Cargando…

Effect of direct-fed microbials on culturable gut microbiotas in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis of controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the overall effect of direct-fed microbial (DFM) or probiotic supplementation on the log concentrations of culturable gut microbiota in broiler chickens. METHODS: Relevant studies were collected from PubMed, SCOPUS, Poultry Science Journal, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heak, Chhaiden, Sukon, Peerapol, Sornplang, Pairat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879823
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0009
_version_ 1783367613676519424
author Heak, Chhaiden
Sukon, Peerapol
Sornplang, Pairat
author_facet Heak, Chhaiden
Sukon, Peerapol
Sornplang, Pairat
author_sort Heak, Chhaiden
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the overall effect of direct-fed microbial (DFM) or probiotic supplementation on the log concentrations of culturable gut microbiota in broiler chickens. METHODS: Relevant studies were collected from PubMed, SCOPUS, Poultry Science Journal, and Google Scholar. The studies included controlled trials using DFM supplementation in broiler chickens and reporting log concentrations of the culturable gut microbiota. The overall effect of DFM supplementation was determined using standardized mean difference (SMD) with a random-effects model. Subgroups were analyzed to identify pre-specified characteristics possibly associated with the heterogeneity of the results. Risk of bias and publication bias were assessed. RESULTS: Eighteen taxa of the culturable gut microbiota were identified from 42 studies. The overall effect of DFM supplementation on the log concentrations of all 18 taxa did not differ significantly from the controls (SMD = −0.06, 95% confidence interval [−0.16, 0.04], p = 0.228, I(2) = 85%, n = 699 comparisons), but the 18 taxa could be further classified into three categories by the direction of the effect size: taxa whose log concentrations did not differ significantly from the controls (category 1), taxa whose log concentrations increased significantly with DFM supplementation (category 2), and taxa whose log concentrations decreased significantly with DFM supplementation (category 3). Category 1 comprised nine taxa, including total bacterial counts. Category 2 comprised four taxa: Bacillus, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium butyricum, and Lactobacillus. Category 3 comprised five taxa: Clostridium perfringens, coliforms, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, and Salmonella. Some characteristics identified by the subgroup analysis were associated with result heterogeneity. Most studies, however, were present with unclear risk of bias. Publication bias was also identified. CONCLUSION: DFM supplementation increased the concentrations of some beneficial bacteria (e.g. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) and decreased those of some detrimental bacteria (e.g. Clostridium perfringens and Salmonella) in the guts of broiler chickens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6212764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62127642018-11-07 Effect of direct-fed microbials on culturable gut microbiotas in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis of controlled trials Heak, Chhaiden Sukon, Peerapol Sornplang, Pairat Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the overall effect of direct-fed microbial (DFM) or probiotic supplementation on the log concentrations of culturable gut microbiota in broiler chickens. METHODS: Relevant studies were collected from PubMed, SCOPUS, Poultry Science Journal, and Google Scholar. The studies included controlled trials using DFM supplementation in broiler chickens and reporting log concentrations of the culturable gut microbiota. The overall effect of DFM supplementation was determined using standardized mean difference (SMD) with a random-effects model. Subgroups were analyzed to identify pre-specified characteristics possibly associated with the heterogeneity of the results. Risk of bias and publication bias were assessed. RESULTS: Eighteen taxa of the culturable gut microbiota were identified from 42 studies. The overall effect of DFM supplementation on the log concentrations of all 18 taxa did not differ significantly from the controls (SMD = −0.06, 95% confidence interval [−0.16, 0.04], p = 0.228, I(2) = 85%, n = 699 comparisons), but the 18 taxa could be further classified into three categories by the direction of the effect size: taxa whose log concentrations did not differ significantly from the controls (category 1), taxa whose log concentrations increased significantly with DFM supplementation (category 2), and taxa whose log concentrations decreased significantly with DFM supplementation (category 3). Category 1 comprised nine taxa, including total bacterial counts. Category 2 comprised four taxa: Bacillus, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium butyricum, and Lactobacillus. Category 3 comprised five taxa: Clostridium perfringens, coliforms, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, and Salmonella. Some characteristics identified by the subgroup analysis were associated with result heterogeneity. Most studies, however, were present with unclear risk of bias. Publication bias was also identified. CONCLUSION: DFM supplementation increased the concentrations of some beneficial bacteria (e.g. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) and decreased those of some detrimental bacteria (e.g. Clostridium perfringens and Salmonella) in the guts of broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2018-11 2018-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6212764/ /pubmed/29879823 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0009 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Heak, Chhaiden
Sukon, Peerapol
Sornplang, Pairat
Effect of direct-fed microbials on culturable gut microbiotas in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
title Effect of direct-fed microbials on culturable gut microbiotas in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
title_full Effect of direct-fed microbials on culturable gut microbiotas in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
title_fullStr Effect of direct-fed microbials on culturable gut microbiotas in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effect of direct-fed microbials on culturable gut microbiotas in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
title_short Effect of direct-fed microbials on culturable gut microbiotas in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
title_sort effect of direct-fed microbials on culturable gut microbiotas in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879823
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0009
work_keys_str_mv AT heakchhaiden effectofdirectfedmicrobialsonculturablegutmicrobiotasinbroilerchickensametaanalysisofcontrolledtrials
AT sukonpeerapol effectofdirectfedmicrobialsonculturablegutmicrobiotasinbroilerchickensametaanalysisofcontrolledtrials
AT sornplangpairat effectofdirectfedmicrobialsonculturablegutmicrobiotasinbroilerchickensametaanalysisofcontrolledtrials