Cargando…

Physical and Histological Comparison of Hydroxyapatite, Carbonate Apatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes

Three commercially available artificial bone substitutes with different compositions, hydroxyapatite (HAp; Neobone(®)), carbonate apatite (CO(3)Ap; Cytrans(®)), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP; Cerasorb(®)), were compared with respect to their physical properties and tissue response to bone, using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishikawa, Kunio, Miyamoto, Youji, Tsuchiya, Akira, Hayashi, Koichiro, Tsuru, Kanji, Ohe, Go
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30332751
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11101993
_version_ 1783367706415726592
author Ishikawa, Kunio
Miyamoto, Youji
Tsuchiya, Akira
Hayashi, Koichiro
Tsuru, Kanji
Ohe, Go
author_facet Ishikawa, Kunio
Miyamoto, Youji
Tsuchiya, Akira
Hayashi, Koichiro
Tsuru, Kanji
Ohe, Go
author_sort Ishikawa, Kunio
collection PubMed
description Three commercially available artificial bone substitutes with different compositions, hydroxyapatite (HAp; Neobone(®)), carbonate apatite (CO(3)Ap; Cytrans(®)), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP; Cerasorb(®)), were compared with respect to their physical properties and tissue response to bone, using hybrid dogs. Both Neobone(®) (HAp) and Cerasorb(®) (β-TCP) were porous, whereas Cytrans(®) (CO(3)Ap) was dense. Crystallite size and specific surface area (SSA) of Neobone(®) (HAp), Cytrans(®) (CO(3)Ap), and Cerasorb(®) (β-TCP) were 75.4 ± 0.9 nm, 30.8 ± 0.8 nm, and 78.5 ± 7.5 nm, and 0.06 m(2)/g, 18.2 m(2)/g, and 1.0 m(2)/g, respectively. These values are consistent with the fact that both Neobone(®) (HAp) and Cerasorb(®) (β-TCP) are sintered ceramics, whereas Cytrans(®) (CO(3)Ap) is fabricated in aqueous solution. Dissolution in pH 5.3 solution mimicking Howship’s lacunae was fastest in CO(3)Ap (Cytrans(®)), whereas dissolution in pH 7.3 physiological solution was fastest in β-TCP (Cerasorb(®)). These results indicated that CO(3)Ap is stable under physiological conditions and is resorbed at Howship’s lacunae. Histological evaluation using hybrid dog mandible bone defect model revealed that new bone was formed from existing bone to the center of the bone defect when reconstructed with CO(3)Ap (Cytrans(®)) at week 4. The amount of bone increased at week 12, and resorption of the CO(3)Ap (Cytrans(®)) was confirmed. β-TCP (Cerasorb(®)) showed limited bone formation at week 4. However, a larger amount of bone was observed at week 12. Among these three bone substitutes, CO(3)Ap (Cytrans(®)) demonstrated the highest level of new bone formation. These results indicate the possibility that bone substitutes with compositions similar to that of bone may have properties similar to those of bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6213161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62131612018-11-14 Physical and Histological Comparison of Hydroxyapatite, Carbonate Apatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes Ishikawa, Kunio Miyamoto, Youji Tsuchiya, Akira Hayashi, Koichiro Tsuru, Kanji Ohe, Go Materials (Basel) Article Three commercially available artificial bone substitutes with different compositions, hydroxyapatite (HAp; Neobone(®)), carbonate apatite (CO(3)Ap; Cytrans(®)), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP; Cerasorb(®)), were compared with respect to their physical properties and tissue response to bone, using hybrid dogs. Both Neobone(®) (HAp) and Cerasorb(®) (β-TCP) were porous, whereas Cytrans(®) (CO(3)Ap) was dense. Crystallite size and specific surface area (SSA) of Neobone(®) (HAp), Cytrans(®) (CO(3)Ap), and Cerasorb(®) (β-TCP) were 75.4 ± 0.9 nm, 30.8 ± 0.8 nm, and 78.5 ± 7.5 nm, and 0.06 m(2)/g, 18.2 m(2)/g, and 1.0 m(2)/g, respectively. These values are consistent with the fact that both Neobone(®) (HAp) and Cerasorb(®) (β-TCP) are sintered ceramics, whereas Cytrans(®) (CO(3)Ap) is fabricated in aqueous solution. Dissolution in pH 5.3 solution mimicking Howship’s lacunae was fastest in CO(3)Ap (Cytrans(®)), whereas dissolution in pH 7.3 physiological solution was fastest in β-TCP (Cerasorb(®)). These results indicated that CO(3)Ap is stable under physiological conditions and is resorbed at Howship’s lacunae. Histological evaluation using hybrid dog mandible bone defect model revealed that new bone was formed from existing bone to the center of the bone defect when reconstructed with CO(3)Ap (Cytrans(®)) at week 4. The amount of bone increased at week 12, and resorption of the CO(3)Ap (Cytrans(®)) was confirmed. β-TCP (Cerasorb(®)) showed limited bone formation at week 4. However, a larger amount of bone was observed at week 12. Among these three bone substitutes, CO(3)Ap (Cytrans(®)) demonstrated the highest level of new bone formation. These results indicate the possibility that bone substitutes with compositions similar to that of bone may have properties similar to those of bone. MDPI 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6213161/ /pubmed/30332751 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11101993 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ishikawa, Kunio
Miyamoto, Youji
Tsuchiya, Akira
Hayashi, Koichiro
Tsuru, Kanji
Ohe, Go
Physical and Histological Comparison of Hydroxyapatite, Carbonate Apatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes
title Physical and Histological Comparison of Hydroxyapatite, Carbonate Apatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes
title_full Physical and Histological Comparison of Hydroxyapatite, Carbonate Apatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes
title_fullStr Physical and Histological Comparison of Hydroxyapatite, Carbonate Apatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes
title_full_unstemmed Physical and Histological Comparison of Hydroxyapatite, Carbonate Apatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes
title_short Physical and Histological Comparison of Hydroxyapatite, Carbonate Apatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes
title_sort physical and histological comparison of hydroxyapatite, carbonate apatite, and β-tricalcium phosphate bone substitutes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30332751
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11101993
work_keys_str_mv AT ishikawakunio physicalandhistologicalcomparisonofhydroxyapatitecarbonateapatiteandbtricalciumphosphatebonesubstitutes
AT miyamotoyouji physicalandhistologicalcomparisonofhydroxyapatitecarbonateapatiteandbtricalciumphosphatebonesubstitutes
AT tsuchiyaakira physicalandhistologicalcomparisonofhydroxyapatitecarbonateapatiteandbtricalciumphosphatebonesubstitutes
AT hayashikoichiro physicalandhistologicalcomparisonofhydroxyapatitecarbonateapatiteandbtricalciumphosphatebonesubstitutes
AT tsurukanji physicalandhistologicalcomparisonofhydroxyapatitecarbonateapatiteandbtricalciumphosphatebonesubstitutes
AT ohego physicalandhistologicalcomparisonofhydroxyapatitecarbonateapatiteandbtricalciumphosphatebonesubstitutes