Cargando…

Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments

BACKGROUND: The performance of dental implants in controlled clinical studies is often investigated in homogenous populations. Observational studies are necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant restorations placed in real-life situations, according to standard practice, and to assess the needs o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beschnidt, Sven Marcus, Cacaci, Claudio, Dedeoglu, Kerem, Hildebrand, Detlef, Hulla, Helfried, Iglhaut, Gerhard, Krennmair, Gerald, Schlee, Markus, Sipos, Paul, Stricker, Andres, Ackermann, Karl-Ludwig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0145-3
_version_ 1783367526432899072
author Beschnidt, Sven Marcus
Cacaci, Claudio
Dedeoglu, Kerem
Hildebrand, Detlef
Hulla, Helfried
Iglhaut, Gerhard
Krennmair, Gerald
Schlee, Markus
Sipos, Paul
Stricker, Andres
Ackermann, Karl-Ludwig
author_facet Beschnidt, Sven Marcus
Cacaci, Claudio
Dedeoglu, Kerem
Hildebrand, Detlef
Hulla, Helfried
Iglhaut, Gerhard
Krennmair, Gerald
Schlee, Markus
Sipos, Paul
Stricker, Andres
Ackermann, Karl-Ludwig
author_sort Beschnidt, Sven Marcus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The performance of dental implants in controlled clinical studies is often investigated in homogenous populations. Observational studies are necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant restorations placed in real-life situations, according to standard practice, and to assess the needs of the patients. The aim of this non-interventional study was to reveal the survival, success, and general performance of CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants and their restorations in daily dental practice. METHODS: Seventeen private practices across five countries participated in this prospective multicenter study. Patients received implants in the maxilla and mandible which were restored either with platform-matching or platform-switching abutments. Patients were followed-up for up to 5 years post-loading. Radiographs and clinical parameters were evaluated and patient satisfaction was evaluated. RESULTS: From a total of 196 patients planned, 185 patients with 271 implants were restored with abutments and fulfilled the follow-up inclusion criteria. Three implant failures were recorded, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 98.6% after 5 years post-loading. One persistent complication of peri-implantitis occurred. The soft tissue health remained stable, and the papilla height improved after loading. At 5-year follow-up, the mean crestal bone loss was − 0.28 ± 0.60 mm; over 99% of patients reported satisfaction with the restoration as excellent or good. CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed and restored with both platform-matching and platform-switching abutments in daily dental private practice achieved excellent clinical outcomes with highly satisfied patients after 5 years of function, confirming the results obtained in well-controlled clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6212375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62123752018-11-13 Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments Beschnidt, Sven Marcus Cacaci, Claudio Dedeoglu, Kerem Hildebrand, Detlef Hulla, Helfried Iglhaut, Gerhard Krennmair, Gerald Schlee, Markus Sipos, Paul Stricker, Andres Ackermann, Karl-Ludwig Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: The performance of dental implants in controlled clinical studies is often investigated in homogenous populations. Observational studies are necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant restorations placed in real-life situations, according to standard practice, and to assess the needs of the patients. The aim of this non-interventional study was to reveal the survival, success, and general performance of CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants and their restorations in daily dental practice. METHODS: Seventeen private practices across five countries participated in this prospective multicenter study. Patients received implants in the maxilla and mandible which were restored either with platform-matching or platform-switching abutments. Patients were followed-up for up to 5 years post-loading. Radiographs and clinical parameters were evaluated and patient satisfaction was evaluated. RESULTS: From a total of 196 patients planned, 185 patients with 271 implants were restored with abutments and fulfilled the follow-up inclusion criteria. Three implant failures were recorded, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 98.6% after 5 years post-loading. One persistent complication of peri-implantitis occurred. The soft tissue health remained stable, and the papilla height improved after loading. At 5-year follow-up, the mean crestal bone loss was − 0.28 ± 0.60 mm; over 99% of patients reported satisfaction with the restoration as excellent or good. CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed and restored with both platform-matching and platform-switching abutments in daily dental private practice achieved excellent clinical outcomes with highly satisfied patients after 5 years of function, confirming the results obtained in well-controlled clinical trials. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6212375/ /pubmed/30386925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0145-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Beschnidt, Sven Marcus
Cacaci, Claudio
Dedeoglu, Kerem
Hildebrand, Detlef
Hulla, Helfried
Iglhaut, Gerhard
Krennmair, Gerald
Schlee, Markus
Sipos, Paul
Stricker, Andres
Ackermann, Karl-Ludwig
Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments
title Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments
title_full Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments
title_fullStr Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments
title_full_unstemmed Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments
title_short Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments
title_sort implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using camlog screw-line implants with or without platform-switching abutments
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0145-3
work_keys_str_mv AT beschnidtsvenmarcus implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments
AT cacaciclaudio implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments
AT dedeoglukerem implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments
AT hildebranddetlef implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments
AT hullahelfried implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments
AT iglhautgerhard implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments
AT krennmairgerald implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments
AT schleemarkus implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments
AT sipospaul implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments
AT strickerandres implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments
AT ackermannkarlludwig implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments