Cargando…
Effects of different creep feed types on pre-weaning and post-weaning performance and gut development
OBJECTIVE: This experiment was carried out to determine the effects of different creep feed types on suckling performance and further adjustments to solid feed after weaning. METHODS: A total of 24 multiparous sows and their litters were allotted to one of three treatment groups: i) provided highly...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30380814 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0844 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: This experiment was carried out to determine the effects of different creep feed types on suckling performance and further adjustments to solid feed after weaning. METHODS: A total of 24 multiparous sows and their litters were allotted to one of three treatment groups: i) provided highly digestible creep feed (Creep), ii) provided a pig weaning diet (Weaner), and iii) provided sow feed (Sow) as creep feed until weaning. After weaning, a total of 96 piglets were selected for evaluation of post-weaning performance. RESULTS: For pre-weaning performance, the Creep treatment led to a significantly higher feed intake from 14 to 28 d (p<0.05) and higher body weight gain from 21 to 28 d than piglets that were provided other diets. However, after weaning, the Weaner treatment yielded a significantly higher feed intake and average daily gain than other treatments from 0 to 14 d after weaning (p<0.05); Creep treatment tended to generate lower villus heights in the duodenum than the other treatments (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Highly digestible creep feed improved pre-weaning performance, but feed familiarity and grain-based creep feed improved post-weaning performance. |
---|