Cargando…

Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance

The international exchange of goods and services is increasingly organised along global value chains in which the various production stages are carried out at many different locations all over the world. A country can be seen as holding a central position in global trade to the extent that it is inv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cingolani, Isabella, Panzarasa, Pietro, Tajoli, Lucia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30443576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41109-017-0041-4
_version_ 1783367954417582080
author Cingolani, Isabella
Panzarasa, Pietro
Tajoli, Lucia
author_facet Cingolani, Isabella
Panzarasa, Pietro
Tajoli, Lucia
author_sort Cingolani, Isabella
collection PubMed
description The international exchange of goods and services is increasingly organised along global value chains in which the various production stages are carried out at many different locations all over the world. A country can be seen as holding a central position in global trade to the extent that it is involved in a large number of economic transactions with alternative potential suppliers and has a wide access to different important markets. However, the centrality of countries’ positions in the international production of goods and services may vary according to the specific stages of the production process that countries occupy. Here we adopt a network-based perspective, and propose a novel three-faceted measure of centrality that captures countries’ distinct roles at the upstream, midstream, and downstream stages of the international production process. Findings suggest that rankings of countries based on our measures of centrality vary across production stages. While emerging and developing countries tend to secure central positions at upstream and midstream production stages, high-income countries tend to exert prevailing roles at downstream stages. Moreover, rankings based on our measures differ from alternative rankings obtained from traditional measures of market power simply reflecting aggregate trade values. This is especially the case within more traditional industries, such as Textiles and Apparel, in which small and less developed countries can play relevant roles at various stages of the production process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41109-017-0041-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6214273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62142732018-11-13 Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance Cingolani, Isabella Panzarasa, Pietro Tajoli, Lucia Appl Netw Sci Research The international exchange of goods and services is increasingly organised along global value chains in which the various production stages are carried out at many different locations all over the world. A country can be seen as holding a central position in global trade to the extent that it is involved in a large number of economic transactions with alternative potential suppliers and has a wide access to different important markets. However, the centrality of countries’ positions in the international production of goods and services may vary according to the specific stages of the production process that countries occupy. Here we adopt a network-based perspective, and propose a novel three-faceted measure of centrality that captures countries’ distinct roles at the upstream, midstream, and downstream stages of the international production process. Findings suggest that rankings of countries based on our measures of centrality vary across production stages. While emerging and developing countries tend to secure central positions at upstream and midstream production stages, high-income countries tend to exert prevailing roles at downstream stages. Moreover, rankings based on our measures differ from alternative rankings obtained from traditional measures of market power simply reflecting aggregate trade values. This is especially the case within more traditional industries, such as Textiles and Apparel, in which small and less developed countries can play relevant roles at various stages of the production process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41109-017-0041-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-07-12 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6214273/ /pubmed/30443576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41109-017-0041-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Cingolani, Isabella
Panzarasa, Pietro
Tajoli, Lucia
Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance
title Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance
title_full Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance
title_fullStr Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance
title_full_unstemmed Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance
title_short Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance
title_sort countries’ positions in the international global value networks: centrality and economic performance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30443576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41109-017-0041-4
work_keys_str_mv AT cingolaniisabella countriespositionsintheinternationalglobalvaluenetworkscentralityandeconomicperformance
AT panzarasapietro countriespositionsintheinternationalglobalvaluenetworkscentralityandeconomicperformance
AT tajolilucia countriespositionsintheinternationalglobalvaluenetworkscentralityandeconomicperformance