Cargando…
Reactivation of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus: A Comparison after Exposure to Gamma, Proton, Carbon, and Iron Radiation
Among the many stressors astronauts are exposed to during spaceflight, cosmic radiation may lead to various serious health effects. Specifically, space radiation may contribute to decreased immunity, which has been documented in astronauts during short- and long-duration missions, as evidenced by se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274169 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102961 |
_version_ | 1783367672296112128 |
---|---|
author | Mehta, Satish K. Bloom, David C. Plante, Ianik Stowe, Raymond Feiveson, Alan H. Renner, Ashlie Dhummakupt, Adit Markan, Dhruv Zhang, Ye Wu, Honglu Scoles, Blaire Cohen, Jeffrey I. Crucian, Brian Pierson, Duane L. |
author_facet | Mehta, Satish K. Bloom, David C. Plante, Ianik Stowe, Raymond Feiveson, Alan H. Renner, Ashlie Dhummakupt, Adit Markan, Dhruv Zhang, Ye Wu, Honglu Scoles, Blaire Cohen, Jeffrey I. Crucian, Brian Pierson, Duane L. |
author_sort | Mehta, Satish K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Among the many stressors astronauts are exposed to during spaceflight, cosmic radiation may lead to various serious health effects. Specifically, space radiation may contribute to decreased immunity, which has been documented in astronauts during short- and long-duration missions, as evidenced by several changes in cellular immunity and plasma cytokine levels. Reactivation of latent herpes viruses, either directly from radiation of latently infected cells and/or from perturbation of the immune system, may result in disease in astronauts. Epstein‒Barr virus (EBV) is one of the eight human herpes viruses known to infect more than 90% of human adults and persists for the life of the host without normally causing adverse effects. Reactivation of several latent viruses in astronauts is well documented, although the mechanism of reactivation is not well understood. We studied the effect of four different types of radiation, (1) (137)Cs gamma rays, (2) 150-MeV protons, (3) 600 MeV/n carbon ions, and (4) 600 MeV/n iron ions on the activation of lytic gene transcription and of reactivation of EBV in a latently infected cell line (Akata) at doses of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 Gy. The data showed that for all doses used in this study, lytic gene transcription was induced and median viral loads were significantly higher for all types of radiation than in corresponding control samples, with the increases detected as early as four days post-exposure and generally tapering off at later time points. The viability and size of EBV-infected Akata cells were highly variable and exhibited approximately the same trend in time for all radiation types at 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 Gy. This work shows that reactivation of viruses can occur due to the effect of different types of radiation on latently infected cells in the absence of changes or cytokines produced in the immune system. In general, gamma rays are more effective than protons, carbon ions, and iron ions in inducing latent virus reactivation, though these high-energy particles did induce more sustained and later reactivation of EBV lytic gene transcription. These findings also challenge the common relative biological effectiveness concept that is often used in radiobiology for other end points. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6213004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62130042018-11-14 Reactivation of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus: A Comparison after Exposure to Gamma, Proton, Carbon, and Iron Radiation Mehta, Satish K. Bloom, David C. Plante, Ianik Stowe, Raymond Feiveson, Alan H. Renner, Ashlie Dhummakupt, Adit Markan, Dhruv Zhang, Ye Wu, Honglu Scoles, Blaire Cohen, Jeffrey I. Crucian, Brian Pierson, Duane L. Int J Mol Sci Article Among the many stressors astronauts are exposed to during spaceflight, cosmic radiation may lead to various serious health effects. Specifically, space radiation may contribute to decreased immunity, which has been documented in astronauts during short- and long-duration missions, as evidenced by several changes in cellular immunity and plasma cytokine levels. Reactivation of latent herpes viruses, either directly from radiation of latently infected cells and/or from perturbation of the immune system, may result in disease in astronauts. Epstein‒Barr virus (EBV) is one of the eight human herpes viruses known to infect more than 90% of human adults and persists for the life of the host without normally causing adverse effects. Reactivation of several latent viruses in astronauts is well documented, although the mechanism of reactivation is not well understood. We studied the effect of four different types of radiation, (1) (137)Cs gamma rays, (2) 150-MeV protons, (3) 600 MeV/n carbon ions, and (4) 600 MeV/n iron ions on the activation of lytic gene transcription and of reactivation of EBV in a latently infected cell line (Akata) at doses of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 Gy. The data showed that for all doses used in this study, lytic gene transcription was induced and median viral loads were significantly higher for all types of radiation than in corresponding control samples, with the increases detected as early as four days post-exposure and generally tapering off at later time points. The viability and size of EBV-infected Akata cells were highly variable and exhibited approximately the same trend in time for all radiation types at 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 Gy. This work shows that reactivation of viruses can occur due to the effect of different types of radiation on latently infected cells in the absence of changes or cytokines produced in the immune system. In general, gamma rays are more effective than protons, carbon ions, and iron ions in inducing latent virus reactivation, though these high-energy particles did induce more sustained and later reactivation of EBV lytic gene transcription. These findings also challenge the common relative biological effectiveness concept that is often used in radiobiology for other end points. MDPI 2018-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6213004/ /pubmed/30274169 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102961 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mehta, Satish K. Bloom, David C. Plante, Ianik Stowe, Raymond Feiveson, Alan H. Renner, Ashlie Dhummakupt, Adit Markan, Dhruv Zhang, Ye Wu, Honglu Scoles, Blaire Cohen, Jeffrey I. Crucian, Brian Pierson, Duane L. Reactivation of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus: A Comparison after Exposure to Gamma, Proton, Carbon, and Iron Radiation |
title | Reactivation of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus: A Comparison after Exposure to Gamma, Proton, Carbon, and Iron Radiation |
title_full | Reactivation of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus: A Comparison after Exposure to Gamma, Proton, Carbon, and Iron Radiation |
title_fullStr | Reactivation of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus: A Comparison after Exposure to Gamma, Proton, Carbon, and Iron Radiation |
title_full_unstemmed | Reactivation of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus: A Comparison after Exposure to Gamma, Proton, Carbon, and Iron Radiation |
title_short | Reactivation of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus: A Comparison after Exposure to Gamma, Proton, Carbon, and Iron Radiation |
title_sort | reactivation of latent epstein-barr virus: a comparison after exposure to gamma, proton, carbon, and iron radiation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274169 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehtasatishk reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT bloomdavidc reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT planteianik reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT stoweraymond reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT feivesonalanh reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT rennerashlie reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT dhummakuptadit reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT markandhruv reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT zhangye reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT wuhonglu reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT scolesblaire reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT cohenjeffreyi reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT crucianbrian reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation AT piersonduanel reactivationoflatentepsteinbarrvirusacomparisonafterexposuretogammaprotoncarbonandironradiation |