Cargando…

Distinct Signatures of Host Defense Suppression by Plant-Feeding Mites

Tomato plants are attacked by diverse herbivorous arthropods, including by cell-content-feeding mites, such as the extreme generalist Tetranychus urticae and specialists like Tetranychus evansi and Aculops lycopersici. Mite feeding induces plant defense responses that reduce mite performance. Howeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schimmel, Bernardus C. J., Alba, Juan M., Wybouw, Nicky, Glas, Joris J., Meijer, Tomas T., Schuurink, Robert C., Kant, Merijn R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30347842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103265
_version_ 1783367933025583104
author Schimmel, Bernardus C. J.
Alba, Juan M.
Wybouw, Nicky
Glas, Joris J.
Meijer, Tomas T.
Schuurink, Robert C.
Kant, Merijn R.
author_facet Schimmel, Bernardus C. J.
Alba, Juan M.
Wybouw, Nicky
Glas, Joris J.
Meijer, Tomas T.
Schuurink, Robert C.
Kant, Merijn R.
author_sort Schimmel, Bernardus C. J.
collection PubMed
description Tomato plants are attacked by diverse herbivorous arthropods, including by cell-content-feeding mites, such as the extreme generalist Tetranychus urticae and specialists like Tetranychus evansi and Aculops lycopersici. Mite feeding induces plant defense responses that reduce mite performance. However, T. evansi and A. lycopersici suppress plant defenses via poorly understood mechanisms and, consequently, maintain a high performance on tomato. On a shared host, T. urticae can be facilitated by either of the specialist mites, likely due to the suppression of plant defenses. To better understand defense suppression and indirect plant-mediated interactions between herbivorous mites, we used gene-expression microarrays to analyze the transcriptomic changes in tomato after attack by either a single mite species (T. urticae, T. evansi, A. lycopersici) or two species simultaneously (T. urticae plus T. evansi or T. urticae plus A. lycopersici). Additionally, we assessed mite-induced changes in defense-associated phytohormones using LC-MS/MS. Compared to non-infested controls, jasmonates (JAs) and salicylate (SA) accumulated to higher amounts upon all mite-infestation treatments, but the response was attenuated after single infestations with defense-suppressors. Strikingly, whereas 8 to 10% of tomato genes were differentially expressed upon single infestations with T. urticae or A. lycopersici, respectively, only 0.1% was altered in T. evansi-infested plants. Transcriptome analysis of dual-infested leaves revealed that A. lycopersici primarily suppressed T. urticae-induced JA defenses, while T. evansi dampened T. urticae-triggered host responses on a transcriptome-wide scale. The latter suggests that T. evansi not solely down-regulates plant gene expression, but rather directs it back towards housekeeping levels. Our results provide valuable new insights into the mechanisms underlying host defense suppression and the plant-mediated facilitation of competing herbivores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6214137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62141372018-11-14 Distinct Signatures of Host Defense Suppression by Plant-Feeding Mites Schimmel, Bernardus C. J. Alba, Juan M. Wybouw, Nicky Glas, Joris J. Meijer, Tomas T. Schuurink, Robert C. Kant, Merijn R. Int J Mol Sci Article Tomato plants are attacked by diverse herbivorous arthropods, including by cell-content-feeding mites, such as the extreme generalist Tetranychus urticae and specialists like Tetranychus evansi and Aculops lycopersici. Mite feeding induces plant defense responses that reduce mite performance. However, T. evansi and A. lycopersici suppress plant defenses via poorly understood mechanisms and, consequently, maintain a high performance on tomato. On a shared host, T. urticae can be facilitated by either of the specialist mites, likely due to the suppression of plant defenses. To better understand defense suppression and indirect plant-mediated interactions between herbivorous mites, we used gene-expression microarrays to analyze the transcriptomic changes in tomato after attack by either a single mite species (T. urticae, T. evansi, A. lycopersici) or two species simultaneously (T. urticae plus T. evansi or T. urticae plus A. lycopersici). Additionally, we assessed mite-induced changes in defense-associated phytohormones using LC-MS/MS. Compared to non-infested controls, jasmonates (JAs) and salicylate (SA) accumulated to higher amounts upon all mite-infestation treatments, but the response was attenuated after single infestations with defense-suppressors. Strikingly, whereas 8 to 10% of tomato genes were differentially expressed upon single infestations with T. urticae or A. lycopersici, respectively, only 0.1% was altered in T. evansi-infested plants. Transcriptome analysis of dual-infested leaves revealed that A. lycopersici primarily suppressed T. urticae-induced JA defenses, while T. evansi dampened T. urticae-triggered host responses on a transcriptome-wide scale. The latter suggests that T. evansi not solely down-regulates plant gene expression, but rather directs it back towards housekeeping levels. Our results provide valuable new insights into the mechanisms underlying host defense suppression and the plant-mediated facilitation of competing herbivores. MDPI 2018-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6214137/ /pubmed/30347842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103265 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schimmel, Bernardus C. J.
Alba, Juan M.
Wybouw, Nicky
Glas, Joris J.
Meijer, Tomas T.
Schuurink, Robert C.
Kant, Merijn R.
Distinct Signatures of Host Defense Suppression by Plant-Feeding Mites
title Distinct Signatures of Host Defense Suppression by Plant-Feeding Mites
title_full Distinct Signatures of Host Defense Suppression by Plant-Feeding Mites
title_fullStr Distinct Signatures of Host Defense Suppression by Plant-Feeding Mites
title_full_unstemmed Distinct Signatures of Host Defense Suppression by Plant-Feeding Mites
title_short Distinct Signatures of Host Defense Suppression by Plant-Feeding Mites
title_sort distinct signatures of host defense suppression by plant-feeding mites
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30347842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103265
work_keys_str_mv AT schimmelbernarduscj distinctsignaturesofhostdefensesuppressionbyplantfeedingmites
AT albajuanm distinctsignaturesofhostdefensesuppressionbyplantfeedingmites
AT wybouwnicky distinctsignaturesofhostdefensesuppressionbyplantfeedingmites
AT glasjorisj distinctsignaturesofhostdefensesuppressionbyplantfeedingmites
AT meijertomast distinctsignaturesofhostdefensesuppressionbyplantfeedingmites
AT schuurinkrobertc distinctsignaturesofhostdefensesuppressionbyplantfeedingmites
AT kantmerijnr distinctsignaturesofhostdefensesuppressionbyplantfeedingmites