Cargando…

The physics of radioembolization

Radioembolization is an established treatment for chemoresistant and unresectable liver cancers. Currently, treatment planning is often based on semi-empirical methods, which yield acceptable toxicity profiles and have enabled the large-scale application in a palliative setting. However, recently, f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bastiaannet, Remco, Kappadath, S. Cheenu, Kunnen, Britt, Braat, Arthur J. A. T., Lam, Marnix G. E. H., de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0221-z
_version_ 1783367526898466816
author Bastiaannet, Remco
Kappadath, S. Cheenu
Kunnen, Britt
Braat, Arthur J. A. T.
Lam, Marnix G. E. H.
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
author_facet Bastiaannet, Remco
Kappadath, S. Cheenu
Kunnen, Britt
Braat, Arthur J. A. T.
Lam, Marnix G. E. H.
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
author_sort Bastiaannet, Remco
collection PubMed
description Radioembolization is an established treatment for chemoresistant and unresectable liver cancers. Currently, treatment planning is often based on semi-empirical methods, which yield acceptable toxicity profiles and have enabled the large-scale application in a palliative setting. However, recently, five large randomized controlled trials using resin microspheres failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in either progression-free survival or overall survival in both hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer. One reason for this might be that the activity prescription methods used in these studies are suboptimal for many patients. In this review, the current dosimetric methods and their caveats are evaluated. Furthermore, the current state-of-the-art of image-guided dosimetry and advanced radiobiological modeling is reviewed from a physics’ perspective. The current literature is explored for the observation of robust dose-response relationships followed by an overview of recent advancements in quantitative image reconstruction in relation to image-guided dosimetry. This review is concluded with a discussion on areas where further research is necessary in order to arrive at a personalized treatment method that provides optimal tumor control and is clinically feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6212377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62123772018-11-13 The physics of radioembolization Bastiaannet, Remco Kappadath, S. Cheenu Kunnen, Britt Braat, Arthur J. A. T. Lam, Marnix G. E. H. de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. EJNMMI Phys Review Radioembolization is an established treatment for chemoresistant and unresectable liver cancers. Currently, treatment planning is often based on semi-empirical methods, which yield acceptable toxicity profiles and have enabled the large-scale application in a palliative setting. However, recently, five large randomized controlled trials using resin microspheres failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in either progression-free survival or overall survival in both hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer. One reason for this might be that the activity prescription methods used in these studies are suboptimal for many patients. In this review, the current dosimetric methods and their caveats are evaluated. Furthermore, the current state-of-the-art of image-guided dosimetry and advanced radiobiological modeling is reviewed from a physics’ perspective. The current literature is explored for the observation of robust dose-response relationships followed by an overview of recent advancements in quantitative image reconstruction in relation to image-guided dosimetry. This review is concluded with a discussion on areas where further research is necessary in order to arrive at a personalized treatment method that provides optimal tumor control and is clinically feasible. Springer International Publishing 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6212377/ /pubmed/30386924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0221-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Bastiaannet, Remco
Kappadath, S. Cheenu
Kunnen, Britt
Braat, Arthur J. A. T.
Lam, Marnix G. E. H.
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
The physics of radioembolization
title The physics of radioembolization
title_full The physics of radioembolization
title_fullStr The physics of radioembolization
title_full_unstemmed The physics of radioembolization
title_short The physics of radioembolization
title_sort physics of radioembolization
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0221-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bastiaannetremco thephysicsofradioembolization
AT kappadathscheenu thephysicsofradioembolization
AT kunnenbritt thephysicsofradioembolization
AT braatarthurjat thephysicsofradioembolization
AT lammarnixgeh thephysicsofradioembolization
AT dejonghugowam thephysicsofradioembolization
AT bastiaannetremco physicsofradioembolization
AT kappadathscheenu physicsofradioembolization
AT kunnenbritt physicsofradioembolization
AT braatarthurjat physicsofradioembolization
AT lammarnixgeh physicsofradioembolization
AT dejonghugowam physicsofradioembolization