Cargando…

Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold?

The vaccination of pregnant women has enormous potential to protect not only mothers from vaccine-preventable diseases but also their infants through the passive acquisition of protective antibodies before they are able to themselves acquire protection through active childhood immunisations. Materna...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giles, Michelle L., Krishnaswamy, Sushena, Wallace, Euan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30443339
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15475.1
_version_ 1783367852889210880
author Giles, Michelle L.
Krishnaswamy, Sushena
Wallace, Euan M.
author_facet Giles, Michelle L.
Krishnaswamy, Sushena
Wallace, Euan M.
author_sort Giles, Michelle L.
collection PubMed
description The vaccination of pregnant women has enormous potential to protect not only mothers from vaccine-preventable diseases but also their infants through the passive acquisition of protective antibodies before they are able to themselves acquire protection through active childhood immunisations. Maternal tetanus programmes have been in place since 1989, and as of March 2018, only 14 countries in the world were still to reach maternal neonatal tetanus elimination status. This has saved hundreds of thousands of lives. Building on this success, influenza- and pertussis-containing vaccines have been recommended for pregnant women and introduced into immunisation programmes, albeit predominantly in resource-rich settings. These have highlighted some important challenges when additional immunisations are introduced into the antenatal context. With new vaccine candidates, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and group B streptococcus (GBS), on the horizon, it is important that we learn from these experiences, identify the information gaps, and close these to ensure safe and successful implementation of maternal vaccines in the future, particularly in low- and middle-income countries with a high burden of disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6213781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62137812018-11-14 Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold? Giles, Michelle L. Krishnaswamy, Sushena Wallace, Euan M. F1000Res Review The vaccination of pregnant women has enormous potential to protect not only mothers from vaccine-preventable diseases but also their infants through the passive acquisition of protective antibodies before they are able to themselves acquire protection through active childhood immunisations. Maternal tetanus programmes have been in place since 1989, and as of March 2018, only 14 countries in the world were still to reach maternal neonatal tetanus elimination status. This has saved hundreds of thousands of lives. Building on this success, influenza- and pertussis-containing vaccines have been recommended for pregnant women and introduced into immunisation programmes, albeit predominantly in resource-rich settings. These have highlighted some important challenges when additional immunisations are introduced into the antenatal context. With new vaccine candidates, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and group B streptococcus (GBS), on the horizon, it is important that we learn from these experiences, identify the information gaps, and close these to ensure safe and successful implementation of maternal vaccines in the future, particularly in low- and middle-income countries with a high burden of disease. F1000 Research Limited 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6213781/ /pubmed/30443339 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15475.1 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Giles ML et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Giles, Michelle L.
Krishnaswamy, Sushena
Wallace, Euan M.
Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold?
title Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold?
title_full Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold?
title_fullStr Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold?
title_full_unstemmed Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold?
title_short Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold?
title_sort maternal immunisation: what have been the gains? where are the gaps? what does the future hold?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30443339
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15475.1
work_keys_str_mv AT gilesmichellel maternalimmunisationwhathavebeenthegainswherearethegapswhatdoesthefuturehold
AT krishnaswamysushena maternalimmunisationwhathavebeenthegainswherearethegapswhatdoesthefuturehold
AT wallaceeuanm maternalimmunisationwhathavebeenthegainswherearethegapswhatdoesthefuturehold