Cargando…

Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?

Spatial embeddedness and planarity of urban road networks limit the range of their node degree values. Therefore, pursuing analysis based on the distribution of node degrees e.g. scale free aspect could not be accomplished in urban road networks. We have inspected the distribution of degree, between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akbarzadeh, Meisam, Memarmontazerin, Soroush, Soleimani, Sheida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30839786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41109-018-0060-9
_version_ 1783367956787363840
author Akbarzadeh, Meisam
Memarmontazerin, Soroush
Soleimani, Sheida
author_facet Akbarzadeh, Meisam
Memarmontazerin, Soroush
Soleimani, Sheida
author_sort Akbarzadeh, Meisam
collection PubMed
description Spatial embeddedness and planarity of urban road networks limit the range of their node degree values. Therefore, pursuing analysis based on the distribution of node degrees e.g. scale free aspect could not be accomplished in urban road networks. We have inspected the distribution of degree, betweenness centrality, weighted degree (based on incident link capacities), and alpha weighted degree for eight urban road networks across the world. These networks are abstracted from Philadelphia (USA), Berlin (Germany), Chicago (USA), Anaheim (USA), Gold Coast (Australia), Birmingham (UK), and Isfahan (Iran). Our results show that although the degree (weighted and unweighted) distributions of these networks are totally different, they all show power law distributions in betweenness centrality. Thus, scale free aspect could be observed in the betweenness centrality distribution. We then analyzed the collapse of network as a result of node removals. The collapse patterns suggest that critical nodes of urban road networks could not be detected solely based on betweenness centrality. Therefore, we conclude that the concept of betweenness centrality in urban road networks is more of functional merit than topological merit. In other words, central nodes play an important role in transmitting the flow but their loss would not harm the connectivity of urban networks. This claim is supported by analyzing the correlation among node flow and node betweenness in Isfahan and Anaheim.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6214283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62142832018-11-13 Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks? Akbarzadeh, Meisam Memarmontazerin, Soroush Soleimani, Sheida Appl Netw Sci Research Spatial embeddedness and planarity of urban road networks limit the range of their node degree values. Therefore, pursuing analysis based on the distribution of node degrees e.g. scale free aspect could not be accomplished in urban road networks. We have inspected the distribution of degree, betweenness centrality, weighted degree (based on incident link capacities), and alpha weighted degree for eight urban road networks across the world. These networks are abstracted from Philadelphia (USA), Berlin (Germany), Chicago (USA), Anaheim (USA), Gold Coast (Australia), Birmingham (UK), and Isfahan (Iran). Our results show that although the degree (weighted and unweighted) distributions of these networks are totally different, they all show power law distributions in betweenness centrality. Thus, scale free aspect could be observed in the betweenness centrality distribution. We then analyzed the collapse of network as a result of node removals. The collapse patterns suggest that critical nodes of urban road networks could not be detected solely based on betweenness centrality. Therefore, we conclude that the concept of betweenness centrality in urban road networks is more of functional merit than topological merit. In other words, central nodes play an important role in transmitting the flow but their loss would not harm the connectivity of urban networks. This claim is supported by analyzing the correlation among node flow and node betweenness in Isfahan and Anaheim. Springer International Publishing 2018-04-04 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6214283/ /pubmed/30839786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41109-018-0060-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Akbarzadeh, Meisam
Memarmontazerin, Soroush
Soleimani, Sheida
Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
title Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
title_full Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
title_fullStr Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
title_full_unstemmed Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
title_short Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
title_sort where to look for power laws in urban road networks?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30839786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41109-018-0060-9
work_keys_str_mv AT akbarzadehmeisam wheretolookforpowerlawsinurbanroadnetworks
AT memarmontazerinsoroush wheretolookforpowerlawsinurbanroadnetworks
AT soleimanisheida wheretolookforpowerlawsinurbanroadnetworks