Cargando…

Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities

Obesity prevalence is higher in children with developmental disabilities as compared to their typically developing peers. Research on dietary intake assessment methods in this vulnerable population is lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and compare th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polfuss, Michele, Moosreiner, Andrea, Boushey, Carol J., Delp, Edward J., Zhu, Fengqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10101482
_version_ 1783367720219181056
author Polfuss, Michele
Moosreiner, Andrea
Boushey, Carol J.
Delp, Edward J.
Zhu, Fengqing
author_facet Polfuss, Michele
Moosreiner, Andrea
Boushey, Carol J.
Delp, Edward J.
Zhu, Fengqing
author_sort Polfuss, Michele
collection PubMed
description Obesity prevalence is higher in children with developmental disabilities as compared to their typically developing peers. Research on dietary intake assessment methods in this vulnerable population is lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and compare the nutrient intakes of two technology-based dietary assessment methods in children with-and-without developmental disabilities. This cross-sectional feasibility study was an added aim to a larger pilot study. Children (n = 12; 8–18 years) diagnosed with spina bifida, Down syndrome, or without disability were recruited from the larger study sample, stratified by diagnosis. Participants were asked to complete six days of a mobile food record (mFR™), a 24-h dietary recall via FaceTime(®) (24 HR-FT), and a post-study survey. Analysis included descriptive statistics for survey results and a paired samples t-test for nutrient intakes. All participants successfully completed six days of dietary assessment using both methods and acceptability was high. Energy (kcal) and protein (g) intake was significantly higher for the mFR™ as compared to the 24 HR-FT (p = 0.041; p = 0.014, respectively). Each method had strengths and weaknesses. The two technology-based dietary assessment tools were well accepted and when combined could increase accuracy of self-reported dietary assessment in children with-and-without disability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6213225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62132252018-11-06 Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities Polfuss, Michele Moosreiner, Andrea Boushey, Carol J. Delp, Edward J. Zhu, Fengqing Nutrients Article Obesity prevalence is higher in children with developmental disabilities as compared to their typically developing peers. Research on dietary intake assessment methods in this vulnerable population is lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and compare the nutrient intakes of two technology-based dietary assessment methods in children with-and-without developmental disabilities. This cross-sectional feasibility study was an added aim to a larger pilot study. Children (n = 12; 8–18 years) diagnosed with spina bifida, Down syndrome, or without disability were recruited from the larger study sample, stratified by diagnosis. Participants were asked to complete six days of a mobile food record (mFR™), a 24-h dietary recall via FaceTime(®) (24 HR-FT), and a post-study survey. Analysis included descriptive statistics for survey results and a paired samples t-test for nutrient intakes. All participants successfully completed six days of dietary assessment using both methods and acceptability was high. Energy (kcal) and protein (g) intake was significantly higher for the mFR™ as compared to the 24 HR-FT (p = 0.041; p = 0.014, respectively). Each method had strengths and weaknesses. The two technology-based dietary assessment tools were well accepted and when combined could increase accuracy of self-reported dietary assessment in children with-and-without disability. MDPI 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6213225/ /pubmed/30314313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10101482 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Polfuss, Michele
Moosreiner, Andrea
Boushey, Carol J.
Delp, Edward J.
Zhu, Fengqing
Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities
title Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities
title_full Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities
title_fullStr Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities
title_full_unstemmed Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities
title_short Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities
title_sort technology-based dietary assessment in youth with and without developmental disabilities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10101482
work_keys_str_mv AT polfussmichele technologybaseddietaryassessmentinyouthwithandwithoutdevelopmentaldisabilities
AT moosreinerandrea technologybaseddietaryassessmentinyouthwithandwithoutdevelopmentaldisabilities
AT bousheycarolj technologybaseddietaryassessmentinyouthwithandwithoutdevelopmentaldisabilities
AT delpedwardj technologybaseddietaryassessmentinyouthwithandwithoutdevelopmentaldisabilities
AT zhufengqing technologybaseddietaryassessmentinyouthwithandwithoutdevelopmentaldisabilities