510
work_keys_str_mv AT leemanmarc crosssectionalsurveyevaluatingbloodpressurecontrolachievementinhypertensivepatientstreatedwithmultipleantihypertensiveagentsinbelgiumandluxembourg
AT dramaixmichele crosssectionalsurveyevaluatingbloodpressurecontrolachievementinhypertensivepatientstreatedwithmultipleantihypertensiveagentsinbelgiumandluxembourg
AT vannieuwenhuysebregt crosssectionalsurveyevaluatingbloodpressurecontrolachievementinhypertensivepatientstreatedwithmultipleantihypertensiveagentsinbelgiumandluxembourg
AT thomasjosser crosssectionalsurveyevaluatingbloodpressurecontrolachievementinhypertensivepatientstreatedwithmultipleantihypertensiveagentsinbelgiumandluxembourg