Cargando…
Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance
The international exchange of goods and services is increasingly organised along global value chains in which the various production stages are carried out at many different locations all over the world. A country can be seen as holding a central position in global trade to the extent that it is inv...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30443576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41109-017-0041-4 |
_version_ | 1783367954417582080 |
---|---|
author | Cingolani, Isabella Panzarasa, Pietro Tajoli, Lucia |
author_facet | Cingolani, Isabella Panzarasa, Pietro Tajoli, Lucia |
author_sort | Cingolani, Isabella |
collection | PubMed |
description | The international exchange of goods and services is increasingly organised along global value chains in which the various production stages are carried out at many different locations all over the world. A country can be seen as holding a central position in global trade to the extent that it is involved in a large number of economic transactions with alternative potential suppliers and has a wide access to different important markets. However, the centrality of countries’ positions in the international production of goods and services may vary according to the specific stages of the production process that countries occupy. Here we adopt a network-based perspective, and propose a novel three-faceted measure of centrality that captures countries’ distinct roles at the upstream, midstream, and downstream stages of the international production process. Findings suggest that rankings of countries based on our measures of centrality vary across production stages. While emerging and developing countries tend to secure central positions at upstream and midstream production stages, high-income countries tend to exert prevailing roles at downstream stages. Moreover, rankings based on our measures differ from alternative rankings obtained from traditional measures of market power simply reflecting aggregate trade values. This is especially the case within more traditional industries, such as Textiles and Apparel, in which small and less developed countries can play relevant roles at various stages of the production process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41109-017-0041-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6214273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62142732018-11-13 Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance Cingolani, Isabella Panzarasa, Pietro Tajoli, Lucia Appl Netw Sci Research The international exchange of goods and services is increasingly organised along global value chains in which the various production stages are carried out at many different locations all over the world. A country can be seen as holding a central position in global trade to the extent that it is involved in a large number of economic transactions with alternative potential suppliers and has a wide access to different important markets. However, the centrality of countries’ positions in the international production of goods and services may vary according to the specific stages of the production process that countries occupy. Here we adopt a network-based perspective, and propose a novel three-faceted measure of centrality that captures countries’ distinct roles at the upstream, midstream, and downstream stages of the international production process. Findings suggest that rankings of countries based on our measures of centrality vary across production stages. While emerging and developing countries tend to secure central positions at upstream and midstream production stages, high-income countries tend to exert prevailing roles at downstream stages. Moreover, rankings based on our measures differ from alternative rankings obtained from traditional measures of market power simply reflecting aggregate trade values. This is especially the case within more traditional industries, such as Textiles and Apparel, in which small and less developed countries can play relevant roles at various stages of the production process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41109-017-0041-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-07-12 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6214273/ /pubmed/30443576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41109-017-0041-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Cingolani, Isabella Panzarasa, Pietro Tajoli, Lucia Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance |
title | Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance |
title_full | Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance |
title_fullStr | Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance |
title_short | Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance |
title_sort | countries’ positions in the international global value networks: centrality and economic performance |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30443576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41109-017-0041-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cingolaniisabella countriespositionsintheinternationalglobalvaluenetworkscentralityandeconomicperformance AT panzarasapietro countriespositionsintheinternationalglobalvaluenetworkscentralityandeconomicperformance AT tajolilucia countriespositionsintheinternationalglobalvaluenetworkscentralityandeconomicperformance |