Cargando…
The physics of radioembolization
Radioembolization is an established treatment for chemoresistant and unresectable liver cancers. Currently, treatment planning is often based on semi-empirical methods, which yield acceptable toxicity profiles and have enabled the large-scale application in a palliative setting. However, recently, f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0221-z |
_version_ | 1783367526898466816 |
---|---|
author | Bastiaannet, Remco Kappadath, S. Cheenu Kunnen, Britt Braat, Arthur J. A. T. Lam, Marnix G. E. H. de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. |
author_facet | Bastiaannet, Remco Kappadath, S. Cheenu Kunnen, Britt Braat, Arthur J. A. T. Lam, Marnix G. E. H. de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. |
author_sort | Bastiaannet, Remco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radioembolization is an established treatment for chemoresistant and unresectable liver cancers. Currently, treatment planning is often based on semi-empirical methods, which yield acceptable toxicity profiles and have enabled the large-scale application in a palliative setting. However, recently, five large randomized controlled trials using resin microspheres failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in either progression-free survival or overall survival in both hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer. One reason for this might be that the activity prescription methods used in these studies are suboptimal for many patients. In this review, the current dosimetric methods and their caveats are evaluated. Furthermore, the current state-of-the-art of image-guided dosimetry and advanced radiobiological modeling is reviewed from a physics’ perspective. The current literature is explored for the observation of robust dose-response relationships followed by an overview of recent advancements in quantitative image reconstruction in relation to image-guided dosimetry. This review is concluded with a discussion on areas where further research is necessary in order to arrive at a personalized treatment method that provides optimal tumor control and is clinically feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6212377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62123772018-11-13 The physics of radioembolization Bastiaannet, Remco Kappadath, S. Cheenu Kunnen, Britt Braat, Arthur J. A. T. Lam, Marnix G. E. H. de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. EJNMMI Phys Review Radioembolization is an established treatment for chemoresistant and unresectable liver cancers. Currently, treatment planning is often based on semi-empirical methods, which yield acceptable toxicity profiles and have enabled the large-scale application in a palliative setting. However, recently, five large randomized controlled trials using resin microspheres failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in either progression-free survival or overall survival in both hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer. One reason for this might be that the activity prescription methods used in these studies are suboptimal for many patients. In this review, the current dosimetric methods and their caveats are evaluated. Furthermore, the current state-of-the-art of image-guided dosimetry and advanced radiobiological modeling is reviewed from a physics’ perspective. The current literature is explored for the observation of robust dose-response relationships followed by an overview of recent advancements in quantitative image reconstruction in relation to image-guided dosimetry. This review is concluded with a discussion on areas where further research is necessary in order to arrive at a personalized treatment method that provides optimal tumor control and is clinically feasible. Springer International Publishing 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6212377/ /pubmed/30386924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0221-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Bastiaannet, Remco Kappadath, S. Cheenu Kunnen, Britt Braat, Arthur J. A. T. Lam, Marnix G. E. H. de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. The physics of radioembolization |
title | The physics of radioembolization |
title_full | The physics of radioembolization |
title_fullStr | The physics of radioembolization |
title_full_unstemmed | The physics of radioembolization |
title_short | The physics of radioembolization |
title_sort | physics of radioembolization |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0221-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bastiaannetremco thephysicsofradioembolization AT kappadathscheenu thephysicsofradioembolization AT kunnenbritt thephysicsofradioembolization AT braatarthurjat thephysicsofradioembolization AT lammarnixgeh thephysicsofradioembolization AT dejonghugowam thephysicsofradioembolization AT bastiaannetremco physicsofradioembolization AT kappadathscheenu physicsofradioembolization AT kunnenbritt physicsofradioembolization AT braatarthurjat physicsofradioembolization AT lammarnixgeh physicsofradioembolization AT dejonghugowam physicsofradioembolization |