Cargando…

Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions?

Low availability of inorganic phosphate (Pi), together with aluminum (Al), is a major constraint for plant growth and development in acidic soils. To investigate whether or not Al-resistant cultivars can perform better under Pi deficiency, we chose two wheat cultivars with different Al-responses—Atl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karim, Mohammad Rezaul, Dong, Xiaoying, Zheng, Lu, Shen, Renfang, Lan, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274178
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102964
_version_ 1783367705722617856
author Karim, Mohammad Rezaul
Dong, Xiaoying
Zheng, Lu
Shen, Renfang
Lan, Ping
author_facet Karim, Mohammad Rezaul
Dong, Xiaoying
Zheng, Lu
Shen, Renfang
Lan, Ping
author_sort Karim, Mohammad Rezaul
collection PubMed
description Low availability of inorganic phosphate (Pi), together with aluminum (Al), is a major constraint for plant growth and development in acidic soils. To investigate whether or not Al-resistant cultivars can perform better under Pi deficiency, we chose two wheat cultivars with different Al-responses—Atlas 66, being Al-tolerant, and Scout 66, which is Al-sensitive—and analyzed their responses to Pi deficiency. Results showed that, unexpectedly, the Al-sensitive cultivar Scout 66 contained comparatively higher amount of soluble phosphate (Pi) and total phosphorus (P) both in the roots and in the shoots than Atlas 66 under P deficiency. In addition, Scout 66 exhibited higher root biomass, root volume, and root tip numbers, compared with Atlas 66. The expression of Pi-responsive marker genes, TaIPS1, TaSPX3, and TaSQD2 was strongly induced in both cultivars, but the extents of induction were higher in Scout 66 than in Atlas 66 under long-term Pi starvation. Taken together, our results suggest that the Al-sensitive cultivar Scout 66 performed much better under sole Pi starvation, which sets the following experimental stage to uncover the underlying mechanisms of why Scout 66 can display better under Pi deficiency. Our study also raises an open question whether Al-resistant plants are more sensitive to Pi deficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6213158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62131582018-11-14 Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions? Karim, Mohammad Rezaul Dong, Xiaoying Zheng, Lu Shen, Renfang Lan, Ping Int J Mol Sci Article Low availability of inorganic phosphate (Pi), together with aluminum (Al), is a major constraint for plant growth and development in acidic soils. To investigate whether or not Al-resistant cultivars can perform better under Pi deficiency, we chose two wheat cultivars with different Al-responses—Atlas 66, being Al-tolerant, and Scout 66, which is Al-sensitive—and analyzed their responses to Pi deficiency. Results showed that, unexpectedly, the Al-sensitive cultivar Scout 66 contained comparatively higher amount of soluble phosphate (Pi) and total phosphorus (P) both in the roots and in the shoots than Atlas 66 under P deficiency. In addition, Scout 66 exhibited higher root biomass, root volume, and root tip numbers, compared with Atlas 66. The expression of Pi-responsive marker genes, TaIPS1, TaSPX3, and TaSQD2 was strongly induced in both cultivars, but the extents of induction were higher in Scout 66 than in Atlas 66 under long-term Pi starvation. Taken together, our results suggest that the Al-sensitive cultivar Scout 66 performed much better under sole Pi starvation, which sets the following experimental stage to uncover the underlying mechanisms of why Scout 66 can display better under Pi deficiency. Our study also raises an open question whether Al-resistant plants are more sensitive to Pi deficiency. MDPI 2018-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6213158/ /pubmed/30274178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102964 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Karim, Mohammad Rezaul
Dong, Xiaoying
Zheng, Lu
Shen, Renfang
Lan, Ping
Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions?
title Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions?
title_full Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions?
title_fullStr Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions?
title_full_unstemmed Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions?
title_short Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions?
title_sort can aluminum tolerant wheat cultivar perform better under phosphate deficient conditions?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274178
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102964
work_keys_str_mv AT karimmohammadrezaul canaluminumtolerantwheatcultivarperformbetterunderphosphatedeficientconditions
AT dongxiaoying canaluminumtolerantwheatcultivarperformbetterunderphosphatedeficientconditions
AT zhenglu canaluminumtolerantwheatcultivarperformbetterunderphosphatedeficientconditions
AT shenrenfang canaluminumtolerantwheatcultivarperformbetterunderphosphatedeficientconditions
AT lanping canaluminumtolerantwheatcultivarperformbetterunderphosphatedeficientconditions