Cargando…
How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis
Different steps and conditions for DNA extraction for microbiota analysis in sputum have been reported in the literature. We aimed at testing both dithiothreitol (DTT) and enzymatic treatments of sputum samples and identifying the most suitable DNA extraction technique for the microbiota analysis of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30347804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103256 |
_version_ | 1783367925267169280 |
---|---|
author | Terranova, Leonardo Oriano, Martina Teri, Antonio Ruggiero, Luca Tafuro, Camilla Marchisio, Paola Gramegna, Andrea Contarini, Martina Franceschi, Elisa Sottotetti, Samantha Cariani, Lisa Bevivino, Annamaria Chalmers, James D. Aliberti, Stefano Blasi, Francesco |
author_facet | Terranova, Leonardo Oriano, Martina Teri, Antonio Ruggiero, Luca Tafuro, Camilla Marchisio, Paola Gramegna, Andrea Contarini, Martina Franceschi, Elisa Sottotetti, Samantha Cariani, Lisa Bevivino, Annamaria Chalmers, James D. Aliberti, Stefano Blasi, Francesco |
author_sort | Terranova, Leonardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Different steps and conditions for DNA extraction for microbiota analysis in sputum have been reported in the literature. We aimed at testing both dithiothreitol (DTT) and enzymatic treatments of sputum samples and identifying the most suitable DNA extraction technique for the microbiota analysis of sputum. Sputum treatments with and without DTT were compared in terms of their median levels and the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene. Treatments with and without lysozyme and lysostaphin were compared in terms of their median levels of real-time PCR for S. aureus. Two enzyme-based and three beads-based techniques for DNA extraction were compared in terms of their DNA extraction yield, real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene and microbiota analysis. DTT treatment decreased the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR. Lysostaphin (either 0.18 or 0.36 mg/mL) and lysozyme treatments increased S. aureus detection. One enzyme-based kit offered the highest DNA yield and 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR with no significant differences in terms of alpha-diversity indexes. A condition using both DTT and lysostaphin/lysozyme treatments along with an enzymatic kit seems to be preferred for the microbiota analysis of sputum samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6214103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62141032018-11-14 How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis Terranova, Leonardo Oriano, Martina Teri, Antonio Ruggiero, Luca Tafuro, Camilla Marchisio, Paola Gramegna, Andrea Contarini, Martina Franceschi, Elisa Sottotetti, Samantha Cariani, Lisa Bevivino, Annamaria Chalmers, James D. Aliberti, Stefano Blasi, Francesco Int J Mol Sci Article Different steps and conditions for DNA extraction for microbiota analysis in sputum have been reported in the literature. We aimed at testing both dithiothreitol (DTT) and enzymatic treatments of sputum samples and identifying the most suitable DNA extraction technique for the microbiota analysis of sputum. Sputum treatments with and without DTT were compared in terms of their median levels and the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene. Treatments with and without lysozyme and lysostaphin were compared in terms of their median levels of real-time PCR for S. aureus. Two enzyme-based and three beads-based techniques for DNA extraction were compared in terms of their DNA extraction yield, real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene and microbiota analysis. DTT treatment decreased the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR. Lysostaphin (either 0.18 or 0.36 mg/mL) and lysozyme treatments increased S. aureus detection. One enzyme-based kit offered the highest DNA yield and 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR with no significant differences in terms of alpha-diversity indexes. A condition using both DTT and lysostaphin/lysozyme treatments along with an enzymatic kit seems to be preferred for the microbiota analysis of sputum samples. MDPI 2018-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6214103/ /pubmed/30347804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103256 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Terranova, Leonardo Oriano, Martina Teri, Antonio Ruggiero, Luca Tafuro, Camilla Marchisio, Paola Gramegna, Andrea Contarini, Martina Franceschi, Elisa Sottotetti, Samantha Cariani, Lisa Bevivino, Annamaria Chalmers, James D. Aliberti, Stefano Blasi, Francesco How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis |
title | How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis |
title_full | How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis |
title_fullStr | How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis |
title_short | How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis |
title_sort | how to process sputum samples and extract bacterial dna for microbiota analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30347804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103256 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terranovaleonardo howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT orianomartina howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT teriantonio howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT ruggieroluca howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT tafurocamilla howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT marchisiopaola howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT gramegnaandrea howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT contarinimartina howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT franceschielisa howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT sottotettisamantha howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT carianilisa howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT bevivinoannamaria howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT chalmersjamesd howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT alibertistefano howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis AT blasifrancesco howtoprocesssputumsamplesandextractbacterialdnaformicrobiotaanalysis |