Cargando…

Manifold Routes to a Nucleus

It is widely assumed that there is a clear distinction between eukaryotes, with cell nuclei, and prokaryotes, which lack nuclei. This suggests the evolution of nuclear compartmentation is a singular event. However, emerging knowledge of the diversity of bacterial internal cell structures suggests th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hendrickson, Heather L., Poole, Anthony M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30416499
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02604
_version_ 1783367542631301120
author Hendrickson, Heather L.
Poole, Anthony M.
author_facet Hendrickson, Heather L.
Poole, Anthony M.
author_sort Hendrickson, Heather L.
collection PubMed
description It is widely assumed that there is a clear distinction between eukaryotes, with cell nuclei, and prokaryotes, which lack nuclei. This suggests the evolution of nuclear compartmentation is a singular event. However, emerging knowledge of the diversity of bacterial internal cell structures suggests the picture may not be as black-and-white as previously thought. For instance, some members of the bacterial PVC superphylum appear to have nucleus-like compartmentation, where transcription and translation are physically separated, and some jumbophages have recently been shown to create nucleus-like structures within their Pseudomonad hosts. Moreover, there is also tantalizing metagenomic identification of new Archaea that carry homologs of genes associated with internal cell membrane structure in eukaryotes. All these cases invite comparison with eukaryote cell biology. While the bacterial cases of genetic compartmentation are likely convergent, and thus viewed by many as not germane to the question of eukaryote origins, we argue here that, in addressing the broader question of the evolution of compartmentation, other instances are at least as important: they provide us with a point of comparison which is critical for a more general understanding of both the conditions favoring the emergence of intracellular compartmentation of DNA and the evolutionary consequences of such cellular architecture. Finally, we consider three classes of explanation for the emergence of compartmentation: physical protection, crosstalk avoidance and nonadaptive origins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6212462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62124622018-11-09 Manifold Routes to a Nucleus Hendrickson, Heather L. Poole, Anthony M. Front Microbiol Microbiology It is widely assumed that there is a clear distinction between eukaryotes, with cell nuclei, and prokaryotes, which lack nuclei. This suggests the evolution of nuclear compartmentation is a singular event. However, emerging knowledge of the diversity of bacterial internal cell structures suggests the picture may not be as black-and-white as previously thought. For instance, some members of the bacterial PVC superphylum appear to have nucleus-like compartmentation, where transcription and translation are physically separated, and some jumbophages have recently been shown to create nucleus-like structures within their Pseudomonad hosts. Moreover, there is also tantalizing metagenomic identification of new Archaea that carry homologs of genes associated with internal cell membrane structure in eukaryotes. All these cases invite comparison with eukaryote cell biology. While the bacterial cases of genetic compartmentation are likely convergent, and thus viewed by many as not germane to the question of eukaryote origins, we argue here that, in addressing the broader question of the evolution of compartmentation, other instances are at least as important: they provide us with a point of comparison which is critical for a more general understanding of both the conditions favoring the emergence of intracellular compartmentation of DNA and the evolutionary consequences of such cellular architecture. Finally, we consider three classes of explanation for the emergence of compartmentation: physical protection, crosstalk avoidance and nonadaptive origins. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6212462/ /pubmed/30416499 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02604 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hendrickson and Poole. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Hendrickson, Heather L.
Poole, Anthony M.
Manifold Routes to a Nucleus
title Manifold Routes to a Nucleus
title_full Manifold Routes to a Nucleus
title_fullStr Manifold Routes to a Nucleus
title_full_unstemmed Manifold Routes to a Nucleus
title_short Manifold Routes to a Nucleus
title_sort manifold routes to a nucleus
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30416499
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02604
work_keys_str_mv AT hendricksonheatherl manifoldroutestoanucleus
AT pooleanthonym manifoldroutestoanucleus