Cargando…
Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities
Obesity prevalence is higher in children with developmental disabilities as compared to their typically developing peers. Research on dietary intake assessment methods in this vulnerable population is lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and compare th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10101482 |
_version_ | 1783367720219181056 |
---|---|
author | Polfuss, Michele Moosreiner, Andrea Boushey, Carol J. Delp, Edward J. Zhu, Fengqing |
author_facet | Polfuss, Michele Moosreiner, Andrea Boushey, Carol J. Delp, Edward J. Zhu, Fengqing |
author_sort | Polfuss, Michele |
collection | PubMed |
description | Obesity prevalence is higher in children with developmental disabilities as compared to their typically developing peers. Research on dietary intake assessment methods in this vulnerable population is lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and compare the nutrient intakes of two technology-based dietary assessment methods in children with-and-without developmental disabilities. This cross-sectional feasibility study was an added aim to a larger pilot study. Children (n = 12; 8–18 years) diagnosed with spina bifida, Down syndrome, or without disability were recruited from the larger study sample, stratified by diagnosis. Participants were asked to complete six days of a mobile food record (mFR™), a 24-h dietary recall via FaceTime(®) (24 HR-FT), and a post-study survey. Analysis included descriptive statistics for survey results and a paired samples t-test for nutrient intakes. All participants successfully completed six days of dietary assessment using both methods and acceptability was high. Energy (kcal) and protein (g) intake was significantly higher for the mFR™ as compared to the 24 HR-FT (p = 0.041; p = 0.014, respectively). Each method had strengths and weaknesses. The two technology-based dietary assessment tools were well accepted and when combined could increase accuracy of self-reported dietary assessment in children with-and-without disability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6213225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62132252018-11-06 Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities Polfuss, Michele Moosreiner, Andrea Boushey, Carol J. Delp, Edward J. Zhu, Fengqing Nutrients Article Obesity prevalence is higher in children with developmental disabilities as compared to their typically developing peers. Research on dietary intake assessment methods in this vulnerable population is lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and compare the nutrient intakes of two technology-based dietary assessment methods in children with-and-without developmental disabilities. This cross-sectional feasibility study was an added aim to a larger pilot study. Children (n = 12; 8–18 years) diagnosed with spina bifida, Down syndrome, or without disability were recruited from the larger study sample, stratified by diagnosis. Participants were asked to complete six days of a mobile food record (mFR™), a 24-h dietary recall via FaceTime(®) (24 HR-FT), and a post-study survey. Analysis included descriptive statistics for survey results and a paired samples t-test for nutrient intakes. All participants successfully completed six days of dietary assessment using both methods and acceptability was high. Energy (kcal) and protein (g) intake was significantly higher for the mFR™ as compared to the 24 HR-FT (p = 0.041; p = 0.014, respectively). Each method had strengths and weaknesses. The two technology-based dietary assessment tools were well accepted and when combined could increase accuracy of self-reported dietary assessment in children with-and-without disability. MDPI 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6213225/ /pubmed/30314313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10101482 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Polfuss, Michele Moosreiner, Andrea Boushey, Carol J. Delp, Edward J. Zhu, Fengqing Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities |
title | Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities |
title_full | Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities |
title_fullStr | Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities |
title_full_unstemmed | Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities |
title_short | Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities |
title_sort | technology-based dietary assessment in youth with and without developmental disabilities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10101482 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polfussmichele technologybaseddietaryassessmentinyouthwithandwithoutdevelopmentaldisabilities AT moosreinerandrea technologybaseddietaryassessmentinyouthwithandwithoutdevelopmentaldisabilities AT bousheycarolj technologybaseddietaryassessmentinyouthwithandwithoutdevelopmentaldisabilities AT delpedwardj technologybaseddietaryassessmentinyouthwithandwithoutdevelopmentaldisabilities AT zhufengqing technologybaseddietaryassessmentinyouthwithandwithoutdevelopmentaldisabilities |