Cargando…

In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration

The use of non-resorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes is indicated for the treatment of large, non-self-containing bone defects, or multi-walled defects in the case of vertical augmentations. However, less is known about the molecular basis of the foreign body response to PTFE membranes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korzinskas, Tadas, Jung, Ole, Smeets, Ralf, Stojanovic, Sanja, Najman, Stevo, Glenske, Kristina, Hahn, Michael, Wenisch, Sabine, Schnettler, Reinhard, Barbeck, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30262765
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102952
_version_ 1783367871798181888
author Korzinskas, Tadas
Jung, Ole
Smeets, Ralf
Stojanovic, Sanja
Najman, Stevo
Glenske, Kristina
Hahn, Michael
Wenisch, Sabine
Schnettler, Reinhard
Barbeck, Mike
author_facet Korzinskas, Tadas
Jung, Ole
Smeets, Ralf
Stojanovic, Sanja
Najman, Stevo
Glenske, Kristina
Hahn, Michael
Wenisch, Sabine
Schnettler, Reinhard
Barbeck, Mike
author_sort Korzinskas, Tadas
collection PubMed
description The use of non-resorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes is indicated for the treatment of large, non-self-containing bone defects, or multi-walled defects in the case of vertical augmentations. However, less is known about the molecular basis of the foreign body response to PTFE membranes. In the present study, the inflammatory tissue responses to a novel high-density PTFE (dPTFE) barrier membrane have preclinically been evaluated using the subcutaneous implantation model in BALB/c mice by means of histopathological and histomorphometrical analysis methods and immunohistochemical detection of M1- and M2-macrophages. A collagen membrane was used as the control material. The results of the present study demonstrate that the tissue response to the dPTFE membrane involves inflammatory macrophages, but comparable cell numbers were also detected in the implant beds of the control collagen membrane, which is known to be biocompatible. Although these data indicate that the analyzed dPTFE membrane is not fully bioinert, but its biocompatibility is comparable to collagen-based membranes. Based on its optimal biocompatibility, the novel dPTFE barrier membrane may optimally support bone healing within the context of guided bone regeneration (GBR).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6213856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62138562018-11-14 In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration Korzinskas, Tadas Jung, Ole Smeets, Ralf Stojanovic, Sanja Najman, Stevo Glenske, Kristina Hahn, Michael Wenisch, Sabine Schnettler, Reinhard Barbeck, Mike Int J Mol Sci Article The use of non-resorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes is indicated for the treatment of large, non-self-containing bone defects, or multi-walled defects in the case of vertical augmentations. However, less is known about the molecular basis of the foreign body response to PTFE membranes. In the present study, the inflammatory tissue responses to a novel high-density PTFE (dPTFE) barrier membrane have preclinically been evaluated using the subcutaneous implantation model in BALB/c mice by means of histopathological and histomorphometrical analysis methods and immunohistochemical detection of M1- and M2-macrophages. A collagen membrane was used as the control material. The results of the present study demonstrate that the tissue response to the dPTFE membrane involves inflammatory macrophages, but comparable cell numbers were also detected in the implant beds of the control collagen membrane, which is known to be biocompatible. Although these data indicate that the analyzed dPTFE membrane is not fully bioinert, but its biocompatibility is comparable to collagen-based membranes. Based on its optimal biocompatibility, the novel dPTFE barrier membrane may optimally support bone healing within the context of guided bone regeneration (GBR). MDPI 2018-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6213856/ /pubmed/30262765 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102952 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Korzinskas, Tadas
Jung, Ole
Smeets, Ralf
Stojanovic, Sanja
Najman, Stevo
Glenske, Kristina
Hahn, Michael
Wenisch, Sabine
Schnettler, Reinhard
Barbeck, Mike
In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_full In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_fullStr In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_full_unstemmed In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_short In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_sort in vivo analysis of the biocompatibility and macrophage response of a non-resorbable ptfe membrane for guided bone regeneration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30262765
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102952
work_keys_str_mv AT korzinskastadas invivoanalysisofthebiocompatibilityandmacrophageresponseofanonresorbableptfemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT jungole invivoanalysisofthebiocompatibilityandmacrophageresponseofanonresorbableptfemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT smeetsralf invivoanalysisofthebiocompatibilityandmacrophageresponseofanonresorbableptfemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT stojanovicsanja invivoanalysisofthebiocompatibilityandmacrophageresponseofanonresorbableptfemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT najmanstevo invivoanalysisofthebiocompatibilityandmacrophageresponseofanonresorbableptfemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT glenskekristina invivoanalysisofthebiocompatibilityandmacrophageresponseofanonresorbableptfemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT hahnmichael invivoanalysisofthebiocompatibilityandmacrophageresponseofanonresorbableptfemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT wenischsabine invivoanalysisofthebiocompatibilityandmacrophageresponseofanonresorbableptfemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT schnettlerreinhard invivoanalysisofthebiocompatibilityandmacrophageresponseofanonresorbableptfemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT barbeckmike invivoanalysisofthebiocompatibilityandmacrophageresponseofanonresorbableptfemembraneforguidedboneregeneration