Cargando…

Evaluation of the Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program in California

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The California Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program promotes the use of evidence-based tobacco-specific prevention and cessation programs for adolescents within the school setting. Through a competitive grant process, schools are funded to provide programs for grades...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMenamin, Sara B., Cummins, Sharon E., Zhuang, Yue-Lin, Gamst, Anthony C., Ruiz, Carlos G., Mayoral, Antonio, Zhu, Shu-Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30388176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206921
_version_ 1783367996835627008
author McMenamin, Sara B.
Cummins, Sharon E.
Zhuang, Yue-Lin
Gamst, Anthony C.
Ruiz, Carlos G.
Mayoral, Antonio
Zhu, Shu-Hong
author_facet McMenamin, Sara B.
Cummins, Sharon E.
Zhuang, Yue-Lin
Gamst, Anthony C.
Ruiz, Carlos G.
Mayoral, Antonio
Zhu, Shu-Hong
author_sort McMenamin, Sara B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The California Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program promotes the use of evidence-based tobacco-specific prevention and cessation programs for adolescents within the school setting. Through a competitive grant process, schools are funded to provide programs for grades 6–12. This research evaluates the association between TUPE funding and tobacco prevention activities and tobacco use prevalence. METHODS: This study utilized two data sources: (1) 2016 California Educator Tobacco Survey (CETS), and (2) 2015–2016 California Student Tobacco Survey (CSTS). The CETS collected data from educators about school prevention efforts, priority of tobacco prevention, and confidence in addressing tobacco issues with students. A total of 3,564 educators from 590 schools participated in CETS. The CSTS collected data from 8(th), 10(th), and 12(th) graders in California on their exposure to, attitudes about, and utilization of tobacco products. A total of 47,981 students from 117 schools participated in CSTS. RESULTS: This study found that TUPE-funded schools were more likely to provide tobacco-specific health education programs, to place a priority on tobacco-prevention efforts, and to prepare educators to address tobacco use than non-TUPE schools. Educators at both types of schools felt better prepared to talk with students about traditional tobacco products than about emerging products such as e-cigarettes. Overall, students at TUPE-funded schools were more likely to report receiving anti-tobacco messages from school-based programs than those at non-TUPE schools. The former were also less likely to use tobacco products, even when the analysis controlled for demographics and school-level characteristics (OR = 0.82 [95% CI = 0.70–0.96]). CONCLUSIONS: TUPE funding was associated with an increase in schools’ tobacco-specific prevention activities and these enhanced activities were associated with lower tobacco use among students. This study also found that education and prevention efforts regarding emerging tobacco products need to be strengthened across all schools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6214574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62145742018-11-19 Evaluation of the Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program in California McMenamin, Sara B. Cummins, Sharon E. Zhuang, Yue-Lin Gamst, Anthony C. Ruiz, Carlos G. Mayoral, Antonio Zhu, Shu-Hong PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The California Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program promotes the use of evidence-based tobacco-specific prevention and cessation programs for adolescents within the school setting. Through a competitive grant process, schools are funded to provide programs for grades 6–12. This research evaluates the association between TUPE funding and tobacco prevention activities and tobacco use prevalence. METHODS: This study utilized two data sources: (1) 2016 California Educator Tobacco Survey (CETS), and (2) 2015–2016 California Student Tobacco Survey (CSTS). The CETS collected data from educators about school prevention efforts, priority of tobacco prevention, and confidence in addressing tobacco issues with students. A total of 3,564 educators from 590 schools participated in CETS. The CSTS collected data from 8(th), 10(th), and 12(th) graders in California on their exposure to, attitudes about, and utilization of tobacco products. A total of 47,981 students from 117 schools participated in CSTS. RESULTS: This study found that TUPE-funded schools were more likely to provide tobacco-specific health education programs, to place a priority on tobacco-prevention efforts, and to prepare educators to address tobacco use than non-TUPE schools. Educators at both types of schools felt better prepared to talk with students about traditional tobacco products than about emerging products such as e-cigarettes. Overall, students at TUPE-funded schools were more likely to report receiving anti-tobacco messages from school-based programs than those at non-TUPE schools. The former were also less likely to use tobacco products, even when the analysis controlled for demographics and school-level characteristics (OR = 0.82 [95% CI = 0.70–0.96]). CONCLUSIONS: TUPE funding was associated with an increase in schools’ tobacco-specific prevention activities and these enhanced activities were associated with lower tobacco use among students. This study also found that education and prevention efforts regarding emerging tobacco products need to be strengthened across all schools. Public Library of Science 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6214574/ /pubmed/30388176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206921 Text en © 2018 McMenamin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McMenamin, Sara B.
Cummins, Sharon E.
Zhuang, Yue-Lin
Gamst, Anthony C.
Ruiz, Carlos G.
Mayoral, Antonio
Zhu, Shu-Hong
Evaluation of the Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program in California
title Evaluation of the Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program in California
title_full Evaluation of the Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program in California
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program in California
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program in California
title_short Evaluation of the Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program in California
title_sort evaluation of the tobacco-use prevention education (tupe) program in california
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30388176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206921
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmenaminsarab evaluationofthetobaccousepreventioneducationtupeprogramincalifornia
AT cumminssharone evaluationofthetobaccousepreventioneducationtupeprogramincalifornia
AT zhuangyuelin evaluationofthetobaccousepreventioneducationtupeprogramincalifornia
AT gamstanthonyc evaluationofthetobaccousepreventioneducationtupeprogramincalifornia
AT ruizcarlosg evaluationofthetobaccousepreventioneducationtupeprogramincalifornia
AT mayoralantonio evaluationofthetobaccousepreventioneducationtupeprogramincalifornia
AT zhushuhong evaluationofthetobaccousepreventioneducationtupeprogramincalifornia