Cargando…

Memantine treatment for Japanese patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials

PURPOSE: Although previous meta-analyses of randomized trials in the world literature have provided strong evidence that supports the efficacy and safety of memantine for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it is unclear whether the drug is beneficial in the treatment of Japanes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kishi, Taro, Matsunaga, Shinji, Iwata, Nakao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464475
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S187320
_version_ 1783368002474868736
author Kishi, Taro
Matsunaga, Shinji
Iwata, Nakao
author_facet Kishi, Taro
Matsunaga, Shinji
Iwata, Nakao
author_sort Kishi, Taro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although previous meta-analyses of randomized trials in the world literature have provided strong evidence that supports the efficacy and safety of memantine for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it is unclear whether the drug is beneficial in the treatment of Japanese patients with moderate to severe AD because of differences in the formulation and regimen of memantine and the cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) used in combination with memantine between the drugs made in Japan and those made in other countries. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of memantine using data from only double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (DBRPCTs) in Japan on Japanese patients with moderate to severe AD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our primary analysis was conducted using data from both memantine monotherapy (memantine vs placebo) and memantine combination therapy (memantine+ChEI vs ChEI+placebo) studies. The primary outcomes measured were cognitive function and behavioral disturbances. The secondary outcomes measured were the subscale scores of Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease (Behave-AD), discontinuation rate, and individual adverse events. RESULTS: Four DBRPCTs (n=1,328) were detected. Memantine was superior to the control in cognitive functions (standardized mean difference [SMD]=−0.31, 95% CI=−0.53, −0.10) and behavioral disturbances (SMD=−0.16, 95% CI=−0.28, −0.05). Only memantine monotherapy was superior in both outcomes. It was also superior to the control in delusions, aggression, and diurnal rhythm disturbances based on the Behave-AD subscale scores. Although memantine was associated with a lower incidence of AD progression than that of the control, the incidence of somnolence was higher with memantine. There were no significant differences in other safety outcomes, including all-cause discontinuation, between the groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that memantine is useful for the treatment of patients in Japan with moderate to severe AD even though our meta-analysis comprised only four DBRPCTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6214597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62145972018-11-21 Memantine treatment for Japanese patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials Kishi, Taro Matsunaga, Shinji Iwata, Nakao Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research PURPOSE: Although previous meta-analyses of randomized trials in the world literature have provided strong evidence that supports the efficacy and safety of memantine for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it is unclear whether the drug is beneficial in the treatment of Japanese patients with moderate to severe AD because of differences in the formulation and regimen of memantine and the cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) used in combination with memantine between the drugs made in Japan and those made in other countries. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of memantine using data from only double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (DBRPCTs) in Japan on Japanese patients with moderate to severe AD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our primary analysis was conducted using data from both memantine monotherapy (memantine vs placebo) and memantine combination therapy (memantine+ChEI vs ChEI+placebo) studies. The primary outcomes measured were cognitive function and behavioral disturbances. The secondary outcomes measured were the subscale scores of Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease (Behave-AD), discontinuation rate, and individual adverse events. RESULTS: Four DBRPCTs (n=1,328) were detected. Memantine was superior to the control in cognitive functions (standardized mean difference [SMD]=−0.31, 95% CI=−0.53, −0.10) and behavioral disturbances (SMD=−0.16, 95% CI=−0.28, −0.05). Only memantine monotherapy was superior in both outcomes. It was also superior to the control in delusions, aggression, and diurnal rhythm disturbances based on the Behave-AD subscale scores. Although memantine was associated with a lower incidence of AD progression than that of the control, the incidence of somnolence was higher with memantine. There were no significant differences in other safety outcomes, including all-cause discontinuation, between the groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that memantine is useful for the treatment of patients in Japan with moderate to severe AD even though our meta-analysis comprised only four DBRPCTs. Dove Medical Press 2018-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6214597/ /pubmed/30464475 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S187320 Text en © 2018 Kishi et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kishi, Taro
Matsunaga, Shinji
Iwata, Nakao
Memantine treatment for Japanese patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials
title Memantine treatment for Japanese patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials
title_full Memantine treatment for Japanese patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials
title_fullStr Memantine treatment for Japanese patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Memantine treatment for Japanese patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials
title_short Memantine treatment for Japanese patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials
title_sort memantine treatment for japanese patients with moderate to severe alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464475
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S187320
work_keys_str_mv AT kishitaro memantinetreatmentforjapanesepatientswithmoderatetoseverealzheimersdiseaseametaanalysisofdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrials
AT matsunagashinji memantinetreatmentforjapanesepatientswithmoderatetoseverealzheimersdiseaseametaanalysisofdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrials
AT iwatanakao memantinetreatmentforjapanesepatientswithmoderatetoseverealzheimersdiseaseametaanalysisofdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrials