Cargando…
Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions?
Low availability of inorganic phosphate (Pi), together with aluminum (Al), is a major constraint for plant growth and development in acidic soils. To investigate whether or not Al-resistant cultivars can perform better under Pi deficiency, we chose two wheat cultivars with different Al-responses—Atl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102964 |
_version_ | 1783367705722617856 |
---|---|
author | Karim, Mohammad Rezaul Dong, Xiaoying Zheng, Lu Shen, Renfang Lan, Ping |
author_facet | Karim, Mohammad Rezaul Dong, Xiaoying Zheng, Lu Shen, Renfang Lan, Ping |
author_sort | Karim, Mohammad Rezaul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Low availability of inorganic phosphate (Pi), together with aluminum (Al), is a major constraint for plant growth and development in acidic soils. To investigate whether or not Al-resistant cultivars can perform better under Pi deficiency, we chose two wheat cultivars with different Al-responses—Atlas 66, being Al-tolerant, and Scout 66, which is Al-sensitive—and analyzed their responses to Pi deficiency. Results showed that, unexpectedly, the Al-sensitive cultivar Scout 66 contained comparatively higher amount of soluble phosphate (Pi) and total phosphorus (P) both in the roots and in the shoots than Atlas 66 under P deficiency. In addition, Scout 66 exhibited higher root biomass, root volume, and root tip numbers, compared with Atlas 66. The expression of Pi-responsive marker genes, TaIPS1, TaSPX3, and TaSQD2 was strongly induced in both cultivars, but the extents of induction were higher in Scout 66 than in Atlas 66 under long-term Pi starvation. Taken together, our results suggest that the Al-sensitive cultivar Scout 66 performed much better under sole Pi starvation, which sets the following experimental stage to uncover the underlying mechanisms of why Scout 66 can display better under Pi deficiency. Our study also raises an open question whether Al-resistant plants are more sensitive to Pi deficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6213158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62131582018-11-14 Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions? Karim, Mohammad Rezaul Dong, Xiaoying Zheng, Lu Shen, Renfang Lan, Ping Int J Mol Sci Article Low availability of inorganic phosphate (Pi), together with aluminum (Al), is a major constraint for plant growth and development in acidic soils. To investigate whether or not Al-resistant cultivars can perform better under Pi deficiency, we chose two wheat cultivars with different Al-responses—Atlas 66, being Al-tolerant, and Scout 66, which is Al-sensitive—and analyzed their responses to Pi deficiency. Results showed that, unexpectedly, the Al-sensitive cultivar Scout 66 contained comparatively higher amount of soluble phosphate (Pi) and total phosphorus (P) both in the roots and in the shoots than Atlas 66 under P deficiency. In addition, Scout 66 exhibited higher root biomass, root volume, and root tip numbers, compared with Atlas 66. The expression of Pi-responsive marker genes, TaIPS1, TaSPX3, and TaSQD2 was strongly induced in both cultivars, but the extents of induction were higher in Scout 66 than in Atlas 66 under long-term Pi starvation. Taken together, our results suggest that the Al-sensitive cultivar Scout 66 performed much better under sole Pi starvation, which sets the following experimental stage to uncover the underlying mechanisms of why Scout 66 can display better under Pi deficiency. Our study also raises an open question whether Al-resistant plants are more sensitive to Pi deficiency. MDPI 2018-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6213158/ /pubmed/30274178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102964 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Karim, Mohammad Rezaul Dong, Xiaoying Zheng, Lu Shen, Renfang Lan, Ping Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions? |
title | Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions? |
title_full | Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions? |
title_fullStr | Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions? |
title_short | Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions? |
title_sort | can aluminum tolerant wheat cultivar perform better under phosphate deficient conditions? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102964 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karimmohammadrezaul canaluminumtolerantwheatcultivarperformbetterunderphosphatedeficientconditions AT dongxiaoying canaluminumtolerantwheatcultivarperformbetterunderphosphatedeficientconditions AT zhenglu canaluminumtolerantwheatcultivarperformbetterunderphosphatedeficientconditions AT shenrenfang canaluminumtolerantwheatcultivarperformbetterunderphosphatedeficientconditions AT lanping canaluminumtolerantwheatcultivarperformbetterunderphosphatedeficientconditions |