Cargando…
Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments
BACKGROUND: The performance of dental implants in controlled clinical studies is often investigated in homogenous populations. Observational studies are necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant restorations placed in real-life situations, according to standard practice, and to assess the needs o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0145-3 |
_version_ | 1783367526432899072 |
---|---|
author | Beschnidt, Sven Marcus Cacaci, Claudio Dedeoglu, Kerem Hildebrand, Detlef Hulla, Helfried Iglhaut, Gerhard Krennmair, Gerald Schlee, Markus Sipos, Paul Stricker, Andres Ackermann, Karl-Ludwig |
author_facet | Beschnidt, Sven Marcus Cacaci, Claudio Dedeoglu, Kerem Hildebrand, Detlef Hulla, Helfried Iglhaut, Gerhard Krennmair, Gerald Schlee, Markus Sipos, Paul Stricker, Andres Ackermann, Karl-Ludwig |
author_sort | Beschnidt, Sven Marcus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The performance of dental implants in controlled clinical studies is often investigated in homogenous populations. Observational studies are necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant restorations placed in real-life situations, according to standard practice, and to assess the needs of the patients. The aim of this non-interventional study was to reveal the survival, success, and general performance of CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants and their restorations in daily dental practice. METHODS: Seventeen private practices across five countries participated in this prospective multicenter study. Patients received implants in the maxilla and mandible which were restored either with platform-matching or platform-switching abutments. Patients were followed-up for up to 5 years post-loading. Radiographs and clinical parameters were evaluated and patient satisfaction was evaluated. RESULTS: From a total of 196 patients planned, 185 patients with 271 implants were restored with abutments and fulfilled the follow-up inclusion criteria. Three implant failures were recorded, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 98.6% after 5 years post-loading. One persistent complication of peri-implantitis occurred. The soft tissue health remained stable, and the papilla height improved after loading. At 5-year follow-up, the mean crestal bone loss was − 0.28 ± 0.60 mm; over 99% of patients reported satisfaction with the restoration as excellent or good. CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed and restored with both platform-matching and platform-switching abutments in daily dental private practice achieved excellent clinical outcomes with highly satisfied patients after 5 years of function, confirming the results obtained in well-controlled clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6212375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62123752018-11-13 Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments Beschnidt, Sven Marcus Cacaci, Claudio Dedeoglu, Kerem Hildebrand, Detlef Hulla, Helfried Iglhaut, Gerhard Krennmair, Gerald Schlee, Markus Sipos, Paul Stricker, Andres Ackermann, Karl-Ludwig Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: The performance of dental implants in controlled clinical studies is often investigated in homogenous populations. Observational studies are necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant restorations placed in real-life situations, according to standard practice, and to assess the needs of the patients. The aim of this non-interventional study was to reveal the survival, success, and general performance of CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants and their restorations in daily dental practice. METHODS: Seventeen private practices across five countries participated in this prospective multicenter study. Patients received implants in the maxilla and mandible which were restored either with platform-matching or platform-switching abutments. Patients were followed-up for up to 5 years post-loading. Radiographs and clinical parameters were evaluated and patient satisfaction was evaluated. RESULTS: From a total of 196 patients planned, 185 patients with 271 implants were restored with abutments and fulfilled the follow-up inclusion criteria. Three implant failures were recorded, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 98.6% after 5 years post-loading. One persistent complication of peri-implantitis occurred. The soft tissue health remained stable, and the papilla height improved after loading. At 5-year follow-up, the mean crestal bone loss was − 0.28 ± 0.60 mm; over 99% of patients reported satisfaction with the restoration as excellent or good. CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed and restored with both platform-matching and platform-switching abutments in daily dental private practice achieved excellent clinical outcomes with highly satisfied patients after 5 years of function, confirming the results obtained in well-controlled clinical trials. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6212375/ /pubmed/30386925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0145-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Beschnidt, Sven Marcus Cacaci, Claudio Dedeoglu, Kerem Hildebrand, Detlef Hulla, Helfried Iglhaut, Gerhard Krennmair, Gerald Schlee, Markus Sipos, Paul Stricker, Andres Ackermann, Karl-Ludwig Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments |
title | Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments |
title_full | Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments |
title_fullStr | Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments |
title_full_unstemmed | Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments |
title_short | Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments |
title_sort | implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using camlog screw-line implants with or without platform-switching abutments |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0145-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beschnidtsvenmarcus implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments AT cacaciclaudio implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments AT dedeoglukerem implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments AT hildebranddetlef implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments AT hullahelfried implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments AT iglhautgerhard implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments AT krennmairgerald implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments AT schleemarkus implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments AT sipospaul implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments AT strickerandres implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments AT ackermannkarlludwig implantsuccessandsurvivalratesindailydentalpractice5yearresultsofanoninterventionalstudyusingcamlogscrewlineimplantswithorwithoutplatformswitchingabutments |