Cargando…
Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold?
The vaccination of pregnant women has enormous potential to protect not only mothers from vaccine-preventable diseases but also their infants through the passive acquisition of protective antibodies before they are able to themselves acquire protection through active childhood immunisations. Materna...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30443339 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15475.1 |
_version_ | 1783367852889210880 |
---|---|
author | Giles, Michelle L. Krishnaswamy, Sushena Wallace, Euan M. |
author_facet | Giles, Michelle L. Krishnaswamy, Sushena Wallace, Euan M. |
author_sort | Giles, Michelle L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The vaccination of pregnant women has enormous potential to protect not only mothers from vaccine-preventable diseases but also their infants through the passive acquisition of protective antibodies before they are able to themselves acquire protection through active childhood immunisations. Maternal tetanus programmes have been in place since 1989, and as of March 2018, only 14 countries in the world were still to reach maternal neonatal tetanus elimination status. This has saved hundreds of thousands of lives. Building on this success, influenza- and pertussis-containing vaccines have been recommended for pregnant women and introduced into immunisation programmes, albeit predominantly in resource-rich settings. These have highlighted some important challenges when additional immunisations are introduced into the antenatal context. With new vaccine candidates, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and group B streptococcus (GBS), on the horizon, it is important that we learn from these experiences, identify the information gaps, and close these to ensure safe and successful implementation of maternal vaccines in the future, particularly in low- and middle-income countries with a high burden of disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6213781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62137812018-11-14 Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold? Giles, Michelle L. Krishnaswamy, Sushena Wallace, Euan M. F1000Res Review The vaccination of pregnant women has enormous potential to protect not only mothers from vaccine-preventable diseases but also their infants through the passive acquisition of protective antibodies before they are able to themselves acquire protection through active childhood immunisations. Maternal tetanus programmes have been in place since 1989, and as of March 2018, only 14 countries in the world were still to reach maternal neonatal tetanus elimination status. This has saved hundreds of thousands of lives. Building on this success, influenza- and pertussis-containing vaccines have been recommended for pregnant women and introduced into immunisation programmes, albeit predominantly in resource-rich settings. These have highlighted some important challenges when additional immunisations are introduced into the antenatal context. With new vaccine candidates, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and group B streptococcus (GBS), on the horizon, it is important that we learn from these experiences, identify the information gaps, and close these to ensure safe and successful implementation of maternal vaccines in the future, particularly in low- and middle-income countries with a high burden of disease. F1000 Research Limited 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6213781/ /pubmed/30443339 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15475.1 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Giles ML et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Giles, Michelle L. Krishnaswamy, Sushena Wallace, Euan M. Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold? |
title | Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold? |
title_full | Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold? |
title_fullStr | Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold? |
title_full_unstemmed | Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold? |
title_short | Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold? |
title_sort | maternal immunisation: what have been the gains? where are the gaps? what does the future hold? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30443339 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15475.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilesmichellel maternalimmunisationwhathavebeenthegainswherearethegapswhatdoesthefuturehold AT krishnaswamysushena maternalimmunisationwhathavebeenthegainswherearethegapswhatdoesthefuturehold AT wallaceeuanm maternalimmunisationwhathavebeenthegainswherearethegapswhatdoesthefuturehold |